5 INTERNET-DRAFT Kurt D. Zeilenga
6 Intended Category: BCP OpenLDAP Foundation
7 Expires in six months 21 February 2005
11 IANA Considerations for LDAP
12 <draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt>
18 This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and
19 revision, submitted to the RFC Editor as a Best Current Practice
20 document. This document is intended to replace RFC 3383.
21 Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Technical discussion of this
22 document will take place on the IETF LDAP Revision Working Group
23 (LDAPBIS) mailing list <ietf-ldapbis@openldap.org>. Please send
24 editorial comments directly to the document editor
27 By submitting this Internet-Draft, I accept the provisions of Section
28 4 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any
29 applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been
30 disclosed, or will be disclosed, and any of which I become aware will
31 be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668.
33 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
34 Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
35 groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
37 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
38 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
39 time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
40 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
42 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
43 http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
45 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
46 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
49 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). All Rights Reserved.
51 Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document
56 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 1]
58 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
63 This document provides procedures for registering extensible elements
64 of Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). The document also
65 provides guidelines to Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
66 describing conditions under which new values can be assigned.
71 The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol [Roadmap] (LDAP) is an
72 extensible protocol. LDAP supports:
74 - addition of new operations,
75 - extension of existing operations, and
78 This document details procedures for registering values of used to
79 unambiguously identify extensible elements of the protocol including:
82 - LDAP extended operations and controls;
84 - LDAP authentication methods;
85 - LDAP attribute description options; and
86 - Object Identifier descriptors.
88 These registries are maintained by the Internet Assigned Numbers
91 In addition, this document provides guidelines to IANA describing the
92 conditions under which new values can be assigned.
94 This document replaces RFC 3383.
97 2. Terminology and Conventions
99 This section details terms and conventions used in this document.
102 2.1. Policy Terminology
104 The terms "IESG Approval", "Standards Action", "IETF Consensus",
105 "Specification Required", "First Come First Served", "Expert Review",
106 and "Private Use" are used as defined in BCP 26 [RFC2434].
112 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 2]
114 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
117 2.2. Requirement Terminology
119 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
120 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
121 document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119]. In
122 this case, "the specification" as used by BCP 14 refers to the
123 processing of protocols being submitted to the IETF standards
127 2.3. Common ABNF Productions
129 A number of syntaxes in this document are described using ABNF
130 [RFC2234]. These syntaxes rely on the following common productions:
132 ALPHA = %x41-5A / %x61-7A ; "A"-"Z" / "a"-"z"
133 LDIGIT = %x31-39 ; "1"-"9"
134 DIGIT = %x30 / LDIGIT ; "0"-"9"
137 number = DIGIT / ( LDIGIT 1*DIGIT )
138 keychar = ALPHA / DIGIT / HYPHEN
140 keystring = leadkeychar *keychar
142 A keyword is a case-insensitive string of UTF-8 [RFC3629] encoded
143 Unicode [Unicode] restricted to the <keystring> production.
146 3. IANA Considerations for LDAP
148 This section details each kind of protocol value which can be
149 registered and provides IANA guidelines on how to assign new values.
151 IANA may reject obviously bogus registrations described.
153 LDAP values specified in RFCs MUST be registered. Other LDAP values,
154 expecting those in private-use name spaces, SHOULD be registered.
155 RFCs SHOULD NOT reference, use, or otherwise recongize unregistered
159 3.1. Object Identifiers
161 Numerous LDAP schema and protocol elements are identified by Object
162 Identifiers (OIDs) [X.680]. Specifications which assign OIDs to
163 elements SHOULD state who delegated the OIDs for its use.
