rationale of this test

[openldap] / doc / drafts / draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-xx.txt

INTERNET-DRAFT                           Editor: Kurt D. Zeilenga
Intended Category: Standard Track                OpenLDAP Foundation
Expires in six months                            10 February 2005
Obsoletes: RFC 2253



            LDAP: String Representation of Distinguished Names
                      <draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt>



Status of Memo

  This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and
  revision, submitted to the RFC Editor as a Standard Track document
  replacing RFC 2253.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
  Technical discussion of this document will take place on the IETF LDAP
  Revision (LDAPBIS) Working Group mailing list
  <ietf-ldapbis@openldap.org>.  Please send editorial comments directly
  to the document editor <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>.

  By submitting this Internet-Draft, I accept the provisions of Section
  4 of RFC 3667.  By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any
  applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been
  disclosed, or will be disclosed, and any of which I become aware will
  be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668.

  Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task
  Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
  groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

  Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
  and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
  time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material
  or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

  The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
  http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html

  The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
  http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html


  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  All Rights Reserved.

  Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document
  for more information.



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 1]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


Abstract

  The X.500 Directory uses distinguished names (DNs) as primary keys to
  entries in the directory.  This document defines the string
  representation used in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
  (LDAP) to transfer distinguished names.  The string representation is
  designed to give a clean representation of commonly used distinguished
  names, while being able to represent any distinguished name.


1.  Background and Intended Usage

  In X.500-based directory systems [X.500], including those accessed
  using the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [Roadmap],
  distinguished names (DNs) are used to unambiguously refer to directory
  entries [X.501][Models].

  The structure of a DN [X.501] is described in terms of ASN.1 [X.680].
  In the X.500 Directory Access Protocol [X.511] (and other ITU-defined
  directory protocols), DNs are encoded using the Basic Encoding Rules
  (BER) [X.690].  In LDAP, DNs are represented in the string form
  described in this document.

  It is important to have a common format to be able to unambiguously
  represent a distinguished name.  The primary goal of this
  specification is ease of encoding and decoding.  A secondary goal is
  to have names that are human readable.  It is not expected that LDAP
  implementations with a human user interface would display these
  strings directly to the user, but would most likely be performing
  translations (such as expressing attribute type names in the local
  national language).

  This document defines the string representation of Distinguished Names
  used in LDAP [Protocol][Syntaxes].  Section 2 details the RECOMMENDED
  algorithm for converting a DN from its ASN.1 structured representation
  to a string.  Section 3 details how to convert a DN from a string to a
  ASN.1 structured representation.

  While other documents may define other algorithms for converting a DN
  from its ASN.1 structured representation to a string, all algorithms
  MUST produce strings which adhere to the requirements of Section 3.

  This document does not define a canonical string representation for
  DNs.  Comparison of DNs for equality is to be performed in accordance
  with the distinguishedNameMatch matching rule [Syntaxes].

  This document is a integral part of the LDAP technical specification
  [Roadmap] which obsoletes the previously defined LDAP technical



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 2]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


  specification, RFC 3377, in its entirety.  This document obsoletes RFC
  2253.  Changes since RFC 2253 are summarized in Appendix B.

  This specification assumes familiarity with X.500 [X.500] and the
  concept of Distinguished Name [X.501][Models].


1.1. Conventions

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
  document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].

  Character names in this document use the notation for code points and
  names from the Unicode Standard [Unicode].  For example, the letter
  "a" may be represented as either <U+0061> or <LATIN SMALL LETTER A>.

  Note: a glossary of terms used in Unicode can be found in [Glossary].
  Information on the Unicode character encoding model can be found in
  [CharModel].


2.  Converting DistinguishedName from ASN.1 to a String

  X.501 [X.501] defines the ASN.1 [X.680] structure of distinguished
  name.  The following is a variant provided for discussion purposes.

