From 78248f1df67d1b4feefd8ac4e459acd7599d6af2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?=C3=98yvind=20Harboe?= Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:49:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] flash: write_image will now pad erase to nearest sector MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit this is done for unlocking and it is a simple omission that it wasn't done for sectors. The unnerving thing is that nobody has complained about this until now.... Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe --- src/flash/nor/core.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/flash/nor/core.c b/src/flash/nor/core.c index b8dda96b..1ff41937 100644 --- a/src/flash/nor/core.c +++ b/src/flash/nor/core.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /*************************************************************************** * Copyright (C) 2005 by Dominic Rath * - * Copyright (C) 2007,2008 Øyvind Harboe * + * Copyright (C) 2007-2010 Øyvind Harboe * * Copyright (C) 2008 by Spencer Oliver * * Copyright (C) 2009 Zachary T Welch * * * @@ -519,12 +519,6 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image, struct flash_bank *c; int *padding; - /* REVISIT do_pad should perhaps just be another parameter. - * GDB wouldn't ever need it, since it erases separately. - * But "flash write_image" commands might want that option. - */ - bool do_pad = false; - section = 0; section_offset = 0; @@ -694,7 +688,7 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image, { /* calculate and erase sectors */ retval = flash_erase_address_range(target, - do_pad, run_address, run_size); + true, run_address, run_size); } } -- 2.39.5