168 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 3]
170 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
173 For IETF developed elements, specifications SHOULD use OIDs under
174 "Internet Directory Numbers" (1.3.6.1.1.x). For elements developed
175 by others, any properly delegated OID can be used, including those
176 under "Internet Directory Numbers" (1.3.6.1.1.x) or "Internet Private
177 Enterprise Numbers" (1.3.6.1.4.1.x).
179 Internet Directory Numbers (1.3.6.1.1.x) will be assigned upon Expert
180 Review with Specification Required. Only one OID per specification
181 will be assigned. The specification MAY then assign any number of
182 OIDs within this arc without further coordination with IANA.
184 Internet Private Enterprise Numbers (1.3.6.1.4.1.x) are assigned by
185 IANA <http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/enterprise.pl>. Practices for IANA
186 assignment of Internet Private Enterprise Numbers is detailed in STD
189 To avoid interoperability problems between early implementations of a
190 "work in progress" and implementations of the published specification
191 (e.g., the RFC), experimental OIDs SHOULD be used in "works in
192 progress" and early implementations. OIDs under the Internet
193 Experimental OID arc (1.3.6.1.3.x) may be used for this purpose.
194 Practices for IANA assignment of these Internet Experimental numbers
195 is detailed in STD 16 [RFC1155].
198 3.2 Protocol Mechanisms
200 LDAP provides a number of Root DSE attributes for discovery of
201 protocol mechanisms identified by OIDs, including the
202 supportedControl, supportedExtension, and supportedFeatures
205 A registry of OIDs used for discover of protocol mechanisms is
206 provided to allow implementors and others to locate the technical
207 specification for these protocol mechanisms. Future specifications
208 of additional Root DSE attributes holding values identifying protocol
209 mechanisms MAY extend this registry for their values.
211 Protocol Mechanisms are registered on a First Come First Served
217 This registry provides a listing of LDAP syntaxes [Models]. Each
218 LDAP syntax is identified by an object identifier (OID). This
219 registry is provided to allow implementors and others to locate the
220 technical specification describing a particular LDAP Syntax.
224 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 4]
226 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
229 LDAP Syntaxes are registered on a First Come First Served with
230 Specification Required basis.
232 Note: unlike object classes, attribute types and various other kinds
233 of schema elements, descriptors are not used in LDAP to identify LDAP
237 3.4. Object Identifier Descriptors
239 LDAP allows short descriptive names (or descriptors) to be used
240 instead of a numeric Object Identifier to identify select protocol
241 extensions [Protocol], schema elements [Models], LDAP URL [LDAPURL]
242 extensions, and other objects.
244 While the protocol allows the same descriptor to refer to different
245 object identifiers in certain cases and the registry supports
246 multiple registrations of the same descriptor (each indicating a
247 different kind of schema element and different object identifier),
248 multiple registrations of the same descriptor are to be avoided. All
249 such registration requests require Expert Review.
251 Descriptors are restricted to strings of UTF-8 encoded Unicode
252 characters restricted by the following ABNF:
256 Descriptors are case-insensitive.
258 Multiple names may be assigned to a given OID. For purposes of
259 registration, an OID is to be represented in numeric OID form (e.g.,
260 1.1.0.23.40) conforming to the ABNF:
262 numericoid = number 1*( DOT number )
264 While the protocol places no maximum length restriction upon
265 descriptors, they should be short. Descriptors longer than 48
266 characters may be viewed as too long to register.
268 A value ending with a hyphen ("-") reserves all descriptors which
269 start with that value. For example, the registration of the option
270 "descrFamily-" reserves all options which start with "descrFamily-"
271 for some related purpose.
273 Descriptors beginning with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot be
276 Descriptors beginning with "e-" are reserved for experiments and will
280 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 5]
282 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
285 be registered on a First Come First Served basis.
287 All other descriptors require Expert Review to be registered.
289 The registrant need not "own" the OID being named.
291 The OID name space is managed by The ISO/IEC Joint Technical
292 Committee 1 - Subcommittee 6.
295 3.5. AttributeDescription Options
297 An AttributeDescription [Models] can contain zero or more options
298 specifying additional semantics. An option SHALL be restricted to a
299 string UTF-8 encoded Unicode characters limited by the following
304 Options are case-insensitive.
306 While the protocol places no maximum length restriction upon option
307 strings, they should be short. Options longer than 24 characters may
308 be viewed as too long to register.
310 Values ending with a hyphen ("-") reserve all option names which
311 start with the name. For example, the registration of the option
312 "optionFamily-" reserves all options which start with "optionFamily-"
313 for some related purpose.