      DistinguishedName ::= RDNSequence

      RDNSequence ::= SEQUENCE OF RelativeDistinguishedName

      RelativeDistinguishedName ::= SET SIZE (1..MAX) OF
          AttributeTypeAndValue

      AttributeTypeAndValue ::= SEQUENCE {
          type  AttributeType,
          value AttributeValue }

  This section defines the RECOMMENDED algorithm for converting a
  distinguished name from an ASN.1 structured representation to an UTF-8
  [RFC3629] encoded Unicode [Unicode] character string representation.
  Other documents may describe other algorithms for converting a
  distinguished name to a string, but only strings which conform to the
  grammar defined in Section 3 SHALL be produced by LDAP
  implementations.


2.1. Converting the RDNSequence



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 3]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


  If the RDNSequence is an empty sequence, the result is the empty or
  zero length string.

  Otherwise, the output consists of the string encodings of each
  RelativeDistinguishedName in the RDNSequence (according to Section
  2.2), starting with the last element of the sequence and moving
  backwards toward the first.

  The encodings of adjoining RelativeDistinguishedNames are separated by
  a comma (',' U+002C) character.


2.2.  Converting RelativeDistinguishedName

  When converting from an ASN.1 RelativeDistinguishedName to a string,
  the output consists of the string encodings of each
  AttributeTypeAndValue (according to Section 2.3), in any order.

  Where there is a multi-valued RDN, the outputs from adjoining
  AttributeTypeAndValues are separated by a plus sign ('+' U+002B)
  character.


2.3.  Converting AttributeTypeAndValue

  The AttributeTypeAndValue is encoded as the string representation of
  the AttributeType, followed by an equals sign ('=' U+003D) character,
  followed by the string representation of the AttributeValue.  The
  encoding of the AttributeValue is given in Section 2.4.

  If the AttributeType is defined to have a short name (descriptor)
  [Models] and that short name is known to be registered
  [REGISTRY][BCP64bis] as identifying the AttributeType, that short
  name, a <descr>, is used.  Otherwise the AttributeType is encoded as
  the dotted-decimal encoding, a <numericoid>, of its OBJECT IDENTIFIER.
  The <descr> and <numericoid> is defined in [Models].

  Implementations are not expected to dynamically update their knowledge
  of registered short names.  However, implementations SHOULD provide a
  mechanism to allow its knowledge of registered short names to be
  updated.


2.4.  Converting an AttributeValue from ASN.1 to a String

  If the AttributeType is of the dotted-decimal form, the AttributeValue
  is represented by an number sign ('#' U+0023) character followed by
  the hexadecimal encoding of each of the octets of the BER encoding of



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 4]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


  the X.500 AttributeValue.  This form is also used when the syntax of
  the AttributeValue does not have a LDAP-specific [Syntaxes, Section
  3.1] string encoding defined for it or the LDAP-specific string
  encoding is not restricted to UTF-8 encoded Unicode characters.  This
  form may also be used in other cases, such as when a reversible string
  representation is desired (see Section 5.2).

  Otherwise, if the AttributeValue is of a syntax which has a
  LDAP-specific string encoding, the value is converted first to a UTF-8
  encoded Unicode string according to its syntax specification (see
  [Syntaxes, Section 3.3] for examples).  If that UTF-8 encoded Unicode
  string does not have any of the following characters which need
  escaping, then that string can be used as the string representation of
  the value.

      - a space (' ' U+0020) or number sign ('#' U+0023) occurring at
        the beginning of the string;

      - a space (' ' U+0020) character occurring at the end of the
        string;

      - one of the characters '"', '+', ',', ';', '<', '>',  or '\'
        (U+0022, U+002B, U+002C, U+003B, U+003C, U+003E, or U+005C
        respectively);

      - the null (U+0000) character.

  Other characters may be escaped.

  Each octet of the character to be escaped is replaced by a backslash
  and two hex digits, which form a single octet in the code of the
  character.  Alternatively, if and only if the character to be escaped
  is one of

      ' ', '"', '#', '+', ',', ';', '<', '=', '>', or '\'
      (U+0020, U+0022, U+0023, U+002B, U+002C, U+003B,
       U+003C, U+003D, U+003E, U+005C respectively)

  it can be prefixed by a backslash ('\' U+005C).

  Examples of the escaping mechanism are shown in Section 4.


