From fc2fbac74bb7aa66c4f3234d8484916046df5365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kurt Zeilenga Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:14:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] New I-Ds --- doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr.txt | 278 ++++++++ doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509.txt | 895 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 1173 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr.txt create mode 100644 doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509.txt diff --git a/doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr.txt b/doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..43390f0b79 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr.txt @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@ +INTERNET-DRAFT Kurt D. Zeilenga +Intended Category: Experimental OpenLDAP Foundation +Expires in six months 17 October 2004 + + + LDAP Modify-Increment Extension + + + +Status of this Memo + + This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and + revision, submitted to the RFC Editor as an Experimental document. + Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Technical discussion of this + document will take place on the IETF LDAP Extensions mailing list + . Please send editorial comments directly to the + author . + + By submitting this Internet-Draft, I accept the provisions of Section + 4 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any + applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been + disclosed, or will be disclosed, and any of which I become aware will + be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668. + + Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task + Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other + groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. + + Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months + and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any + time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material + or to cite them other than as "work in progress." + + The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at + . The list of + Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at + . + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. + + Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document + for more information. + + +Abstract + + This document describes an extension to the Lightweight Directory + Access Protocol (LDAP) Modify operation to support an increment + + + +Zeilenga LDAP Modify-Increment Extension [Page 1] + +INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr-00.txt 17 October 2004 + + + capability. This extension is useful in provisioning applications, + especially when combined with the assertion control and/or the + pre-read or post-read control extension. + + +1. Background and Intended Use + + The Lightwieght Directory Access Protocol [Roadmap] does not currently + provide an operation to increment values of an attribute. A client + must read the values of the attribute, then modify those values to + increment them by the desired amount. As the values may be updated by + other clients between this add and modify, the client must be careful + to construct the modify request so that it fails in this case, and + upon failure, re-read the values and construct a new modify request. + + This document extends the LDAP Modify Operation [Protocol] to support + an increment values capability. This feature is intended to be used + with either the LDAP pre-read or post-read control extension + [READENTRY]. This feature may be used with the LDAP assertion control + [ASSERT] to provide test-and-increment functionality. + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119]. + + +2. The Modify-Increment Extension + + This document extends the LDAP Modify request to support a increment + values capability. Implementations of this extension SHALL support an + additional ModifyRequest operation enumeration value increment (3) as + described herein. Implementations not supporting this extension will + treat this value as they would an unlisted value, e.g., as a protocol + error. + + The increment (3) operation value specifies that an increment values + modification is requested. All existing values of the modification + attribute are to be incremented by the listed value. The modification + attribute must be appropriate for request, e.g., must have INTEGER or + other incrementable values, and the modification must provide one and + only value. + + Servers supporting this feature SHOULD publish the object identifier + (OID) OID-TBD as a value of the 'supportedFeatures' [RFC3674] + attribute in the root DSE. Clients supporting this feature SHOULD NOT + use the feature unless they have knowledge the server supports it. + + + + + +Zeilenga LDAP Modify-Increment Extension [Page 2] + +INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr-00.txt 17 October 2004 + + + 3. LDIF Support + + To represent Modify-Increment requests in LDAP Data Interchange Format + [RFC2849], the ABNF [RFC2234] production is extended as + follows: + + mod-spec /= "increment:" FILL AttributeDescription SEP + attrval-spec "-" SEP + + For example, + + # Increment uidNumber + dn: cn=max-assigned uidNumber,dc=example,dc=com + changetype: modify + increment: uidNumber + uidNumber: 1 + - + + This LDIF fragment represents a Modify request to increment the + value(s) of uidNumber by 1. + + +4. Security Considerations + + General LDAP security considerations [Roadmap], as well as those + specific to the LDAP Modify [Protocol], apply to this Modify-Increment + extension. Beyond these considerations, it is noted that introduction + of this extension should reduce application complexity (by provide one + operation what presently requires multiple operation) and, hence, may + aide in the production of correct and secure implementations. + + +5. IANA Considerations + + Registration of the LDAP Protocol Mechanism [BCP64bis] defined in + document is requested. + + Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration + Object Identifier: OID-TBD + Description: Modify-Increment + Person & email address to contact for further information: + Kurt Zeilenga + Usage: Feature + Specification: RFC XXXX + Author/Change Controller: Kurt Zeilenga + Comments: none + + + + + +Zeilenga LDAP Modify-Increment Extension [Page 3] + +INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr-00.txt 17 October 2004 + + +6. Author's Address + + Kurt D. Zeilenga + OpenLDAP Foundation + + + +7. Normative References + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14 (also RFC 2119), March 1997. + + [RFC2234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax + Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997. + + [RFC2849] Good, G., "The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) - + Technical Specification", RFC 2849, June 2000. + + [Features] Zeilenga, K., "Feature Discovery in LDAP", RFC 3674, + December 2003. + + [Roadmap] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Technical Specification + Road Map", draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in + progress. + + [Protocol] Sermersheim, J. (editor), "LDAP: The Protocol", + draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-xx.txt, a work in progress. + + +8. Informative References + + [BCP64bis] Zeilenga, K., "IANA Considerations for LDAP", + draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-xx.txt, a work in progress. + + [READENTRY] Zeilenga, K., "LDAP Read Entry Controls", + draft-zeilenga-ldap-readentry-xx.txt, a work in + progress. + + [ASSERT] Zeilenga, K., "LDAP Assertion Control", + draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert-xx.txt, a work in progress. + + [ASSIGN] OpenLDAP Foundation, "OpenLDAP OID Delegations", + http://www.openldap.org/foundation/oid-delegate.txt. + + [PRIVATE] IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers", + http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers. + + + + + +Zeilenga LDAP Modify-Increment Extension [Page 4] + +INTERNET-DRAFT draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr-00.txt 17 October 2004 + + +Intellectual Property Rights + + The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any + Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to + pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in + this document or the extent to which any license under such rights + might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has + made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information + on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found + in BCP 78 and BCP 79. + + Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any + assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an + attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of + such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification + can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at + http://www.ietf.org/ipr. + + The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any + copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary + rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement + this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at + ietf-ipr@ietf.org. + + + +Full Copyright + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject + to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and + except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. + + This document and the information contained herein are provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS + OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET + ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, + INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE + INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED + WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + + + + + + + + + + + + +Zeilenga LDAP Modify-Increment Extension [Page 5] + + diff --git a/doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509.txt b/doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8256c684ac --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/drafts/draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509.txt @@ -0,0 +1,895 @@ + +INTERNET-DRAFT Kurt D. Zeilenga +Intended Category: Standard Track OpenLDAP Foundation +Expires in six months 17 October 2004 +Obsoletes: RFC 2252, RFC 2256 + + + LDAP X.509 Certificate Schema + + + +Status of this Memo + + This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and + revision, submitted to the RFC Editor as an Standard Track document. + Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Technical discussion of this + document will take place on the IETF LDAP Extensions mailing list + . Please send editorial comments directly to the + author . + + This document is intended to be published in conjunction to the + revised LDAP TS [Roadmap] when, in conjunction with this document, + obsoletes RFC 2252 and RFC 2256 in their entirety. + + By submitting this Internet-Draft, I accept the provisions of Section + 4 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any + applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been + disclosed, or will be disclosed, and any of which I become aware will + be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668. + + Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task + Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other + groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. + + Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months + and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any + time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material + or to cite them other than as "work in progress." + + The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at + . The list of + Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at + . + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. + + Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document + for more information. + + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 1] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + +Abstract + + This document describes schema for representing X.509 certificates, + X.521 