315 Options beginning with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot be
318 Options beginning with "e-" are reserved for experiments and will be
319 registered on a First Come First Served basis.
321 All other options require Standards Action or Expert Review with
322 Specification Required to be registered.
325 3.6. LDAP Message Types
327 Each protocol message is encapsulated in an LDAPMessage envelope
328 [Protocol]. The protocolOp CHOICE indicates the type of message
329 encapsulated. Each message type consists of an ASN.1 identifier in
330 the form of a keyword and a non-negative choice number. The choice
331 number is combined with the class (APPLICATION) and data type
332 (CONSTRUCTED or PRIMITIVE) to construct the BER tag in the message's
336 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 6]
338 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
341 encoding. The choice numbers for existing protocol messages are
342 implicit in the protocol's ASN.1 defined in [Protocol].
344 New values will be registered upon Standards Action.
346 Note: LDAP provides extensible messages which reduces, but does not
347 eliminate, the need to add new message types.
350 3.7. LDAP Authentication Method
352 The LDAP Bind operation supports multiple authentication methods
353 [Protocol]. Each authentication choice consists of an ASN.1
354 identifier in the form of a keyword and a non-negative integer.
356 The registrant SHALL classify the authentication method usage using
357 one of the following terms:
359 COMMON - method is appropriate for common use on the
361 LIMITED USE - method is appropriate for limited use,
362 OBSOLETE - method has been deprecated or otherwise found to
363 be inappropriate for any use.
365 Methods without publicly available specifications SHALL NOT be
366 classified as COMMON. New registrations of class OBSOLETE cannot be
369 New authentication method integers in the range 0-1023 require
370 Standards Action to be registered. New authentication method
371 integers in the range 1024-4095 require Expert Review with
372 Specification Required. New authentication method integers in the
373 range 4096-16383 will be registered on a First Come First Served
374 basis. Keywords associated with integers in the range 0-4095 SHALL
375 NOT start with "e-" or "x-". Keywords associated with integers in
376 the range 4096-16383 SHALL start with "e-". Values greater than or
377 equal to 16384 and keywords starting with "x-" are for Private Use
378 and cannot be registered.
380 Note: LDAP supports Simple Authentication and Security Layers [SASL]
381 as an authentication choice. SASL is an extensible
382 authentication framework.
385 3.8. LDAP Result Codes
387 LDAP result messages carry an resultCode enumerated value to indicate
388 the outcome of the operation [Protocol]. Each result code consists
392 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 7]
394 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
397 of a ASN.1 identifier in the form of a keyword and a non-negative
400 New resultCodes integers in the range 0-1023 require Standards Action
401 to be registered. New resultCode integers in the range 1024-4095
402 require Expert Review with Specification Required. New resultCode
403 integers in the range 4096-16383 will be registered on a First Come
404 First Served basis. Keywords associated with integers in the range
405 0-4095 SHALL NOT start with "e-" or "x-". Keywords associated with
406 integers in the range 4096-16383 SHALL start with "e-". Values
407 greater than or equal to 16384 and keywords starting with "x-" are
408 for Private Use and cannot be registered.
411 3.9. LDAP Search Scope
413 LDAP SearchRequest messages carry a scope enumerated value to
414 indicate the extend of search within the DIT [Protocol] Each search
415 value consists of a ASN.1 identifier in the form of a keyword and a
416 non-negative integer.
418 New scope integers in the range 0-1023 require Standards Action to be
419 registered. New scope integers in the range 1024-4095 require Expert
420 Review with Specification Required. New scope integers in the range
421 4096-16383 will be registered on a First Come First Served basis.
422 Keywords associated with integers in the range 0-4095 SHALL NOT start
423 with "e-" or "x-". Keywords associated with integers in the range
424 4096-16383 SHALL start with "e-". Values greater than or equal to
425 16384 and keywords starting with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot
429 3.10. LDAP Filter Choice
431 LDAP filters are used in making assertions against an object
432 represented in the directory [Protocol]. The Filter CHOICE indicates
433 a type of assertion. Each Filter CHOICE consists of an ASN.1
434 identifier in the form of a keyword and a non-negative choice number.