3. Parsing a String back to a Distinguished Name

  The string representation of Distinguished Names is restricted to
  UTF-8 [RFC3629] encoded Unicode [Unicode] characters.  The structure
  of this string representation is specified using the following



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 5]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


  Augmented BNF [RFC2234] grammar:

      distinguishedName = [ relativeDistinguishedName
          *( COMMA relativeDistinguishedName ) ]
      relativeDistinguishedName = attributeTypeAndValue
          *( PLUS attributeTypeAndValue )
      attributeTypeAndValue = attributeType EQUALS attributeValue
      attributeType = descr / numericoid
      attributeValue = string / hexstring

      ; The following characters are to be escaped when they appear
      ; in the value to be encoded: ESC, one of <escaped>, leading
      ; SHARP or SPACE, trailing SPACE, and NULL.
      string =   [ ( leadchar / pair ) [ *( stringchar / pair )
         ( trailchar / pair ) ] ]

      leadchar = LUTF1 / UTFMB
      LUTF1 = %x01-1F / %x21 / %x24-2A / %x2D-3A /
         %x3D / %x3F-5B / %x5D-7F

      trailchar  = TUTF1 / UTFMB
      TUTF1 = %x01-1F / %x21 / %x23-2A / %x2D-3A /
         %x3D / %x3F-5B / %x5D-7F

      stringchar = SUTF1 / UTFMB
      SUTF1 = %x01-21 / %x23-2A / %x2D-3A /
         %x3D / %x3F-5B / %x5D-7F

      pair = ESC ( ESC / special / hexpair )
      special = escaped / SPACE / SHARP / EQUALS
      escaped = DQUOTE / PLUS / COMMA / SEMI / LANGLE / RANGLE
      hexstring = SHARP 1*hexpair
      hexpair = HEX HEX

  where the productions <descr>, <numericoid>, <COMMA>, <DQUOTE>,
  <EQUALS>, <ESC>, <HEX>, <LANGLE>, <NULL>, <PLUS>, <RANGLE>, <SEMI>,
  <SPACE>, <SHARP>, <UTFMB> are defined in [Models].

  Each <attributeType>, either a <descr> or a <numericoid>, refers to an
  attribute type of an attribute value assertion (AVA).  The
  <attributeType> is followed by a <EQUALS> and an <attributeValue>.
  The <attributeValue> is either in <string> or <hexstring> form.

  If in <string> form, a LDAP string representation asserted value can
  be obtained by replacing (left-to-right, non-recursively) each <pair>
  appearing in the <string> as follows:
      replace <ESC><ESC> with <ESC>;
      replace <ESC><special> with <special>;



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 6]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


      replace <ESC><hexpair> with the octet indicated by the <hexpair>.

  If in <hexstring> form, a BER representation can be obtained from
  converting each <hexpair> of the <hexstring> to the octet indicated by
  the <hexpair>.

  One or more attribute values assertions, separated by <PLUS>, for a
  relative distinguished name.

  Zero or more relative distinguished names, separated by <COMMA>, for a
  distinguished name.

  Implementations MUST recognize AttributeType name strings
  (descriptors) listed in the following table, but MAY recognize other
  name strings.

      String  X.500 AttributeType
      ------  --------------------------------------------
      CN      commonName (2.5.4.3)
      L       localityName (2.5.4.7)
      ST      stateOrProvinceName (2.5.4.8)
      O       organizationName (2.5.4.10)
      OU      organizationalUnitName (2.5.4.11)
      C       countryName (2.5.4.6)
      STREET  streetAddress (2.5.4.9)
      DC      domainComponent (0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25)
      UID     userId (0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1)

  Implementations MAY recognize other DN string representations (such as
  that described in RFC 1779).  However, as there is no requirement that
  alternative DN string representations to be recognized (and, if so,
  how), implementations SHOULD only generate DN strings in accordance
  with Section 2 of this document.


