From: Stefan Brüns Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 02:36:49 +0000 (+0200) Subject: ext4: After completely filled group, scan next group from the beginning X-Git-Tag: v2016.11-rc1~87 X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a9fa0ed183b7e156db0c711f2aad8d573fae3498;p=u-boot ext4: After completely filled group, scan next group from the beginning The last free block of a block group may be in its middle. After it has been allocated, the next block group should be scanned from its beginning. The following command triggers the bad behaviour (on a blocksize 1024 fs): ./sandbox/u-boot -c 'i=0; host bind 0 ./disk.raw ; while test $i -lt 260 ; do echo $i; setexpr i $i + 1; ext4write host 0:2 0 /X${i} 0x1450; done ; ext4write host 0:2 0 /X240 0x2000 ; ' When 'X240' is extended from 5200 byte to 8192 byte, the new blocks should start from the first free block (8811), but it uses the blocks 8098-8103 and 16296-16297 -- 8103 + 1 + 8192 = 16296. This can be shown with debugfs, commands 'ffb' and 'stat X240'. Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski --- diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_common.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_common.c index 1661d89ca6..db5cdb9c06 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_common.c +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_common.c @@ -903,8 +903,8 @@ uint32_t ext4fs_get_new_blk_no(void) goto fail; } else { -restart: fs->curr_blkno++; +restart: /* get the blockbitmap index respective to blockno */ bg_idx = fs->curr_blkno / blk_per_grp; if (fs->blksz == 1024) { @@ -922,8 +922,9 @@ restart: if (bgd[bg_idx].free_blocks == 0) { debug("block group %u is full. Skipping\n", bg_idx); - fs->curr_blkno = fs->curr_blkno + blk_per_grp; - fs->curr_blkno--; + fs->curr_blkno = (bg_idx + 1) * blk_per_grp; + if (fs->blksz == 1024) + fs->curr_blkno += 1; goto restart; } @@ -940,6 +941,7 @@ restart: bg_idx) != 0) { debug("going for restart for the block no %ld %u\n", fs->curr_blkno, bg_idx); + fs->curr_blkno++; goto restart; }