From: Wenyou Yang Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 04:55:20 +0000 (+0800) Subject: ARM: at91: gpio: fix at91_set_gpio_value() define X-Git-Tag: v2017.05-rc2~8^2~21 X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8c4e4101d68ca075bba641c88a398ee8ed81b07f;p=u-boot ARM: at91: gpio: fix at91_set_gpio_value() define When the CONFIG_ATMEL_LEGACY is undefined, according to the following defines, at91_set_gpio_value() references to at91_set_pio_value(x, y) with two parameters. #define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y) at91_set_pio_value(x, y) #define at91_get_gpio_value(x) at91_get_pio_value(x) But there isn't the implementation of at91_set_pio_value(x, y) with two parameters in U-Boot. This is an error. Same as at91_get_gpio_value(x) define. Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang Reviewed-by: Simon Glass --- diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h index 5a32bdba8d..df0f71975a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h @@ -223,15 +223,13 @@ static inline unsigned pin_to_mask(unsigned pin) at91_set_pio_output((x - PIN_BASE) / 32,(x % 32), y) #define at91_set_gpio_input(x, y) \ at91_set_pio_input((x - PIN_BASE) / 32,(x % 32), y) -#define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y) \ - at91_set_pio_value((x - PIN_BASE) / 32,(x % 32), y) -#define at91_get_gpio_value(x) \ - at91_get_pio_value((x - PIN_BASE) / 32,(x % 32)) -#else -#define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y) at91_set_pio_value(x, y) -#define at91_get_gpio_value(x) at91_get_pio_value(x) #endif +#define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y) \ + at91_set_pio_value((x / 32), (x % 32), y) +#define at91_get_gpio_value(x) \ + at91_get_pio_value((x / 32), (x % 32)) + #define GPIO_PIOA_BASE (0) #define GPIO_PIOB_BASE (GPIO_PIOA_BASE + 32) #define GPIO_PIOC_BASE (GPIO_PIOB_BASE + 32)