4.  Examples

  This notation is designed to be convenient for common forms of name.
  This section gives a few examples of distinguished names written using
  this notation.  First is a name containing three relative
  distinguished names (RDNs):

      UID=jsmith,DC=example,DC=net

  Here is an example name containing three RDNs, in which the first RDN
  is multi-valued:

      OU=Sales+CN=J. Smith,DC=example,DC=net



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 7]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


  This example shows the method of escaping of a special characters
  appearing in a common name:

      CN=James \"Jim\" Smith\, III,DC=example,DC=net

  The following shows the method for encoding a value which contains a
  carriage return character:

      CN=Before\0dAfter,DC=example,DC=net

  In this RDN example, the type in the RDN is unrecognized, and the
  value is the BER encoding of an OCTET STRING containing two octets
  0x48 and 0x69.

      1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.0=#04024869

  Finally, this example shows an RDN whose commonName value consisting
  of 5 letters:

      Unicode Character                Code       UTF-8   Escaped
      -------------------------------  ------     ------  --------
      LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L           U+004C     0x4C    L
      LATIN SMALL LETTER U             U+0075     0x75    u
      LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CARON  U+010D     0xC48D  \C4\8D
      LATIN SMALL LETTER I             U+0069     0x69    i
      LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH ACUTE  U+0107     0xC487  \C4\87

  could be encoded in printable ASCII (useful for debugging purposes)
  as:

      CN=Lu\C4\8Di\C4\87


5.  Security Considerations

  The following security considerations are specific to the handling of
  distinguished names.  LDAP security considerations are discussed in
  [Protocol] and other documents comprising the LDAP Technical
  Specification [Roadmap].


5.1. Disclosure

  Distinguished Names typically consist of descriptive information about
  the entries they name, which can be people, organizations, devices or
  other real-world objects.  This frequently includes some of the
  following kinds of information:




Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 8]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


    - the common name of the object (i.e. a person's full name)
    - an email or TCP/IP address
    - its physical location (country, locality, city, street address)
    - organizational attributes (such as department name or affiliation)

  In some cases, such information can be considered sensitive.  In many
  countries, privacy laws exist which prohibit disclosure of certain
  kinds of descriptive information (e.g., email addresses).  Hence,
  servers implementors are encouraged to support DIT structural rules
  and name forms [Models] as these provide a mechanism for
  administrators to select appropriate naming attributes for entries.
  Administrators are encouraged to use these mechanisms, access
  controls, and other administrative controls which may be available to
  restrict use of attributes containing sensitive information in naming
  of entries.   Additionally, use of authentication and data security
  services in LDAP [AuthMeth][Protocol] should be considered.


5.2. Use of Distinguished Names in Security Applications

  The transformations of an AttributeValue value from its X.501 form to
  an LDAP string representation are not always reversible back to the
  same BER (Basic Encoding Rules) or DER (Distinguished Encoding rules)
  form.  An example of a situation which requires the DER form of a
  distinguished name is the verification of an X.509 certificate.

  For example, a distinguished name consisting of one RDN with one AVA,
  in which the type is commonName and the value is of the TeletexString
  choice with the letters 'Sam' would be represented in LDAP as the
  string <CN=Sam>.  Another distinguished name in which the value is
  still 'Sam' but of the PrintableString choice would have the same
  representation <CN=Sam>.

  Applications which require the reconstruction of the DER form of the
  value SHOULD NOT use the string representation of attribute syntaxes
  when converting a distinguished name to the LDAP format.  Instead,
  they SHOULD use the hexadecimal form prefixed by the number sign ('#'
  U+0023) as described in the first paragraph of Section 2.4.


6.  Acknowledgment

  This document is an update to RFC 2253, by Mark Wahl, Tim Howes, and
  Steve Kille.  RFC 2253 was a product of the IETF ASID Working Group.

  This document is a product of the IETF LDAPBIS Working Group.





Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names               [Page 9]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


7. Document Editor's Address

  Kurt D. Zeilenga
  OpenLDAP Foundation

  Email: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org


8. References

  [[Note to the RFC Editor: please replace the citation tags used in
  referencing Internet-Drafts with tags of the form RFCnnnn where
  possible.]]


8.1. Normative References

  [X.501]       International Telecommunication Union -
                Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The Directory
                -- Models," X.501(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-2:1994).