435 The choice number is combined with the class (APPLICATION) and data
436 type (CONSTRUCTED or PRIMITIVE) to construct the BER tag in the
439 Note: LDAP provides the extensibleMatching choice which reduces, but
440 does not eliminate, the need to add new filter choices.
443 3.11. LDAP ModifyRequest Operation Type
448 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 8]
450 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
453 The LDAP ModifyRequest carries a sequence of modification operations
454 [Protocol]. Each kind (e.g., add, delete, replace) of operation is
455 consists of a ASN.1 identifier in the form of a keyword and a
456 non-negative integer.
458 New operation type integers in the range 0-1023 require Standards
459 Action to be registered. New operation type integers in the range
460 1024-4095 require Expert Review with Specification Required. New
461 operation type integers in the range 4096-16383 will be registered on
462 a First Come First Served basis. Keywords associated with integers
463 in the range 0-4095 SHALL NOT start with "e-" or "x-". Keywords
464 associated with integers in the range 4096-16383 SHALL start with
465 "e-". Values greater than or equal to 16384 and keywords starting
466 with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot be registered.
469 3.12. LDAP authzId Prefixes
471 Authorization Identities in LDAP are strings conforming to the
472 <authzId> production [AuthMeth]. This production is extensible.
473 Each new specific authorization form is identified by a prefix string
474 conforming to the following ABNF:
476 prefix = keystring COLON
477 COLON = %x3A ; COLON (":" U+003A)
479 Prefixes are case-insensitive.
481 While the protocol places no maximum length restriction upon prefix
482 strings, they should be short. Prefixes longer than 12 characters
483 may be viewed as too long to register.
485 Prefixes beginning with "x-" are for Private Use and cannot be
488 Prefixes beginning with "e-" are reserved for experiments and will be
489 registered on a First Come First Served basis.
491 All other prefixes require Standards Action or Expert Review with
492 Specification Required to be registered.
495 3.13. Directory Systems Names
497 The IANA-maintained "Directory Systems Names" registry [IANADSN] of
498 valid keywords for well known attributes was used in the LDAPv2
499 string representation of a distinguished name [RFC1779]. LDAPv2 is
500 now Historic [RFC3494].
504 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 9]
506 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
509 Directory systems names are not known to be used in any other
510 context. LDAPv3 [LDAPDN] uses Object Identifier Descriptors [Section
511 3.2] (which have a different syntax than directory system names).
513 New Directory System Names will no longer be accepted. For
514 historical purposes, the current list of registered names should
515 remain publicly available.
518 4. Registration Procedure
520 The procedure given here MUST be used by anyone who wishes to use a
521 new value of a type described in Section 3 of this document.
523 The first step is for the requester to fill out the appropriate form.
524 Templates are provided in Appendix A.
526 If the policy is Standards Action, the completed form SHOULD be
527 provided to the IESG with the request for Standards Action. Upon
528 approval of the Standards Action, the IESG SHALL forward the request
529 (possibly revised) to IANA. The IESG SHALL be viewed as the owner of
530 all values requiring Standards Action.
532 If the policy is Expert Review, the requester SHALL post the
533 completed form to the <directory@apps.ietf.org> mailing list for
534 public review. The review period is two (2) weeks. If a revised
535 form is later submitted, the review period is restarted. Anyone may
536 subscribe to this list by sending a request to
537 <directory-request@apps.ietf.org>. During the review, objections may
538 be raised by anyone (including the Expert) on the list. After
539 completion of the review, the Expert, based upon public comments,
540 SHALL either approve the request and forward it to the IESG OR deny
541 the request. In either case, the Expert SHALL promptly notify the
542 requester of the action. Actions of the Expert may be appealed
543 [RFC2026]. The Expert is appointed by Applications Area Director(s).
544 The requester is viewed as the owner of values registered under
547 If the policy is First Come First Served, the requester SHALL submit
548 the completed form directly to the IANA: <iana@iana.org>. The
549 requester is viewed as the owner of values registered under First
552 Neither the Expert nor IANA will take position on the claims of
553 copyright or trademarks issues regarding completed forms.
