X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=bacula%2Fprojects;h=0f997e0bf600dc5c4f4ec019c50e4c2708253739;hb=cdf1f277887756e94a8c663791e90ca1b39faf2a;hp=0cd172413dd2090ebe99b4e0527c01441f63c832;hpb=1ff1d36f1cc2df9d09a506ab138cf75507519969;p=bacula%2Fbacula diff --git a/bacula/projects b/bacula/projects index 0cd172413d..0f997e0bf6 100644 --- a/bacula/projects +++ b/bacula/projects @@ -1,994 +1,733 @@ Projects: Bacula Projects Roadmap - Prioritized by user vote 07 December 2005 - Status updated 30 July 2006 + Status updated 8 August 2010 Summary: -Item 1: Implement data encryption (as opposed to comm encryption) -Item 2: Implement Migration that moves Jobs from one Pool to another. -Item 3: Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted files from -Item 4: Implement a Bacula GUI/management tool using Python. -Item 5: Implement Base jobs. -Item 6: Allow FD to initiate a backup -Item 7: Improve Bacula's tape and drive usage and cleaning management. -Item 8: Implement creation and maintenance of copy pools -Item 9: Implement new {Client}Run{Before|After}Job feature. -Item 10: Merge multiple backups (Synthetic Backup or Consolidation). -Item 11: Deletion of Disk-Based Bacula Volumes -Item 12: Directive/mode to backup only file changes, not entire file -Item 13: Multiple threads in file daemon for the same job -Item 14: Implement red/black binary tree routines. -Item 15: Add support for FileSets in user directories CACHEDIR.TAG -Item 16: Implement extraction of Win32 BackupWrite data. -Item 17: Implement a Python interface to the Bacula catalog. -Item 18: Archival (removal) of User Files to Tape -Item 19: Add Plug-ins to the FileSet Include statements. -Item 20: Implement more Python events in Bacula. -Item 21: Quick release of FD-SD connection after backup. -Item 22: Permit multiple Media Types in an Autochanger -Item 23: Allow different autochanger definitions for one autochanger. -Item 24: Automatic disabling of devices -Item 25: Implement huge exclude list support using hashing. - - -Below, you will find more information on future projects: - -Item 1: Implement data encryption (as opposed to comm encryption) - Date: 28 October 2005 - Origin: Sponsored by Landon and 13 contributors to EFF. - Status: Done: Landon Fuller has implemented this in 1.39.x. - - What: Currently the data that is stored on the Volume is not - encrypted. For confidentiality, encryption of data at - the File daemon level is essential. - Data encryption encrypts the data in the File daemon and - decrypts the data in the File daemon during a restore. - - Why: Large sites require this. - -Item 2: Implement Migration that moves Jobs from one Pool to another. - Origin: Sponsored by Riege Software International GmbH. Contact: - Daniel Holtkamp - Date: 28 October 2005 - Status: 90% complete: Working in 1.39, more to do. Assigned to - Kern. - - What: The ability to copy, move, or archive data that is on a - device to another device is very important. - - Why: An ISP might want to backup to disk, but after 30 days - migrate the data to tape backup and delete it from - disk. Bacula should be able to handle this - automatically. It needs to know what was put where, - and when, and what to migrate -- it is a bit like - retention periods. Doing so would allow space to be - freed up for current backups while maintaining older - data on tape drives. - - Notes: Riege Software have asked for the following migration - triggers: - Age of Job - Highwater mark (stopped by Lowwater mark?) - - Notes: Migration could be additionally triggered by: - Number of Jobs - Number of Volumes - -Item 3: Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted files from - Incremental/Differential backups - Date: 28 November 2005 - Origin: Martin Simmons (martin at lispworks dot com) - Status: - - What: When restoring a fileset for a specified date (including "most - recent"), Bacula should give you exactly the files and directories - that existed at the time of the last backup prior to that date. - - Currently this only works if the last backup was a Full backup. - When the last backup was Incremental/Differential, files and - directories that have been renamed or deleted since the last Full - backup are not currently restored correctly. Ditto for files with - extra/fewer hard links than at the time of the last Full backup. - - Why: Incremental/Differential would be much more useful if this worked. - - Notes: Item 14 (Merging of multiple backups into a single one) seems to - rely on this working, otherwise the merged backups