jtagspi: new protocol that includes transfer length
This commit contains a rewrite of the jtagspi protocol and covers both
changes in the jtagspi.c openocd driver and the bscan_spi
(xilinx_bscan_spi) proxy bitstreams. The changes are as follows:
1. Always perform IR scan to ensure proper clearing of BYPASSed DRs.
2. Insert alignment cycles for all BYPASSed TAPs:
The previous logic was erroneous. The delay in clock cyles from a bit
written to the jtag interface to a bit read by the jtag interface is:
* The number of BYPASSed TAPs before this (jtagspi) tap
* The length of the jtagspi data register (1)
* The number of BYPASSed TAPs before this one.
I.e. it is just the number of enabled TAPs. This also gets rid of the
configuration parameter DR_LENGTH.
3. Use marker bit to start spi transfer
If there are TAPs ahead of this one on the JTAG chain, and we are in
DR-SHIFT, there will be old bits toggled through first before the first
valid bit destined for the flash.
This delays the begin of the JTAGSPI transaction until the first high bit.
4. New jtagspi protocol
A JTAGSPI transfer now consists of:
* an arbitrary number of 0 bits (from BYPASS registers in front of the
JTAG2SPI DR)
* a marker bit (1) indicating the start of the JTAG2SPI transaction
* 32 bits (big endian) describing the length of the SPI transaction
* a number of SPI clock cycles (corresponding to 3.) with CS_N asserted
* an arbitrary number of cycles (to shift MISO/TDO data through
subsequent BYPASS registers)
5. xilinx_bscan_spi: clean up, add ultrascale
This is tested on the following configurations:
* KC705: XC7K325T
* Sayma AMC: XCKU040
* Sayma AMC + RTM): XCKU040 + XC7A15T, a board with integrated FTDI JTAG
adapter, SCANSTA JTAG router, a Xilinx Ultrascale XCKU040 and a Xilinx
Artix 7 15T. https://github.com/m-labs/sinara/wiki/Sayma
* Custom board with Lattice FPGA + XC7A35T
* CUstom board with 3x XCKU115-2FLVA1517E
Change-Id: I7361e9fb284ebb916302941735eebef3612aa103 Signed-off-by: Robert Jordens <jordens@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4236 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>