Notes: I would commit some of my developers' time if we can agree
on the design and behavior.
- Notes: I get the idea, but would like more details on the precise
- syntax of the necessary directives and what they would do.
+ Notes: Additional notes from David:
+ I think there's two areas where new configuration would be needed.
+
+ 1) Identify a "SD mux" SD (specify it in the config just like a normal
+ SD. The SD configuration would need something like a "Daemon Type =
+ Normal/Mux" keyword to identify it as a multiplexor. (The director code
+ would need modification to add the ability to do the multiple session
+ setup, but the impact of the change would be new code that was invoked
+ only when a SDmux is needed).
+
+ 2) Additional keywords in the Pool definition to identify the need to
+ create copies. Each pool would acquire a Copypool= attribute (may be
+ repeated to generate more than one copy. 3 is about the practical limit,
+ but no point in hardcoding that).
+
+ Example:
+ Pool {
+ Name = Primary
+ Pool Type = Backup
+ Copypool = Copy1
+ Copypool = OffsiteCopy2
+ }
+
+ where Copy1 and OffsiteCopy2 are valid pools.
+
+ In terms of function (shorthand):
+ Backup job X is defined normally, specifying pool Primary as the pool to
+ use. Job gets scheduled, and Bacula starts scheduling resources.
+ Scheduler looks at pool definition for Primary, sees that there are a
+ non-zero number of copypool keywords. The director then connects to an
+ available SDmux, passes it the pool ids for Primary, Copy1, and
+ OffsiteCopy2 and waits. SDmux then goes out and reserves devices and
+ volumes in the normal SDs that serve Primary, Copy1 and OffsiteCopy2.
+ When all are ready, the SDmux signals ready back to the director, and
+ the FD is given the address of the SDmux as the SD to communicate with.
+ Backup proceeds normally, with the SDmux duplicating blocks to each
+ connected normal SD, and returning ready when all defined copies have
+ been written. At EOJ, FD shuts down connection with SDmux, which closes
+ down the normal SD connections and goes back to an idle state.
+ SDmux does not update database; normal SDs do (noting that file is
+ present on each volume it has been written to).
+
+ On restore, director looks for the volume containing the file in pool
+ Primary first, then Copy1, then OffsiteCopy2. If the volume holding the
+ file in pool Primary is missing or busy (being written in another job,
+ etc), or one of the volumes from the copypool list that have the file in
+ question is already mounted and ready for some reason, use it to do the
+ restore, else mount one of the copypool volumes and proceed.
Item 9: Scheduling syntax that permits more flexibility and options