From: Alexey Brodkin Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:30:35 +0000 (+0400) Subject: drivers/designware_i2c - add suppor of CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW X-Git-Tag: v2014.01~12^2~1 X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=32d041e218c6a22e92d91629902fd03a90934b6a;p=u-boot drivers/designware_i2c - add suppor of CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW Since we agreed on legacy implementation of "eeprom_{read|write}" (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/295825/) I had to fix/make it work again DesignWare I2C driver for cases when 1 EEPROM IC fake I2C with anumber of "built-in" ICs with different chip addresses. Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin Cc: Tom Rini cc: Armando Visconti Cc: Stefan Roese Cc: Albert ARIBAUD Cc: Heiko Schocher Cc: Vipin KUMAR Cc: Tom Rix Cc: Mischa Jonker Cc: Kuo-Jung Su --- diff --git a/drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c index cb2ac04b60..9ed929521a 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c @@ -266,6 +266,25 @@ int i2c_read(uchar chip, uint addr, int alen, uchar *buffer, int len) { unsigned long start_time_rx; +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW + /* + * EEPROM chips that implement "address overflow" are ones + * like Catalyst 24WC04/08/16 which has 9/10/11 bits of + * address and the extra bits end up in the "chip address" + * bit slots. This makes a 24WC08 (1Kbyte) chip look like + * four 256 byte chips. + * + * Note that we consider the length of the address field to + * still be one byte because the extra address bits are + * hidden in the chip address. + */ + chip |= ((addr >> (alen * 8)) & CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW); + addr &= ~(CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW << (alen * 8)); + + debug("%s: fix addr_overflow: chip %02x addr %02x\n", __func__, chip, + addr); +#endif + if (check_params(addr, alen, buffer, len)) return 1; @@ -307,6 +326,25 @@ int i2c_write(uchar chip, uint addr, int alen, uchar *buffer, int len) int nb = len; unsigned long start_time_tx; +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW + /* + * EEPROM chips that implement "address overflow" are ones + * like Catalyst 24WC04/08/16 which has 9/10/11 bits of + * address and the extra bits end up in the "chip address" + * bit slots. This makes a 24WC08 (1Kbyte) chip look like + * four 256 byte chips. + * + * Note that we consider the length of the address field to + * still be one byte because the extra address bits are + * hidden in the chip address. + */ + chip |= ((addr >> (alen * 8)) & CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW); + addr &= ~(CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW << (alen * 8)); + + debug("%s: fix addr_overflow: chip %02x addr %02x\n", __func__, chip, + addr); +#endif + if (check_params(addr, alen, buffer, len)) return 1;