From aa23b21baffb71b912cd8afcc1a103711677be46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kurt Zeilenga Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:00:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add comment containing possible dn attributetype specification. --- servers/slapd/schema/core.schema | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/servers/slapd/schema/core.schema b/servers/slapd/schema/core.schema index c228000e37..adc963bef7 100644 --- a/servers/slapd/schema/core.schema +++ b/servers/slapd/schema/core.schema @@ -228,7 +228,9 @@ attributetype ( 2.5.4.30 NAME 'supportedApplicationContext' # distinguished name of an entry. On the other hand, the attribute # type distinguishedName is meant to be an "abstract" type and other # dn-valued attribute types derive from it. So at most, 'dn' would -# be a subtype of distinguishedName. +# be a subtype of distinguishedName, something like: +# attributetype ( dnOID NAME 'dn' SUP distinguishedName +# SINGLE-VALUE NO-USER-MODIFICATION USAGE directoryOperation ) attributetype ( 2.5.4.49 NAME 'distinguishedName' EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch -- 2.39.5