will not be - truly equivalent to a Full backup. - - Kern: notes shortened. This can be done without the need for - inodes. It is essentially the same as the current Verify job, - but one additional database record must be written, which does - not need any database change. - - Kern: see if we can correct restoration of directories if - replace=ifnewer is set. Currently, if the directory does not - exist, a "dummy" directory is created, then when all the files - are updated, the dummy directory is newer so the real values - are not updated. - -Item 4: Implement a Bacula GUI/management tool using Python. - Origin: Kern - Date: 28 October 2005 - Status: Lucus is working on this for Python GTK+. - - What: Implement a Bacula console, and management tools - using Python and Qt or GTK. - - Why: Don't we already have a wxWidgets GUI? Yes, but - it is written in C++ and changes to the user interface - must be hand tailored using C++ code. By developing - the user interface using Qt designer, the interface - can be very easily updated and most of the new Python - code will be automatically created. The user interface - changes become very simple, and only the new features - must be implement. In addition, the code will be in - Python, which will give many more users easy (or easier) - access to making additions or modifications. - - Notes: This is currently being implemented using Python-GTK by - Lucas Di Pentima - -Item 5: Implement Base jobs. - Date: 28 October 2005 - Origin: Kern - Status: +* => item complete + +Item 1: Ability to restart failed jobs +Item 2: SD redesign +Item* 3: NDMP backup/restore +Item 4: SAP backup/restore +Item 5: Oracle backup/restore +Item 6: Zimbra and Zarafa backup/restore +Item* 7: Include timestamp of job launch in "stat clients" output +Item 8: Include all conf files in specified directory +Item 9: Reduction of communications bandwidth for a backup +Item 10: Concurrent spooling and despooling within a single job. +Item 11: Start spooling even when waiting on tape +Item*12: Add ability to Verify any specified Job. +Item 13: Data encryption on storage daemon +Item 14: Possibilty to schedule Jobs on last Friday of the month +Item 15: Scheduling syntax that permits more flexibility and options +Item 16: Ability to defer Batch Insert to a later time +Item 17: Add MaxVolumeSize/MaxVolumeBytes to Storage resource +Item 18: Message mailing based on backup types +Item 19: Handle Windows Encrypted Files using Win raw encryption +Item 20: Job migration between different SDs +Item 19. Allow FD to initiate a backup +Item 21: Implement Storage daemon compression +Item 22: Ability to import/export Bacula database entities +Item*23: Implementation of running Job speed limit. +Item 24: Add an override in Schedule for Pools based on backup types +Item 25: Automatic promotion of backup levels based on backup size +Item 26: Allow FileSet inclusion/exclusion by creation/mod times +Item 27: Archival (removal) of User Files to Tape +Item 28: Ability to reconnect a disconnected comm line +Item 29: Multiple threads in file daemon for the same job +Item 30: Automatic disabling of devices +Item 31: Enable persistent naming/number of SQL queries +Item 32: Bacula Dir, FD and SD to support proxies +Item 33: Add Minumum Spool Size directive +Item 34: Command that releases all drives in an autochanger +Item 35: Run bscan on a remote storage daemon from within bconsole. +Item 36: Implement a Migration job type that will create a reverse +Item 37: Separate "Storage" and "Device" in the bacula-dir.conf +Item 38: Least recently used device selection for tape drives in autochanger. +Item 39: Implement a Storage device like Amazon's S3. +Item*40: Convert tray monitor on Windows to a stand alone program +Item 41: Improve Bacula's tape and drive usage and cleaning management +Item 42: Relabel disk volume after recycling + +Item 1: Ability to restart failed jobs + Date: 26 April 2009 + Origin: Kern/Eric + Status: + + What: Often jobs fail because of a communications line drop or max run time, + cancel, or some other non-critical problem. Currrently any data + saved is lost. This implementation should modify the Storage daemon + so that it saves all the files that it knows are completely backed + up to the Volume + + The jobs should then be marked as incomplete and a subsequent + Incremental Accurate backup will then take into account all the + previously saved job. + + Why: Avoids backuping data already saved. + + Notes: Requires Accurate to restart correctly. Must completed have a minimum + volume