security information, and related elements in directories + accessible using the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). + The LDAP definitions for these X.509 and X.521 schema elements + replaces those provided in RFC 2252 and RFC 2256. + + +1. Background and Intended Use + + This document provides LDAP schema definitions for a subset of + elements specified in X.509 [X.509] and X.521 [X.521], including + attribute types for certificates, cross certificate pairs, and + certificate revocation lists; matching rules to be used with these + attribute types; and related object classes. LDAP syntax definitions + are also provided for associated assertion and attribute values. + + As the semantics of these elements are as defined in X.509 and X.521, + knowledge of X.509 and X.521 is necessary to make use of the LDAP + schema definitions provided herein. + + This document, together with [Roadmap], obsoletes RFC 2252 and RFC + 2256 in their entirety. The changes made since RFC 2252 and RFC 2256 + include: + - addition of pkiUser, pkiCA, and deltaCRL classes; + - updated of attribute types to include equality matching rules in + accordance with their X.500 specifications; + - addition of certificate, certificate pair, certificate list, and + algorithm identifer matching rules; and + - addition of LDAP syntax for assertion syntaxes for these matching + rules. + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this + document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119]. + + Schema definitions are provided using LDAP description formats + [Models]. Definitions provided here are formatted (line wrapped) for + readability. + + +2. Syntaxes + + This section describes various syntaxes used to transfer certificates + and related data types in LDAP. + + + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 2] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + +2.1. Certificate + + ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.8 DESC 'X.509 Certificate' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 Certificate [Section 7, X.509]. + + Due to changes made to the ASN.1 definition of a Certificate made + through time, no LDAP-specific encoding is defined for this syntax. + Values of this syntax are to encoded using DER [X.690] and MUST only + be transferred using the ;binary transfer option [Binary]. That is, + by requesting and returning values using attribute descriptions such + as "userCertificate;binary". + + As values of this syntax contain digitally-signed data, values of this + syntax, and the form of the value, MUST be preserved as presented. + + +2.2. CertificateList + + ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.9 DESC 'X.509 Certificate List' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateList [Section 7.3, + X.509]. + + Due to changes made to the ASN.1 definition of a CertificateList made + through time, no LDAP-specific encoding is defined for this syntax. + Values of this syntax are to encoded using DER [X.690] and MUST only + be transferred using the ;binary transfer option [Binary]. That is, + by requesting and returning values using attribute descriptions such + as "certificateRevocationList;binary". + + As values of this syntax contain digitally-signed data, values of this + syntax, and the form of the value, MUST be preserved as presented. + + +2.3. CertificatePair + + ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.10 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificatePair [Section 11.2.3, + X.509]. + + Due to changes made to the ASN.1 definition of an X.509 + CertificatePair made through time, no LDAP-specific encoding is + defined for this syntax. Values of this syntax are to encoded using + DER [X.690] and MUST only be transferred using the ;binary transfer + option [Binary]. That is, by requesting and returning values using + attribute descriptions such as "crossCertificatePair;binary". + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 3] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + As values of this syntax contain digitally-signed data, values of this + syntax, and the form of the value, MUST be preserved as presented. + +2.4 SupportedAlgorithm + + ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.49 + DESC 'X.508 Supported Algorithm' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 SupportedAlgorithm [Section 11.2.7, + X.509]. + + Due to changes made to the ASN.1 definition of an X.509 + SupportedAlgorithm made through time, no LDAP-specific encoding is + defined for this syntax. Values of this syntax are to encoded using + DER [X.690] and MUST only be transferred using the ;binary transfer + option [Binary]. That is, by requesting and returning values using + attribute descriptions such as "supportedAlgorithms;binary". + + As values of this syntax contain digitally-signed data, values of this + syntax, and the form of the value, MUST be preserved as presented. + + +2.5. CertificateExactAssertion + + ( IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.1 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Exact Assertion' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateExactAssertion [Section + 11.3.1, X.509]. + + The LDAP-specific encoding used for this syntax is described by the + following ABNF [RFC2234]: + + certificateExactAssertion = serialNumber DOLLAR issuer + serialNumber = number + issuer = distinguishedName + + where and are as given in [Models] and + is as given in [LDAPDN]. + + Example: 10$cn=Example$CA,dc=example,dc=com + + Note: DOLLAR ('$') characters may appear in the production. + + +2.6. CertificateAssertion + + ( IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.2 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Assertion' ) + + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 4] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateAssertion [Section + 11.3.2, X.509]. + + Values of this syntax are to be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. + Appendix A.1 provides an equivalent ABNF grammar for this syntax. + + +2.7. CertificatePairExactAssertion + + ( IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.3 + DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair Exact Assertion' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificatePairExactAssertion + [Section 11.3.3, X.509]. + + Values of this syntax are to be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. + Appendix A.2 provides an equivalent ABNF grammar for this syntax. + + +2.8. CertificatePairAssertion + + ( IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.4 DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair Assertion' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificatePairAssertion [Section + 11.3.4, X.509]. + + Values of this syntax are to be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. + Appendix A.3 provides an equivalent ABNF grammar for this syntax. + + +2.9. CertificateListExactAssertion + + ( IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.5 + DESC 'X.509 Certificate List Exact Assertion' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateListExactAssertion + [Section 11.3.5, X.509]. + + Values of this syntax are to be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. + Appendix A.4 provides an equivalent ABNF grammar for this syntax. + + +2.10. CertificateListAssertion + + ( IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.6 DESC 'X.509 Certificate List Assertion' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 CertificateListAssertion [Section + 11.3.6, X.509]. + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 5] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + Values of this syntax are to be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. + Appendix A.5 provides an equivalent ABNF grammar for this syntax. + + +2.11 AlgorithmIdentifier + + ( IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.7 DESC 'X.509 Algorithm Identifier' ) + + A value of this syntax is an X.509 AlgorithmIdentifier [Section 7, + X.509]. + + Values of this syntax are to be encoded using GSER [RFC3641]. + Appendix A.6 provides an equivalent ABNF grammar for this syntax. + + +3. Matching Rules + + This section introduces a set of certificate and related matching + rules for use in LDAP. These rules are intended to act in accordance + with their X.500 counterparts. + + +3.1. certificateExactMatch + + The certificateExactMatch matching rule compares the presented + certificate exact assertion value with an attribute value of the + certificate syntax as described in Section 11.3.1 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.13.34 NAME 'certificateExactMatch' + DESC 'X.509 Certificate Exact Match' + SYNTAX IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.1 ) + + +3.2. certificateMatch + + The certificateMatch matching rule compares the presented certificate + assertion value with an attribute value of the certificate syntax as + described in Section 11.3.2 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.13.35 NAME 'certificateMatch' + DESC 'X.509 Certificate Match' + SYNTAX IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.2 ) + + +3.3. certificatePairExactMatch + + The certificatePairExactMatch matching rule compares the presented + certificate pair exact assertion value with an attribute value of the + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 6] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + certificate pair syntax as described in Section 11.3.3 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.13.36 NAME 'certificatePairExactMatch' + DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair Exact Match' + SYNTAX IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.3 ) + + +3.4. certificatePairMatch + + The certificatePairMatch matching rule compares the presented + certificate pair assertion value with an attribute value of the + certificate pair syntax as described in Section 11.3.4 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.13.37 NAME 'certificatePairMatch' + DESC 'X.509 Certificate Pair Match' + SYNTAX IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.4 ) + + +3.5. certificateListExactMatch + + The certificateListExactMatch matching rule compares the presented + certificate list exact assertion value with an attribute value of the + certificate pair syntax as described in Section 11.3.5 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.13.38 NAME 'certificateListExactMatch' + DESC 'X.509 Certificate List Exact Match' + SYNTAX IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.5 ) + + +3.6. certificateListMatch + + The certificateListMatch matching rule compares the presented + certificate list assertion value with an attribute value of the + certificate pair syntax as described in Section 11.3.6 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.13.39 NAME 'certificateListMatch' + DESC 'X.509 Certificate List Match' + SYNTAX IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.6 ) + + +3.7. algorithmIdentifierMatch + + The algorithmIdentifierMatch mating rule compares a presented + algorithm identifier with an attribute value of supported algorithm as + described in Section 11.3.7 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.13.40 NAME 'algorithmIdentifier' + DESC 'X.509 Algorithm Identifier Match' + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 7] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + SYNTAX IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.7 ) + + +4. Attribute Types + + This section details a set of certificate and related attribute types + for use in LDAP. + + +4.1. userCertificate + + The userCertificate attribute holds the X.509 certificates issued to + the user by one or more certificate authorities, as discussed in + Section 11.2.1 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.4.36 NAME 'userCertificate' + DESC 'X.509 user certificate' + EQUALITY certificateExactMatch + SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.8 ) + + As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute + are requested and transferred using the attribute description + "userCertificate;binary". + + +4.2. cACertificate + + The cACertificate attribute holds the X.509 certificates issued to the + certificate authority (CA), as