From ca0e237d39a8e50c702cec4d825c4b44d63e4d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Fertser Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:27:45 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] arm11: initialise DPM and register cache before reading DSCR for the first time When target was already halted during the initial examination, arm11_check_init() was trying to read, store and interpret DSCR contents before the DPM structure is initialised. This caused a segfault like described on http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/openocd/ticket/65 . This is a totally untested attempt to fix this issue. Change-Id: I2fff115679a3f0023e7a88c749ccb5f045d6cf01 Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/2043 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver --- src/target/arm11.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/target/arm11.c b/src/target/arm11.c index 61f1f64e..0cb1d8c8 100644 --- a/src/target/arm11.c +++ b/src/target/arm11.c @@ -1177,6 +1177,12 @@ static int arm11_examine(struct target *target) LOG_DEBUG("IDCODE %08" PRIx32 " IMPLEMENTOR %02x DIDR %08" PRIx32, device_id, implementor, didr); + /* Build register cache "late", after target_init(), since we + * want to know if this core supports Secure Monitor mode. + */ + if (!target_was_examined(target)) + CHECK_RETVAL(arm11_dpm_init(arm11, didr)); + /* as a side-effect this reads DSCR and thus * clears the ARM11_DSCR_STICKY_PRECISE_DATA_ABORT / Sticky Precise Data Abort Flag * as suggested by the spec. @@ -1186,12 +1192,6 @@ static int arm11_examine(struct target *target) if (retval != ERROR_OK) return retval; - /* Build register cache "late", after target_init(), since we - * want to know if this core supports Secure Monitor mode. - */ - if (!target_was_examined(target)) - CHECK_RETVAL(arm11_dpm_init(arm11, didr)); - /* ETM on ARM11 still uses original scanchain 6 access mode */ if (arm11->arm.etm && !target_was_examined(target)) { *register_get_last_cache_p(&target->reg_cache) = -- 2.39.5