From 5985dee35da3ea24f1c9cb30b6cd50aa1bc63660 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?=C3=98yvind=20Harboe?= Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:57:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm11: do not use dynamic arrays MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Allocate working memory dynamically, caught by checkstack.pl Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe --- TODO | 3 ++- src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index c7e341d9..bdbb0ecc 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -309,7 +309,8 @@ fairly easy to complete: - use dynamic allocations for working memory. Scan & fix code for excessive stack allocations. take linux/scripts/checkstack.pl and -see what the worst offenders are. Example, on amd64: +see what the worst offenders are. Dynamic stack allocations are found +at the bottom of the list below. Example, on amd64: $ objdump -d | checkstack.pl | head -10 0x004311e3 image_open [openocd]: 13464 diff --git a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c index 0f7e4953..26de4ceb 100644 --- a/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c +++ b/src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c @@ -880,10 +880,11 @@ int arm11_sc7_run(struct arm11_common * arm11, struct arm11_sc7_action * actions */ void arm11_sc7_clear_vbw(struct arm11_common * arm11) { - struct arm11_sc7_action clear_bw[arm11->brp + arm11->wrp + 1]; + size_t clear_bw_size = arm11->brp + arm11->wrp + 1; + struct arm11_sc7_action *clear_bw = malloc(sizeof(struct arm11_sc7_action) * clear_bw_size); struct arm11_sc7_action * pos = clear_bw; - for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(clear_bw); i++) + for (size_t i = 0; i < clear_bw_size; i++) { clear_bw[i].write = true; clear_bw[i].value = 0; @@ -899,7 +900,9 @@ void arm11_sc7_clear_vbw(struct arm11_common * arm11) (pos++)->address = ARM11_SC7_VCR; - arm11_sc7_run(arm11, clear_bw, ARRAY_SIZE(clear_bw)); + arm11_sc7_run(arm11, clear_bw, clear_bw_size); + + free (clear_bw); } /** Write VCR register -- 2.39.5