From 6de78c536f78bc47129a7d4da4ad10f7e3a27b8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oliver Schmidt Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:50:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Made DOS 3.3 IRQ statement more general. I recently came across that the question if a driver is compatible with DOS 3.3 isn't about the fact if it actually uses IRQs but if it potentially could use IRQs as the driver kernel pulls in the IRQ handler anyway. This is especially suboptimal in the scenario of statically linked drivers where it is concpetually totally clear at link time they use IRQs or not. Apart from that it might make sense to be able to define on a per-target basis if _any_ of the drivers of a certain class uses IRQs. If that isn't the cases the driver kernel for that driver class for that target could omit IRQ handling too. I'm aware that Uz imagined drivers being loaded which weren't known when the program was linked - but I don't see this. --- doc/apple2.sgml | 2 +- doc/apple2enh.sgml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/apple2.sgml b/doc/apple2.sgml index d0405b6de..3089a04c4 100644 --- a/doc/apple2.sgml +++ b/doc/apple2.sgml @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ BASIC.SYSTEM) there are some limitations for DOS 3.3:

diff --git a/doc/apple2enh.sgml b/doc/apple2enh.sgml index b5231b4cd..5e4626fbc 100644 --- a/doc/apple2enh.sgml +++ b/doc/apple2enh.sgml @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ BASIC.SYSTEM) there are some limitations for DOS 3.3:

-- 2.39.5