From: oharboe <oharboe@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:49:21 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: added note w/reference to discussion on whether or not arm11 code is broken or not.
X-Git-Tag: v0.3.0-rc0~371
X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b747da266344ae9f17b5e27a38bbe51e28f00e7a;p=openocd

added note w/reference to discussion on whether or not arm11 code is broken or not.

git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2580 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
---

diff --git a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c
index 5b6188f5..9e8be889 100644
--- a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c
+++ b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c
@@ -479,6 +479,10 @@ int arm11_run_instr_data_to_core(arm11_common_t * arm11, uint32_t opcode, uint32
  *
  *  To disable this code, try "memwrite burst false"
  *
+ *  FIX!!! should we use multiple TAP_IDLE here or not???
+ *
+ *  https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-July/009698.html
+ *  https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-August/009865.html
  */
 tap_state_t arm11_MOVE_DRPAUSE_IDLE_DRPAUSE_with_delay[] =
 {