My recent decision to reuse the character specification table from the base target...

My recent decision to reuse the character specification table from the base target was based on the fact that CBM GEOS used a copy of the CBM character specification table for the last ten years.
However now I understand that CBM GEOS does _not_ use PETSCII so the CBM character specification table doesn't make sense at all. After all this is very plausible because GEOS wants to enable the user to share his files across GEOS variants - so we can share the character specification table too.

git-svn-id: svn://svn.cc65.org/cc65/trunk@5527 b7a2c559-68d2-44c3-8de9-860c34a00d81