From f50ca7c184bf1c02ed6102cfffcc2ca7b4ef4116 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Timo Ketola Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:47:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] NAND: Misleading report of erased blocks For example, when blocks 2 and 3 were erased, openocd reported "erased blocks 2 to 4". That should be "2 to 3", I think. Change-Id: Icece63dedd3dd931b70fa73616819a19572e39de Signed-off-by: Timo Ketola Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/385 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver --- src/flash/nand/tcl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/flash/nand/tcl.c b/src/flash/nand/tcl.c index 63893779..c52c347f 100644 --- a/src/flash/nand/tcl.c +++ b/src/flash/nand/tcl.c @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ COMMAND_HANDLER(handle_nand_erase_command) { command_print(CMD_CTX, "erased blocks %lu to %lu " "on NAND flash device #%s '%s'", - offset, offset + length, + offset, offset + length - 1, CMD_ARGV[0], p->device->name); } -- 2.39.5