]> git.sur5r.net Git - openldap/commitdiff
cleanup
authorPierangelo Masarati <ando@openldap.org>
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:31:38 +0000 (00:31 +0000)
committerPierangelo Masarati <ando@openldap.org>
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:31:38 +0000 (00:31 +0000)
servers/slapd/back-ldap/chain.c

index 399278f9a0e59d15fa6e61dbfc0a93550a80b4d2..a2051d912ca9e3e011d1a8c52df165492ccd59c6 100644 (file)
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int
 ldap_chain_op(
        Operation       *op,
        SlapReply       *rs,
-       int             ( *op_f )( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs ), 
+       BI_op_func      *op_f,
        BerVarray       ref )
 {
        slap_overinst   *on = (slap_overinst *) op->o_bd->bd_info;
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ Document: draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-27.txt
                        }
                }
 
-               rc = ( *op_f )( op, rs );
+               rc = op_f( op, rs );
 
 cleanup:;
                ldap_memfree( li.li_uri );
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ cleanup:;
                /* FIXME: ldap_back_extended() by design 
                 * doesn't send result; frontend is expected
                 * to send it... */
-               /* FIXME: what aboit chaining? */
+               /* FIXME: what about chaining? */
                if ( rc != SLAPD_ABANDON ) {
                        send_ldap_extended( op, rs );
                        rc = LDAP_SUCCESS;
@@ -771,9 +771,11 @@ cleanup:;
        case LDAP_SUCCESS:
        case LDAP_REFERRAL:
                /* slapd-ldap sent response */
-               if ( !op->o_abandon ) {
+               if ( !op->o_abandon && sc2.sc_private != LDAP_CH_RES ) {
                        /* FIXME: should we send response? */
-                       Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_ANY, "%s: ldap_chain_response: overlay should have sent result.\n",
+                       Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_ANY,
+                               "%s: ldap_chain_response: "
+                               "overlay should have sent result.\n",
                                op->o_log_prefix, 0, 0 );
                }
                break;