  [X.680]       International Telecommunication Union -
                Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Abstract
                Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) - Specification of Basic
                Notation", X.680(1997) (also ISO/IEC 8824-1:1998).

  [RFC2119]     Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
                Requirement Levels", BCP 14 (also RFC 2119), March 1997.

  [RFC2234]     Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
                Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997.

  [RFC3629]     Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
                10646", RFC 3629 (also STD 63), November 2003.

  [Unicode]     The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version
                3.2.0" is defined by "The Unicode Standard, Version 3.0"
                (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2000. ISBN 0-201-61633-5),
                as amended by the "Unicode Standard Annex #27: Unicode
                3.1" (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr27/) and by the
                "Unicode Standard Annex #28: Unicode 3.2"
                (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr28/).

  [Models]      Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Directory Information
                Models", draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-xx.txt, a work in
                progress.

  [Roadmap]     Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Technical Specification



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names              [Page 10]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


                Road Map", draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in
                progress.

  [Protocol]    Sermersheim, J. (editor), "LDAP: The Protocol",
                draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-xx.txt, a work in progress.

  [Syntaxes]    Legg, S. (editor), "LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules",
                draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-xx.txt, a work in progress.

  [Schema]      Dally, K. (editor), "LDAP: User Schema",
                draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-xx.txt, a work in
                progress.

  [REGISTRY]    IANA, Object Identifier Descriptors Registry,
                <http://www.iana.org/...>.

8.2. Informative References

  [ASCII]       Coded Character Set--7-bit American Standard Code for
                Information Interchange, ANSI X3.4-1986.

  [X.500]       International Telecommunication Union -
                Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The Directory
                -- Overview of concepts, models and services,"
                X.500(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-1:1994).

  [X.690]       International Telecommunication Union -
                Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Specification
                of ASN.1 encoding rules: Basic Encoding Rules (BER),
                Canonical Encoding Rules (CER), and Distinguished
                Encoding Rules (DER)", X.690(1997) (also ISO/IEC
                8825-1:1998).

  [RFC2849]     Good, G., "The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) -
                Technical Specification", RFC 2849, June 2000.

  [BCP64bis]    Zeilenga, K., "IANA Considerations for LDAP",
                draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-xx.txt, a work in progress.

  [CharModel]   Whistler, K. and M. Davis, "Unicode Technical Report
                #17, Character Encoding Model", UTR17,
                <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr17/>, August
                2000.

  [Glossary]    The Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Glossary",
                <http://www.unicode.org/glossary/>.





Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names              [Page 11]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


Appendix A.   Presentation Issues

  This appendix is provided for informational purposes only, it is not a
  normative part of this specification.

  The string representation described in this document is not intended
  to be presented to humans without translation.  However, at times it
  may be desirable to present non-translated DN strings to users.  This
  section discusses presentation issues associated with non-translated
  DN strings.  Presentation of translated DN strings issues are not
  discussed in this appendix.  Transcoding issues are also not discussed
  in this appendix.

  This appendix provides guidance for applications presenting DN strings
  to users.  This section is not comprehensive, it does not discuss all
  presentation issues which implementors may face.

  Not all user interfaces are capable of displaying the full set of
  Unicode characters.  Some Unicode characters are not displayable.

  It is recommended that human interfaces use the optional hex pair
  escaping mechanism (Section 2.3) to produce a string representation
  suitable for display to the user.  For example, an application can
  generate a DN string for display which escapes all non-printable
  characters appearing in the AttributeValue's string representation (as
  demonstrated in the final example of Section 4).

  When a DN string is displayed in free form text, it is often necessary
  to distinguish the DN string from surrounding text.  While this is
  often done with white space (as demonstrated in Section 4), it is
  noted that DN strings may end with white space.  Careful readers of
  Section 3 will note that characters '<' (U+003C) and '>' (U+003E) may
  only appear in the DN string if escaped.  These characters are
  intended to be used in free form text to distinguish a DN string from
  surrounding text.  For example, <CN=Sam\ > distinguished the string
  representation of the DN comprised of one RDN consisting of the AVA:
  the commonName (CN) value 'Sam ' from the surrounding text.  It should
  be noted to the user that the wrapping '<' and '>' characters are not
  part of the DN string.