of data or files stored on Volume before enabling. + +Item 2: SD redesign + Date: 8 August 2010 + Origin: Kern + Status: + + What: Various ideas for redesigns planned for the SD: + 1. One thread per drive + 2. Design a class structure for all objects in the SD. + 3. Make Device into C++ classes for each device type + 4. Make Device have a proxy (front end intercept class) that will permit control over locking and changing the real device pointer. It can also permit delaying opening, so that we can adapt to having another program that tells us the Archive device name. + 5. Allow plugins to create new on the fly devices + 6. Separate SD volume manager + 7. Volume manager tells Bacula what drive or device to use for a given volume - What: A base job is sort of like a Full save except that you - will want the FileSet to contain only files that are - unlikely to change in the future (i.e. a snapshot of - most of your system after installing it). After the - base job has been run, when you are doing a Full save, - you specify one or more Base jobs to be used. All - files that have been backed up in the Base job/jobs but - not modified will then be excluded from the backup. - During a restore, the Base jobs will be automatically - pulled in where necessary. - - Why: This is something none of the competition does, as far as - we know (except perhaps BackupPC, which is a Perl program that - saves to disk only). It is big win for the user, it - makes Bacula stand out as offering a unique - optimization that immediately saves time and money. - Basically, imagine that you have 100 nearly identical - Windows or Linux machine containing the OS and user - files. Now for the OS part, a Base job will be backed - up once, and rather than making 100 copies of the OS, - there will be only one. If one or more of the systems - have some files updated, no problem, they will be - automatically restored. - - Notes: Huge savings in tape usage even for a single machine. - Will require more resources because the DIR must send - FD a list of files/attribs, and the FD must search the - list and compare it for each file to be saved. - -Item 6: Allow FD to initiate a backup - Origin: Frank Volf (frank at deze dot org) - Date: 17 November 2005 - Status: + Why: It will simplify the SD, make it more modular, reduce locking + conflicts, and allow multiple buffer backups. - What: Provide some means, possibly by a restricted console that - allows a FD to initiate a backup, and that uses the connection - established by the FD to the Director for the backup so that - a Director that is firewalled can do the backup. - Why: Makes backup of laptops much easier. +Item 3: NDMP backup/restore + Date: 8 August 2010 + Origin: Bacula Systems + Status: Enterprise only if implemented by Bacula Systems -Item 7: Improve Bacula's tape and drive usage and cleaning management. - Date: 8 November 2005, November 11, 2005 - Origin: Adam Thornton , - Arno Lehmann - Status: + What: Backup/restore via NDMP -- most important NetApp compatibility - What: Make Bacula manage tape life cycle information, tape reuse - times and drive cleaning cycles. - - Why: All three parts of this project are important when operating - backups. - We need to know which tapes need replacement, and we need to - make sure the drives are cleaned when necessary. While many - tape libraries and even autoloaders can handle all this - automatically, support by Bacula can be helpful for smaller - (older) libraries and single drives. Limiting the number of - times a tape is used might prevent tape errors when using - tapes until the drives can't read it any more. Also, checking - drive status during operation can prevent some failures (as I - [Arno] had to learn the hard way...) - - Notes: First, Bacula could (and even does, to some limited extent) - record tape and drive usage. For tapes, the number of mounts, - the amount of data, and the time the tape has actually been - running could be recorded. Data fields for Read and Write - time and Number of mounts already exist in the catalog (I'm - not sure if VolBytes is the sum of all bytes ever written to - that volume by Bacula). This information can be important - when determining which media to replace. The ability to mark - Volumes as "used up" after a given number of write cycles - should also be implemented so that a tape is never actually - worn out. For the tape drives known to Bacula, similar - information is interesting to determine the device status and - expected life time: Time it's been Reading and Writing, number - of tape Loads / Unloads / Errors. This information is not yet - recorded as far as I [Arno] know. A new volume status would - be necessary for the new state, like "Used up" or "Worn out". - Volumes with this state could be used for restores, but not - for writing. These volumes should be migrated first (assuming - migration is implemented) and, once they are no longer needed, - could be moved to a Trash pool. - - The next step would be to implement a drive cleaning setup. - Bacula already has knowledge about cleaning tapes. Once it - has some information about cleaning cycles (measured in drive - run time, number of tapes used, or calender days, for example) - it can automatically execute tape cleaning (with an - autochanger, obviously) or ask for operator assistance loading - a cleaning tape. - - The final step would be to implement TAPEALERT checks not only - when changing tapes and only sending the information to the - administrator, but rather checking after each tape error, - checking on a regular basis (for example after each tape - file), and also before unloading and after loading a new tape. - Then, depending on the drives TAPEALERT state and the known - drive cleaning state Bacula could automatically schedule later - cleaning, clean immediately, or inform the operator. - - Implementing this would perhaps require another catalog change - and perhaps major changes in SD code and the DIR-SD protocol, - so I'd only consider this worth implementing if it would - actually be used or even needed by many people. - - Implementation of these projects could happen in three distinct - sub-projects: Measuring Tape and Drive usage, retiring - volumes, and handling drive cleaning and TAPEALERTs. - -Item 8: Implement creation and maintenance of copy pools - Date: 27 November 2005 - Origin: David Boyes (dboyes at sinenomine dot net) - Status: - What: I would like Bacula to have the capability to write copies - of backed-up data on multiple physical volumes selected - from different pools without transferring the data - multiple times, and to accept any of the copy volumes - as valid for restore. - - Why: In many cases, businesses are required to keep offsite - copies of backup volumes, or just wish for simple - protection against a human operator dropping a storage - volume and damaging it. The ability to generate multiple - volumes in the course of a single backup job allows - customers to simple check out one copy and send it - offsite, marking it as out of changer or otherwise - unavailable. Currently, the library and magazine - management capability in Bacula does not make this process - simple. - - Restores would use the copy of the data on the first - available volume, in order of copy pool chain definition. - - This is also a major scalability issue -- as the number of - clients increases beyond several thousand, and the volume - of data increases, transferring the data multiple times to - produce additional copies of the backups will become - physically impossible due to transfer speed - issues. Generating multiple copies at server side will - become the only practical option. - - How: I suspect that this will require adding a multiplexing - SD that appears to be a SD to a specific FD, but 1-n FDs - to the specific back end SDs managing the primary and copy - pools. Storage pools will also need to acquire parameters - to define the pools to be used for copies. - - Notes: I would commit some of my developers' time if we can agree - on the design and behavior. - -Item 9: Implement new {Client}Run{Before|After}Job feature. - Date: 26 September 2005 - Origin: Phil Stracchino - Status: Done. This has been implemented by Eric Bollengier - - What: Some time ago, there was a discussion of RunAfterJob and - ClientRunAfterJob, and the fact that they do not run after failed - jobs. At the time, there was a suggestion to add a - RunAfterFailedJob directive (and, presumably, a matching - ClientRunAfterFailedJob directive), but to my knowledge these - were never implemented. - - The current implementation doesn't permit to add new feature easily. - - An alternate way of approaching the problem has just occurred to - me. Suppose the RunBeforeJob and RunAfterJob directives were - expanded in a manner like this example: - - RunScript { - Command = "/opt/bacula/etc/checkhost %c" - RunsOnClient = No # default - AbortJobOnError = Yes # default - RunsWhen = Before - } - RunScript { - Command = c:/bacula/systemstate.bat - RunsOnClient = yes - AbortJobOnError = No - RunsWhen = After - RunsOnFailure = yes - } - RunScript { - Command = c:/bacula/deletestatefile.bat - Target = rico-fd - RunsWhen = Always - } +Item 4: SAP backup/restore + Date: 8 August 2010 + Origin: Bacula Systems + Status: Enterprise only if implemented by Bacula Systems - It's now possible to specify more than 1 command per Job. - (you can stop your database and your webserver without a script) - - ex : - Job { - Name = "Client1" - JobDefs = "DefaultJob" - Write Bootstrap = "/tmp/bacula/var/bacula/working/Client1.bsr" - FileSet = "Minimal" - - RunBeforeJob = "echo test before ; echo test before2" - RunBeforeJob = "echo test before (2nd time)" - RunBeforeJob = "echo test before (3rd time)" - RunAfterJob = "echo test after" - ClientRunAfterJob = "echo test after client" - - RunScript { - Command = "echo test RunScript in error" - Runsonclient = yes - RunsOnSuccess = no - RunsOnFailure = yes - RunsWhen = After # never by default - } - RunScript { - Command = "echo test RunScript on success" - Runsonclient = yes - RunsOnSuccess = yes # default - RunsOnFailure = no # default - RunsWhen = After - } - } + What: Backup/restore SAP databases (MaxDB, Oracle, possibly DB2) - Why: It would be a significant change to the structure of the - directives, but allows for a lot more flexibility, including - RunAfter commands that will run regardless of whether the job - succeeds, or RunBefore tasks that still allow the job to run even - if that specific RunBefore fails. - - Notes: (More notes from Phil, Kern, David and Eric) - I would prefer to have a single new Resource called - RunScript. - - RunsWhen = After|Before|Always - RunsAtJobLevels = All|Full|Diff|Inc # not yet implemented - - The AbortJobOnError, RunsOnSuccess and RunsOnFailure directives - could be optional, and possibly RunWhen as well. - - AbortJobOnError would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to Before - and would default to Yes if omitted. - If AbortJobOnError was set to No, failure of the script - would still generate a warning. - - RunsOnSuccess would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to After - (or RunsBeforeJob set to No), and default to Yes. - - RunsOnFailure would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to After, - and default to No. - - Allow having the before/after status on the script command - line so that the same script can be used both before/after. - -Item 10: Merge multiple backups (Synthetic Backup or Consolidation). - Origin: Marc Cousin and Eric Bollengier - Date: 15 November 2005 - Status: Waiting implementation. Depends on first implementing - project Item 2 (Migration). - - What: A merged backup is a backup made without connecting to the Client. - It would be a Merge of existing backups into a single backup. - In effect, it is like a restore but to the backup medium. - - For instance, say that last Sunday we made a full backup. Then - all week long, we created incremental backups, in order to do - them fast. Now comes Sunday again, and we need another full. - The merged backup makes it possible to do instead an incremental - backup (during the night for instance), and then create a merged - backup during the day, by using the full and incrementals from - the week. The merged backup will be exactly like a full made - Sunday night on the tape, but the production interruption on the - Client will be minimal, as the Client will only have to send - incrementals. - - In fact, if it's done correctly, you could merge all the - Incrementals into single Incremental, or all the Incrementals - and the last Differential into a new Differential, or the Full, - last differential and all the Incrementals into a new Full - backup. And there is no need to involve the Client. - - Why: The benefit is that : - - the Client just does an incremental ; - - the merged backup on tape is just as a single full backup, - and can be restored very fast. - - This is also a way of reducing the backup data since the old - data can then be pruned (or not) from the catalog, possibly - allowing older volumes to be recycled - -Item 11: Deletion of Disk-Based Bacula Volumes - Date: Nov 25, 2005 - Origin: Ross Boylan (edited - by Kern) - Status: - - What: Provide a way for Bacula to automatically remove Volumes - from the filesystem, or optionally to truncate them. - Obviously, the Volume must be pruned prior removal. - - Why: This would allow users more control over their Volumes and - prevent disk based volumes from consuming too much space. - - Notes: The following two directives might do the trick: - - Volume Data Retention =