555 Prior to submission of the Internet Draft (I-D) to the RFC Editor but
556 after IESG review and tentative approval, the document editor SHOULD
560 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 10]
562 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
565 revise the I-D to use registered values.
568 5. Registration Maintenance
570 This section discusses maintenance of registrations.
573 5.1. Lists of Registered Values
575 IANA makes lists of registered values readily available to the
576 Internet community on their web site: <http://www.iana.org/>.
581 The registration owner MAY update the registration subject to the
582 same constraints and review as with new registrations. In cases
583 where the owner is not unable or unwilling to make necessary updates,
584 the IESG MAY assume ownership in order to update the registration.
589 For cases where others (anyone other than the owner) have significant
590 objections to the claims in a registration and the owner does not
591 agree to change the registration, comments MAY be attached to a
592 registration upon Expert Review. For registrations owned by the
593 IESG, the objections SHOULD be addressed by initiating a request for
596 The form to these requests is ad hoc, but MUST include the specific
597 objections to be reviewed and SHOULD contain (directly or by
598 reference) materials supporting the objections.
601 6. Security Considerations
603 The security considerations detailed in BCP 26 [RFC2434] are
604 generally applicable to this document. Additional security
605 considerations specific to each name space are discussed in Section 3
608 Security considerations for LDAP are discussed in documents
609 comprising the technical specification [Roadmap].
616 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 11]
618 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
621 This document is a product of the IETF LDAP Revision (LDAPBIS)
622 Working Group (WG). This document is a revision of RFC 3383, also a
623 product of the LDAPBIS WG.
625 This document includes text borrowed from "Guidelines for Writing an
626 IANA Considerations Section in RFCs" [RFC2434] by Thomas Narten and
635 Email: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
640 [[Note to the RFC Editor: please replace the citation tags used in
641 referencing Internet-Drafts with tags of the form RFCnnnn where
645 9.1. Normative References
647 [RFC1155] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and
648 Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP-
649 based Internets", STD 16 (also RFC 1155), May 1990.
651 [RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
652 3", BCP 9 (also RFC 2026), October 1996.
654 [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
655 Requirement Levels", BCP 14 (also RFC 2119), March 1997.
657 [RFC2234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
658 Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997.
660 [RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
661 IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26 (also RFC
664 [RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
665 10646", RFC 3629 (also STD 63), November 2003.
667 [Roadmap] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Technical Specification
668 Road Map", draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in
672 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 12]
674 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
679 [AuthMeth] Harrison, R. (editor), "LDAP: Authentication Methods and
680 Connection Level Security Mechanisms",
681 draft-ietf-ldapbis-authmeth-xx.txt, a work in progress.
683 [Models] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Directory Information
684 Models", draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-xx.txt, a work in
687 [Protocol] Sermersheim, J. (editor), "LDAP: The Protocol",
688 draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-xx.txt, a work in progress.
690 [LDAPURL] Smith, M. (editor), "LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator",
691 draft-ietf-ldapbis-url-xx.txt, a work in progress.
693 [Unicode] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version
694 3.2.0" is defined by "The Unicode Standard, Version 3.0"
695 (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2000. ISBN 0-201-61633-5),
696 as amended by the "Unicode Standard Annex #27: Unicode
697 3.1" (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr27/) and by the
698 "Unicode Standard Annex #28: Unicode 3.2"
699 (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr28/).
701 [X.680] International Telecommunication Union -
702 Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Abstract
703 Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) - Specification of Basic
704 Notation", X.680(2002) (also ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002).
707 9.2. Informative References
709 [RFC1779] Kille, S., "A String Representation of Distinguished
710 Names", RFC 1779, March 1995.
712 [RFC3494] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
713 version 2 (LDAPv2) to Historic Status", RFC 3494, March
716 [Syntaxes] Legg, S. (editor), "LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules",
717 draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-xx.txt, a work in progress.
719 [LDAPDN] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: String Representation of
720 Distinguished Names", draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-xx.txt, a
723 [SASL] Melnikov, A. (Editor), "Simple Authentication and
724 Security Layer (SASL)",
728 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 13]
730 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
733 draft-ietf-sasl-rfc2222bis-xx.txt, a work in progress.