  DN strings can be quite long.  It is often desirable to line-wrap
  overly long DN strings in presentations.  Line wrapping should be done
  by inserting white space after the RDN separator character or, if
  necessary, after the AVA separator character.  It should be noted to
  the user that the inserted white space is not part of the DN string
  and is to be removed before use in LDAP.  For example,

      The following DN string is long:



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names              [Page 12]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


          CN=Kurt D. Zeilenga,OU=Engineering,L=Redwood Shores,
          O=OpenLDAP Foundation,ST=California,C=US
      so it has been line-wrapped for readability.  The extra white
      space is to be removed before the DN string is used in LDAP.

  It is not advised to insert white space otherwise as it may not be
  obvious to the user which white space is part of the DN string and
  which white space was added for readability.

  Another alternative is to use the LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF)
  [RFC2849].  For example,

          # This entry has a long DN...
          dn: CN=Kurt D. Zeilenga,OU=Engineering,L=Redwood Shores,
           O=OpenLDAP Foundation,ST=California,C=US
          CN: Kurt D. Zeilenga
          SN: Zeilenga
          objectClass: person


Appendix B. Changes made since RFC 2253

  This appendix is provided for informational purposes only, it is not a
  normative part of this specification.

  The following substantive changes were made to RFC 2253:
    - Removed IESG Note.  The IESG Note has been addressed.
    - Replaced all references to ISO 10646-1 with [Unicode].
    - Clarified (in Section 1) that this document does not define a
      canonical string representation.
    - Clarified that Section 2 describes the RECOMMENDED encoding
      algorithm and that alternative algorithms are allowed.  Some
      encoding options described in RFC 2253 are now treated as
      alternative algorithms in this specification.
    - Revised specification (in Section 2) to allow short names of any
      registered attribute type to appear in string representations of
      DNs instead of being restricted to a "published table".  Remove
      "as an example" language.  Added statement (in Section 3) allowing
      recognition of additional names but require recognization of those
      names in the published table.  The table is now published in
      Section 3.
    - Removed specification of additional requirements for LDAPv2
      implementations which also support LDAPv3 (RFC 2253, Section 4) as
      LDAPv2 is now Historic.
    - Allow recognition of alternative string representations.
    - Updated Section 2.4 to allow hex pair escaping of all characters
      and clarified escaping for when multiple octet UTF-8 encodings are
      present.  Indicated that null (U+0000) character is to be escaped.



Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names              [Page 13]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


      Indicated that equals sign ('=' U+003D) character may be escaped
      as '\='.
    - Rewrote Section 3 to use ABNF as defined in RFC 2234.
    - Updated the Section 3 ABNF.  Changes include:
      + allow AttributeType short names of length 1 (e.g., 'L'),
      + use more restrictive <oid> production in AttributeTypes,
      + do not require escaping of equals sign ('=' U+003D) characters,
      + do not require escaping of non-leading number sign ('#' U+0023)
      characters,
      + allow space (' ' U+0020) to escaped as '\ ',
      + require hex escaping of null (U+0000) characters, and
      + removed LDAPv2-only constructs.
    - Updated Section 3 to describe how to parse elements of the
      grammar.
    - Rewrote examples.
    - Added reference to documentations containing general LDAP security
      considerations.
    - Added discussion of presentation issues (Appendix A).
    - Added this appendix.

  In addition, numerous editorial changes were made.


Intellectual Property Rights

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
  pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
  this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
  might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
  made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
  on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found
  in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
  assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
  attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
  such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification
  can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
  http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
  copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
  rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
  this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
  ietf-ipr@ietf.org.





Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names              [Page 14]
\f
INTERNET-DRAFT        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-16.txt      10 February 2005


Full Copyright

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This document is subject
  to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
  except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
  OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
  ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
  INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
  INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.






































Zeilenga                LDAP: Distinguished Names              [Page 15]
\f