From: rtel Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:55:50 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Implementation of mutex held counting in tasks.c - needs optimisation before release. X-Git-Tag: V8.1.0~28 X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=051d2f77386bbcaf7d53d7540237593015fc21d4;p=freertos Implementation of mutex held counting in tasks.c - needs optimisation before release. git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freertos/code/trunk@2264 1d2547de-c912-0410-9cb9-b8ca96c0e9e2 --- diff --git a/FreeRTOS/Source/tasks.c b/FreeRTOS/Source/tasks.c index 06e08d3fe..0147ad0b0 100644 --- a/FreeRTOS/Source/tasks.c +++ b/FreeRTOS/Source/tasks.c @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ typedef struct tskTaskControlBlock #if ( configUSE_MUTEXES == 1 ) UBaseType_t uxBasePriority; /*< The priority last assigned to the task - used by the priority inheritance mechanism. */ + UBaseType_t uxMutexesHeld; #endif #if ( configUSE_APPLICATION_TASK_TAG == 1 ) @@ -2737,6 +2738,7 @@ UBaseType_t x; #if ( configUSE_MUTEXES == 1 ) { pxTCB->uxBasePriority = uxPriority; + pxTCB->uxMutexesHeld = 0; } #endif /* configUSE_MUTEXES */ @@ -3235,41 +3237,57 @@ TCB_t *pxTCB; #if ( configUSE_MUTEXES == 1 ) - void vTaskPriorityDisinherit( TaskHandle_t const pxMutexHolder ) + BaseType_t xTaskPriorityDisinherit( TaskHandle_t const pxMutexHolder ) { TCB_t * const pxTCB = ( TCB_t * ) pxMutexHolder; + BaseType_t xReturn = pdFALSE; if( pxMutexHolder != NULL ) { if( pxTCB->uxPriority != pxTCB->uxBasePriority ) { - /* We must be the running task to be able to give the mutex back. - Remove ourselves from the ready list we currently appear in. */ - if( uxListRemove( &( pxTCB->xGenericListItem ) ) == ( UBaseType_t ) 0 ) + /* Only disinherit if no other mutexes are held. */ + if( pxTCB->uxMutexesHeld == 0 ) { - taskRESET_READY_PRIORITY( pxTCB->uxPriority ); - } - else - { - mtCOVERAGE_TEST_MARKER(); - } + /* The holding task must be the running task to be able to give + the mutex back. Remove the holding task from the ready list. */ + if( uxListRemove( &( pxTCB->xGenericListItem ) ) == ( UBaseType_t ) 0 ) + { + taskRESET_READY_PRIORITY( pxTCB->uxPriority ); + } + else + { + mtCOVERAGE_TEST_MARKER(); + } - /* Disinherit the priority before adding the task into the new - ready list. */ - traceTASK_PRIORITY_DISINHERIT( pxTCB, pxTCB->uxBasePriority ); - pxTCB->uxPriority = pxTCB->uxBasePriority; + /* Disinherit the priority before adding the task into the new + ready list. */ + traceTASK_PRIORITY_DISINHERIT( pxTCB, pxTCB->uxBasePriority ); + pxTCB->uxPriority = pxTCB->uxBasePriority; - /* Only reset the event list item value if the value is not - being used for anything else. */ - if( ( listGET_LIST_ITEM_VALUE( &( pxTCB->xEventListItem ) ) & taskEVENT_LIST_ITEM_VALUE_IN_USE ) == 0UL ) - { - listSET_LIST_ITEM_VALUE( &( pxTCB->xEventListItem ), ( TickType_t ) configMAX_PRIORITIES - ( TickType_t ) pxTCB->uxPriority ); /*lint !e961 MISRA exception as the casts are only redundant for some ports. */ + /* Only reset the event list item value if the value is not + being used for anything else. */ + if( ( listGET_LIST_ITEM_VALUE( &( pxTCB->xEventListItem ) ) & taskEVENT_LIST_ITEM_VALUE_IN_USE ) == 0UL ) + { + listSET_LIST_ITEM_VALUE( &( pxTCB->xEventListItem ), ( TickType_t ) configMAX_PRIORITIES - ( TickType_t ) pxTCB->uxPriority ); /*lint !e961 MISRA exception as the casts are only redundant for some ports. */ + } + else + { +#warning Is it possible to come through here? + mtCOVERAGE_TEST_MARKER(); + } + prvAddTaskToReadyList( pxTCB ); + + /* Return true to indicate that a context switch is required. + This is only actually required in the corner case whereby + multiple mutexes were held and the mutexes were given back + in an order different to that in which they were taken. */ + xReturn = pdTRUE; } else { mtCOVERAGE_TEST_MARKER(); } - prvAddTaskToReadyList( pxTCB ); } else { @@ -3280,6 +3298,8 @@ TCB_t *pxTCB; { mtCOVERAGE_TEST_MARKER(); } + + return xReturn; } #endif /* configUSE_MUTEXES */ @@ -3294,6 +3314,18 @@ TCB_t *pxTCB; if( xSchedulerRunning != pdFALSE ) { ( pxCurrentTCB->uxCriticalNesting )++; + + /* This is not the interrupt safe version of the enter critical + function so assert() if it is being called from an interrupt + context. Only API functions that end in "FromISR" can be used in an + interrupt. Only assert if the critical nesting count is 1 to + protect against recursive calls if the assert function also uses a + critical section. */ + if( pxCurrentTCB->uxCriticalNesting == 1 ) + { + portASSERT_IF_IN_ISR(); + } + } else { @@ -3557,6 +3589,18 @@ TickType_t uxReturn; } /*-----------------------------------------------------------*/ +void vTaskIncrementMutexHeldCount( void ) +{ + ( pxCurrentTCB->uxMutexesHeld )++; +} +/*-----------------------------------------------------------*/ + +void vTaskDecrementMutexHeldCount( void ) +{ + configASSERT( pxCurrentTCB->uxMutexesHeld ); + ( pxCurrentTCB->uxMutexesHeld )--; +} + #ifdef FREERTOS_MODULE_TEST #include "tasks_test_access_functions.h" #endif