From: Juergen Kilb <j.jilb@phytec.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:22:01 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: smc91xx_eeprom: Correct chip detection check.
X-Git-Tag: v2010.09-rc1~82^2~2^2~11
X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=aa9fba5313a8a5c088d1cfc7708ed9d206105bc2;p=u-boot

smc91xx_eeprom: Correct chip detection check.

The smc911x_detect function in /net/driver/net/smc911x.c
returns a 0 if everything was ok (a chip was found) and -1 else.
In the standalone example 'smc911x_eeprom' the return value
of smc911x_detect is interpreted in a different way
(0 for error, !0 as OK).
This leads to the error that the chip will not be detected.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Kilb <j.kilb@phytec.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>

Signed-off-by: Ben Warren <biggerbadderben@gmail.com>
---

diff --git a/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c b/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
index c51a05028a..00e826689f 100644
--- a/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
+++ b/examples/standalone/smc911x_eeprom.c
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void dump_eeprom(struct eth_device *dev)
 static int smc911x_init(struct eth_device *dev)
 {
 	/* See if there is anything there */
-	if (!smc911x_detect_chip(dev))
+	if (smc911x_detect_chip(dev))
 		return 1;
 
 	smc911x_reset(dev);