735 [IANADSN] IANA, "Directory Systems Names",
736 http://www.iana.org/assignments/directory-system-names.
739 Appendix A. Registration Templates
741 This appendix provides registration templates for registering new
742 LDAP values. Note that more than one value may be requested by
743 extending the template by listing multiple values, or through use of
747 A.1. LDAP Object Identifier Registration Template
749 Subject: Request for LDAP OID Registration
751 Person & email address to contact for further information:
755 Author/Change Controller:
759 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
762 A.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration Template
764 Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration
770 Person & email address to contact for further information:
772 Usage: (One of Control or Extension or Feature or other)
774 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
776 Author/Change Controller:
780 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
784 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 14]
786 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
789 A.3. LDAP Syntax Registration Template
791 Subject: Request for LDAP Syntax Registration
797 Person & email address to contact for further information:
799 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
801 Author/Change Controller:
805 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
808 A.4. LDAP Descriptor Registration Template
810 Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration
812 Descriptor (short name):
816 Person & email address to contact for further information:
818 Usage: (One of administrative role, attribute type, matching rule,
819 name form, object class, URL extension, or other)
821 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
823 Author/Change Controller:
827 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
830 A.5. LDAP Attribute Description Option Registration Template
832 Subject: Request for LDAP Attribute Description Option Registration
836 Family of Options: (YES or NO)
840 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 15]
842 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
845 Person & email address to contact for further information:
847 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
849 Author/Change Controller:
853 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
856 A.6. LDAP Message Type Registration Template
858 Subject: Request for LDAP Message Type Registration
862 Person & email address to contact for further information:
864 Specification: (Approved I-D)
868 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
871 A.7. LDAP Authentication Method Registration Template
873 Subject: Request for LDAP Authentication Method Registration
875 Authentication Method Name:
877 Person & email address to contact for further information:
879 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
881 Intended Usage: (One of COMMON, LIMITED-USE, OBSOLETE)
883 Author/Change Controller:
887 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
890 A.8. LDAP Result Code Registration Template
892 Subject: Request for LDAP Result Code Registration
896 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 16]
898 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
903 Person & email address to contact for further information:
905 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
907 Author/Change Controller:
911 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
914 A.8. LDAP Search Scope Registration Template
916 Subject: Request for LDAP Search Scope Registration
922 Person & email address to contact for further information:
924 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
926 Author/Change Controller:
930 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
933 A.9. LDAP Filter Choice Registration Template
935 Subject: Request for LDAP Filter Choice Registration
939 Person & email address to contact for further information:
941 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
943 Author/Change Controller:
947 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
952 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 17]
954 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
957 A.10. LDAP ModifyRequest Operation Registration Template
959 Subject: Request for LDAP ModifyRequest Operation Registration
961 ModifyRequest Operation Name:
963 Person & email address to contact for further information:
965 Specification: (RFC, I-D, URI)
967 Author/Change Controller:
971 (Any comments that the requester deems relevant to the request)
974 Appendix B. Changes since RFC 3383
976 This informative appendix provides a summary of changes made since RFC
979 - Object Identifier Descriptors practices were updated to require
980 all descriptors defined in RFCs to be registered and
981 recommending all other descriptors (excepting those in
982 private-use name space) be registered. Additionally, all
983 requests for multiple registrations of the same descriptor are
984 now subject to Expert Review.
986 - Protocol Mechanisms practices were updated to include values of
987 the 'supportedFeatures' attribute type.
989 - LDAP Syntax, Search Scope, Filter Choice, ModifyRequest
990 operation, and authzId prefixes registries were added.
991 [[Initial values provided in Appendix C. This Appendix is to be
992 removed by the RFC Editor before publication as an RFC.]]
994 - References to RFCs comprising the LDAP technical specifications
995 have been updated to latest revisions.
997 - References to ISO 10646 have been replaced with [Unicode].
999 - The "Assigned Values" appendix providing initial registry values
1002 - Numerous editorial changes were made.
