From: Stephen Warren Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 03:05:22 +0000 (-0600) Subject: usb: dwc2: implement interrupt transfers X-Git-Tag: v2015.07-rc1~406 X-Git-Url: https://git.sur5r.net/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e236519b7365ef75c5da6a5623f0b03d9c00cfae;p=u-boot usb: dwc2: implement interrupt transfers As best I can tell, there's no difference between bulk and interrupt transfers in terms of how the HW should be programmed, at least given that we're executing one transaction at a time rather than scheduling them into frames for maximum throughput. This patch ends up sharing the toggle bit state between bulk and interrupt transfers on a particular EP. However I believe this is fine; AFAIK a given EP either uses bulk or interrupt transfers and doesn't mix them. This patch doesn't do anything with the "interval" parameter for interrupt transfers, but then most other USB controller drivers in U-Boot don't either. It turns out that one of my keyboards is happy to work using control transfers but the other only gives non-zero "HID reports" via interrupt transfers. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren --- diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c b/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c index b1d94ccc1a..f3fbe76acf 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/dwc2.c @@ -904,9 +904,8 @@ int submit_control_msg(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned long pipe, void *buffer, int submit_int_msg(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned long pipe, void *buffer, int len, int interval) { - printf("dev = %p pipe = %#lx buf = %p size = %d int = %d\n", - dev, pipe, buffer, len, interval); - return -ENOSYS; + /* FIXME: what is interval? */ + return submit_bulk_msg(dev, pipe, buffer, len); } /* U-Boot USB control interface */