From: zwelch Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:13:24 +0000 (+0000) Subject: David Brownell : X-Git-Tag: v0.2.0~523 X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5120d1263bf22c5f426333fd28f27216dacf2b56;p=openocd David Brownell : Whitespace fixes in jtag.c ... mostly end-of-line crap. Flag "jtag_device" command as obsolete in its helptext. git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@1987 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60 --- diff --git a/src/jtag/jtag.c b/src/jtag/jtag.c index d0cb4332..fb7429f2 100644 --- a/src/jtag/jtag.c +++ b/src/jtag/jtag.c @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ * oyvind.harboe@zylin.com * * * * Copyright (C) 2009 SoftPLC Corporation * - * http://softplc.com * + * http://softplc.com * * dick@softplc.com * * * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * @@ -595,12 +595,10 @@ void jtag_add_ir_scan(int in_num_fields, scan_field_t *in_fields, tap_state_t st { if (jtag_verify&&jtag_verify_capture_ir) { - /* 8 x 32 bit id's is enough for all invoations */ + /* 8 x 32 bit id's is enough for all invocations */ for (int j = 0; j < in_num_fields; j++) { - in_fields[j].check_value=NULL; - in_fields[j].check_mask=NULL; /* if we are to run a verification of the ir scan, we need to get the input back. * We may have to allocate space if the caller didn't ask for the input back. */ @@ -716,7 +714,7 @@ int MINIDRIVER(interface_jtag_add_plain_ir_scan)(int in_num_fields, const scan_f jtag_command_t * cmd = cmd_queue_alloc(sizeof(jtag_command_t)); scan_command_t * scan = cmd_queue_alloc(sizeof(scan_command_t)); scan_field_t * out_fields = cmd_queue_alloc(in_num_fields * sizeof(scan_field_t)); - + jtag_queue_command(cmd); cmd->type = JTAG_SCAN; @@ -844,9 +842,9 @@ int MINIDRIVER(interface_jtag_add_dr_scan)(int in_num_fields, const scan_field_t jtag_command_t * cmd = cmd_queue_alloc(sizeof(jtag_command_t)); scan_command_t * scan = cmd_queue_alloc(sizeof(scan_command_t)); scan_field_t * out_fields = cmd_queue_alloc((in_num_fields + bypass_devices) * sizeof(scan_field_t)); - + jtag_queue_command(cmd); - + cmd->type = JTAG_SCAN; cmd->cmd.scan = scan; @@ -880,7 +878,7 @@ int MINIDRIVER(interface_jtag_add_dr_scan)(int in_num_fields, const scan_field_t assert(field > start_field); /* must have at least one input field per not bypassed TAP */ } - + /* if a TAP is bypassed, generated a dummy bit*/ else { @@ -2322,7 +2320,7 @@ int jtag_register_commands(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx) COMMAND_ANY, "set maximum jtag speed (if supported); " "parameter is maximum khz, or 0 for adaptive clocking (RTCK)."); register_command(cmd_ctx, NULL, "jtag_device", handle_jtag_device_command, - COMMAND_CONFIG, "jtag_device "); + COMMAND_CONFIG, "(DEPRECATED) jtag_device "); register_command(cmd_ctx, NULL, "reset_config", handle_reset_config_command, COMMAND_ANY, "[none/trst_only/srst_only/trst_and_srst] [srst_pulls_trst/trst_pulls_srst] [combined/separate] [trst_push_pull/trst_open_drain] [srst_push_pull/srst_open_drain]"); @@ -3369,7 +3367,7 @@ static const struct tms_sequences old_tms_seqs[6][6] = /* [from_state_ndx][to_ * N.B. OOCD clocks TMS from LSB first, so read these right-to-left. * N.B. These values are tightly bound to the table in tap_get_tms_path_len(). * N.B. Reset only needs to be 0b11111, but in JLink an even byte of 1's is more stable. - * These extra ones cause no TAP state problem, because we go into reset and stay in reset. + * These extra ones cause no TAP state problem, because we go into reset and stay in reset. */ @@ -3388,7 +3386,7 @@ static const struct tms_sequences old_tms_seqs[6][6] = /* [from_state_ndx][to_ static const struct tms_sequences short_tms_seqs[6][6] = /* [from_state_ndx][to_state_ndx] */ { - /* this is the table submitted by Jeff Williams on 3/30/2009 with this comment: + /* this is the table submitted by Jeff Williams on 3/30/2009 with this comment: OK, I added Peter's version of the state table, and it works OK for me on MC1322x. I've recreated the jlink portion of patch with this @@ -3443,7 +3441,7 @@ bool tap_is_state_stable(tap_state_t astate) { bool is_stable; - /* A switch() is used because it is symbol dependent + /* A switch() is used because it is symbol dependent (not value dependent like an array), and can also check bounds. */ switch( astate ) @@ -3467,7 +3465,7 @@ tap_state_t tap_state_transition(tap_state_t cur_state, bool tms) { tap_state_t new_state; - /* A switch is used because it is symbol dependent and not value dependent + /* A switch is used because it is symbol dependent and not value dependent like an array. Also it can check for out of range conditions. */