From 587e1d43e786ad70ce52a47f74b98d785098e378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:41:50 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Fix hush to give the correct return code for a simple command When a simple command like 'false' is provided, hush should return the result of that command. However, hush only does this if the FLAG_EXIT_FROM_LOOP flag is provided. Without this flag, hush will happily execute the empty string command immediate after 'false' and then return a success code. This behaviour does not seem very useful, and requiring the flag also seems wrong, since it means that hush will execute only the first command in a sequence. Add a check for empty string and fall out of the loop in that case. That at least fixes the simple command case. This is a change in behaviour but it is unlikely that the old behaviour would be considered correct in any case. Reported-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- common/cli_hush.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/common/cli_hush.c b/common/cli_hush.c index 0f069b010a..e0c436f1a7 100644 --- a/common/cli_hush.c +++ b/common/cli_hush.c @@ -3215,7 +3215,9 @@ static int parse_stream_outer(struct in_str *inp, int flag) free_pipe_list(ctx.list_head,0); } b_free(&temp); - } while (rcode != -1 && !(flag & FLAG_EXIT_FROM_LOOP)); /* loop on syntax errors, return on EOF */ + /* loop on syntax errors, return on EOF */ + } while (rcode != -1 && !(flag & FLAG_EXIT_FROM_LOOP) && + (inp->peek != static_peek || b_peek(inp))); #ifndef __U_BOOT__ return 0; #else -- 2.39.5