From 9752cea92cc802791c8897078315aa75119c5797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Julio=20S=C3=A1nchez=20Fern=C3=A1ndez?= Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:35:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] No code change, added a comment warning of a possible future difficulty. Apparently, we refuse to index ;binary attributes. That is mostly bogus. Whether it is indexable or not depends on whether we know how to or not, nothing more. I.e., the existance of indexer and filter functions for the matching rules that are relevant to the attribute type. --- servers/slapd/value.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/servers/slapd/value.c b/servers/slapd/value.c index 3d4e05acd6..0508b3590d 100644 --- a/servers/slapd/value.c +++ b/servers/slapd/value.c @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ value_normalize( } /* we only support equality matching of binary attributes */ + /* This is suspect, flexible certificate matching will hit this */ if( slap_ad_is_binary( ad ) && usage != SLAP_MR_EQUALITY ) { *text = "inappropriate binary matching"; return LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING; -- 2.39.5