From: Simon Glass Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 20:17:31 +0000 (-0700) Subject: sandbox: Correct ordering of 'sb save' commands X-Git-Tag: v2015.04-rc1~105 X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b5493d17bdc62b0a0608d539bd2756eb7ed1cc9c;p=u-boot sandbox: Correct ordering of 'sb save' commands Prior to commit d455d87 there was an inconsistency between the position of the 'address' parameter in 'sb load' and 'sb save'. This was corrected but it broke some tests. Fix the tests and also the help for 'sb save'. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- diff --git a/common/cmd_sandbox.c b/common/cmd_sandbox.c index 3d9fce7e55..428696982e 100644 --- a/common/cmd_sandbox.c +++ b/common/cmd_sandbox.c @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ U_BOOT_CMD( "load hostfs - [ ] - " "load a file from host\n" "sb ls hostfs - - list files on host\n" - "sb save hostfs - [] - " + "sb save hostfs - [] - " "save a file to host\n" "sb bind [] - bind \"host\" device to file\n" "sb info [] - show device binding & info\n" diff --git a/test/dm/sf.c b/test/dm/sf.c index 57dd1345c4..08098a18b8 100644 --- a/test/dm/sf.c +++ b/test/dm/sf.c @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static int dm_test_spi_flash(struct dm_test_state *dms) * benefit is worth the extra complexity. */ ut_asserteq(0, run_command_list( - "sb save hostfs - spi.bin 0 200000;" + "sb save hostfs - 0 spi.bin 200000;" "sf probe;" "sf test 0 10000", -1, 0)); /* diff --git a/test/image/test-fit.py b/test/image/test-fit.py index b065fcb130..0eb424d875 100755 --- a/test/image/test-fit.py +++ b/test/image/test-fit.py @@ -97,9 +97,9 @@ sb load hostfs 0 %(fit_addr)x %(fit)s fdt addr %(fit_addr)x bootm start %(fit_addr)x bootm loados -sb save hostfs 0 %(kernel_out)s %(kernel_addr)x %(kernel_size)x -sb save hostfs 0 %(fdt_out)s %(fdt_addr)x %(fdt_size)x -sb save hostfs 0 %(ramdisk_out)s %(ramdisk_addr)x %(ramdisk_size)x +sb save hostfs 0 %(kernel_addr)x %(kernel_out)s %(kernel_size)x +sb save hostfs 0 %(fdt_addr)x %(fdt_out)s %(fdt_size)x +sb save hostfs 0 %(ramdisk_addr)x %(ramdisk_out)s %(ramdisk_size)x reset '''