From 2953cd459f91b6eec897886aa6b3e570182d0137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Howard Chu Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:36:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Revert 1.159, seems to trigger a concurrency bug. ??? --- servers/slapd/back-bdb/back-bdb.h | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/servers/slapd/back-bdb/back-bdb.h b/servers/slapd/back-bdb/back-bdb.h index 36b821c8ae..9b9020b1d3 100644 --- a/servers/slapd/back-bdb/back-bdb.h +++ b/servers/slapd/back-bdb/back-bdb.h @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ typedef struct bdb_entry_info { * to avoid conflicting with BDB's internal locks. So add a byte here * that is always zero. */ - char bei_lockpad; + short bei_lockpad; short bei_state; #define CACHE_ENTRY_DELETED 1 @@ -151,10 +151,10 @@ typedef struct bdb_cache { EntryInfo *c_lruhead; /* lru - add accessed entries here */ EntryInfo *c_lrutail; /* lru - rem lru entries from here */ EntryInfo c_dntree; - unsigned c_maxsize; + int c_maxsize; int c_cursize; - unsigned c_minfree; - unsigned c_eimax; + int c_minfree; + int c_eimax; int c_eiused; /* EntryInfo's in use */ int c_leaves; /* EntryInfo leaf nodes */ int c_purging; @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ struct bdb_info { ID bi_lastid; ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_t bi_lastid_mutex; - unsigned bi_idl_cache_max_size; + int bi_idl_cache_max_size; int bi_idl_cache_size; Avlnode *bi_idl_tree; bdb_idl_cache_entry_t *bi_idl_lru_head; -- 2.39.5