1008 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 18]
1010 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
1013 Appendix C. Initial Values for new registries
1015 This appendix provides initial values for new registries.
1020 Object Identifier Syntax Owner Reference
1021 ----------------------------- -------------------------- ----- ---
1022 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.3 Attribute Type Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1023 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.6 Bit String IESG [Syntaxes]
1024 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 Boolean IESG [Syntaxes]
1025 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.11 Country String IESG [Syntaxes]
1026 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 DN IESG [Syntaxes]
1027 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.14 Delivery Method IESG [Syntaxes]
1028 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 Directory String IESG [Syntaxes]
1029 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.16 DIT Content Rule Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1030 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.17 DIT Structure Rule Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1031 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.21 Enhanced Guide IESG [Syntaxes]
1032 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.22 Facsimile Telephone Number IESG [Syntaxes]
1033 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.23 Fax IESG [Syntaxes]
1034 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24 Generalized Time IESG [Syntaxes]
1035 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.25 Guide IESG [Syntaxes]
1036 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 IA5 String IESG [Syntaxes]
1037 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 Integer IESG [Syntaxes]
1038 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.28 JPEG IESG [Syntaxes]
1039 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.30 Matching Rule Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1040 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.31 Matching Rule Use Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1041 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.34 Name And Optional UID IESG [Syntaxes]
1042 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.35 Name Form Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1043 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36 Numeric String IESG [Syntaxes]
1044 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.37 Object Class Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1045 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38 OID IESG [Syntaxes]
1046 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.39 Other Mailbox IESG [Syntaxes]
1047 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40 Octet String IESG [Syntaxes]
1048 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.41 Postal Address IESG [Syntaxes]
1049 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.44 Printable String IESG [Syntaxes]
1050 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 Telephone Number IESG [Syntaxes]
1051 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.51 Teletex Terminal Identifier IESG [Syntaxes]
1052 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.52 Telex Number IESG [Syntaxes]
1053 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.53 UTC Time IESG [Syntaxes]
1054 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.54 LDAP Syntax Description IESG [Syntaxes]
1055 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 Substring Assertion IESG [Syntaxes]
1058 C.2. LDAP Search Scopes
1060 Name URLString Value Owner Reference
1064 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 19]
1066 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
1069 ---------------- --------- ----- ----- -------------------
1070 baseObject base 0 IESG [Protocol][LDAPURL]
1071 singleLevel one 1 IESG [Protocol][LDAPURL]
1072 wholeSubtree sub 2 IESG [Protocol][LDAPURL]
1075 C.3. LDAP Filter Choices
1077 Name Value Owner Reference
1078 ---------------- ----- ----- ---------
1079 and 0 IESG [Protocol]
1080 or 1 IESG [Protocol]
1081 not 2 IESG [Protocol]
1082 equalityMatch 3 IESG [Protocol]
1083 substrings 4 IESG [Protocol]
1084 greaterOrEqual 5 IESG [Protocol]
1085 lessOrEqual 6 IESG [Protocol]
1086 present 7 IESG [Protocol]
1087 approxMatch 8 IESG [Protocol]
1088 extensibleMatch 9 IESG [Protocol]
1091 C.4. LDAP ModifyRequest Operations
1093 Name Value Owner Reference
1094 ---------------- ----- ----- ---------
1095 add 0 IESG [Protocol]
1096 delete 1 IESG [Protocol]
1097 replace 2 IESG [Protocol]
1100 C.5. LDAP authzId prefixes
1102 Name Prefix Owner Reference
1103 ---------------- ------ ----- ---------
1104 dnAuthzId dn: IESG [AuthMeth]
1105 uAuthzId u: IESG [AuthMeth]
1110 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
1111 to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
1112 except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
1114 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
1115 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
1116 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
1120 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 20]
1122 INTERNET-DRAFT draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-05.txt 21 February 2005
1125 ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
1126 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
1127 INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
1128 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
1132 Intellectual Property Rights
1134 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
1135 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
1136 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
1137 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
1138 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
1139 made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
1140 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found
1141 in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
1143 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
1144 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
1145 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
1146 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification
1147 can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
1148 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
1150 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
1151 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
1152 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
1153 this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
1176 Zeilenga IANA Considerations for LDAP [Page 21]