<tscreen><verb>
; Reserve space for the larger of two data blocks
- savearea: .max (.sizeof (foo), .sizeof (bar))
+ savearea: .res .max (.sizeof (foo), .sizeof (bar))
</verb></tscreen>
See: <tt><ref id=".MIN" name=".MIN"></tt>
Example:
<tscreen><verb>
- ; Reserve space for some data, but 256 bytes minimum
- savearea: .min (.sizeof (foo), 256)
+ ; Reserve space for some data, but 256 bytes maximum
+ savearea: .res .min (.sizeof (foo), 256)
</verb></tscreen>
See: <tt><ref id=".MAX" name=".MAX"></tt>
some things may be done with both macro types, each type has special
usages. The types complement each other.
+<item> Parentheses work differently from C macros.
+ The common practice of wrapping C macros in parentheses may cause
+ unintended problems here, such as accidentally implying an
+ indirect addressing mode. While the definition of a macro requires
+ parentheses around its argument list, when invoked they should not be
+ included.
+
</itemize>
Let's look at a few examples to make the advantages and disadvantages
DEBUG "Assembling include file #3"
</verb></tscreen>
-Note that, while formal parameters have to be placed in braces, this is
-not true for the actual parameters. Beware: Since the assembler cannot
-detect the end of one parameter, only the first token is used. If you
-don't like that, use classic macros instead:
+Note that, while formal parameters have to be placed in parentheses,
+the actual argument used when invoking the macro should not be.
+The invoked arguments are separated by commas only, if parentheses are
+used by accident they will become part of the replaced token.
+
+If you wish to have an expression follow the macro invocation, the
+last parameter can be enclosed in curly braces {} to indicate the end of that
+argument.
+
+Examples:
<tscreen><verb>
-.macro DEBUG message
- .out message
-.endmacro
+.define COMBINE(ta,tb,tc) ta+tb*10+tc*100
+
+.word COMBINE 5,6,7 ; 5+6*10+7*100 = 765
+.word COMBINE(5,6,7) ; (5+6*10+7)*100 = 7200 ; incorrect use of parentheses
+.word COMBINE 5,6,7+1 ; 5+6*10+7+1*100 = 172
+.word COMBINE 5,6,{7}+1 ; 5+6*10+7*100+1 = 766 ; {} encloses the argument
+.word COMBINE 5,6-2,7 ; 5+6-2*10+7*100 = 691
+.word COMBINE 5,(6-2),7 ; 5+(6-2)*10+7*100 = 745
+.word COMBINE 5,6,7+COMBINE 0,1,2 ; 5+6*10+7+0+1*10+2*100*100 = 20082
+.word COMBINE 5,6,{7}+COMBINE 0,1,2 ; 5+6*10+7*100+0+1*10+2*100 = 975
</verb></tscreen>
-(That is an example where a problem can be solved with both macro types).
+With C macros it is common to enclose the results in parentheses to
+prevent unintended interactions with the text of the arguments, but
+additional care must be taken in this assembly context where parentheses
+may alter the meaning of a statement. In particular, indirect addressing modes
+may be accidentally implied:
+
+<tscreen><verb>
+.define DUO(ta,tb) (ta+(tb*10))
+
+ lda DUO(5,4), Y ; LDA (indirect), Y
+ lda 0+DUO(5,4), Y ; LDA absolute indexed, Y
+</verb></tscreen>
<sect1>Characters in macros<p>