discussed in Section 11.2.2 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.4.37 NAME 'cACertificate' + DESC 'X.509 CA certificate' + EQUALITY certificateExactMatch + SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.8 ) + + As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute + are requested and transferred using the attribute description + "cACertificate;binary". + + +4.3. crossCertificatePair + + The crossCertificatePair attribute holds an X.509 certificate pair, as + discussed in Section 11.2.3 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.4.40 NAME 'crossCertificatePair' + DESC 'X.509 cross certificate pair' + EQUALITY certificatePairExactMatch + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 8] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.10 ) + + As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute + are requested and transferred using the attribute description + "crossCertificatePair;binary". + + +4.4. certificateRevocationList + + The certificateRevocationList attribute holds certificate lists, as + discussed in 11.2.4 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.4.39 NAME 'certificateRevocationList' + DESC 'X.509 certificate revocation list' + EQUALITY certificateListExactMatch + SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.9 ) + + As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute + are requested and transferred using the attribute description + "certificateRevocationList;binary". + + +4.5. authorityRevocationList + + The authorityRevocationList attribute holds certificate lists, as + discussed in 11.2.5 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.4.38 NAME 'authorityRevocationList' + DESC 'X.509 authority revocation list' + EQUALITY certificateListExactMatch + SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.9 ) + + As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute + are requested and transferred using the attribute description + "authorityRevocationList;binary". + + +4.6. deltaRevocationList + + The deltaRevocationList attribute holds certificate lists, as + discussed in 11.2.6 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.4.53 NAME 'deltaRevocationList' + DESC 'X.509 delta revocation list' + EQUALITY certificateListExactMatch + SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.9 ) + + As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 9] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + MUST be requested and transferred using the attribute description + "deltaRevocationList;binary". + + +4.7. supportedAlgorithms + + The supportedAlgorithms attribute holds supported algorithms, as + discussed in 11.2.7 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.4.52 NAME 'supportedAlgorithms' + DESC 'X.509 supported algorithms' + EQUALITY algorithmIdentifierMatch + SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.49 ) + + As required by this attribute type's syntax, values of this attribute + MUST be requested and transferred using the attribute description + "supportedAlgorithms;binary". + + +5. Object Classes + + This section details a set of certificate-related object classes for + use in LDAP. + + +5.1. pkiUser + + This object class is used in augment entries for objects that may be + subject to certificates, as defined in Section 11.1.1 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.6.21 NAME 'pkiUser' + DESC 'X.509 PKI User' + SUP top AUXILIARY + MAY userCertificate ) + + +5.2. pkiCA + + This object class is used to augment entries for objects which act as + certificate authorities, as defined in Section 11.1.2 of [X.509] + + ( 2.5.6.22 NAME 'pkiCA' + DESC 'X.509 PKI Certificate Authority' + SUP top AUXILIARY + MAY ( cACertificate $ certificateRevocationList $ + authorityRevocationList $ crossCertificatePair ) ) + + + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 10] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + +5.3. cRLDistributionPoint + + This class is used to represent objects which act as CRL distribution + points, as discussed in Section 11.1.3 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.6.19 NAME 'cRLDistributionPoint' + DESC 'X.509 CRL distribution point' + SUP top STRUCTURAL + MUST cn + MAY ( certificateRevocationList $ + authorityRevocationList $ deltaRevocationList ) ) + + +5.4 deltaCRL + + The deltaCRL object class is used to augment entries no hold delta + revocation lists, as discussed in Section 11.1.4 of [X.509]. + + ( 2.5.6.23 NAME 'deltaCRL' + DESC 'X.509 delta CRL' + SUP top AUXILIARY + MAY deltaRevocationList ) + + +5.5. strongAuthenticationUser + + This object class is used to augment entries for objects participating + in certificate-based authentication, as defined in Section 6.15 of + [X.521]. This object class is deprecated in favor of pkiUser. + + ( 2.5.6.15 NAME 'strongAuthenticationUser' + DESC 'X.521 strong authentication user' + SUP top AUXILIARY + MUST userCertificate ) + + +5.6. userSecurityInformation + + This object class is used to augment entries with needed additional + associated security information, as defined in Section 6.16 of + [X.521]. + + ( 2.5.6.18 NAME 'userSecurityInformation' + DESC 'X.521 user security information' + SUP top AUXILIARY + MAY ( supportedAlgorithms ) ) + + + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 11] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + +5.7. certificationAuthority + + This object class is used to augment entries for objects which act as + certificate authorities, as defined in Section 6.17 of [X.521]. This + object class is deprecated in favor of pkiCA. + + ( 2.5.6.16 NAME 'certificationAuthority' + DESC 'X.509 certificate authority' + SUP top AUXILIARY + MUST ( authorityRevocationList $ + certificateRevocationList $ cACertificate ) + MAY crossCertificatePair ) + + +5.8. certificationAuthority-V2 + + This object class is used to augment entries for objects which act as + certificate authorities, as defined in Section 6.18 of [X.521]. This + object class is deprecated in favor of pkiCA. + + ( 2.5.6.16.2 NAME 'certificationAuthority-V2' + DESC 'X.509 certificate authority, version 2' + SUP certificationAuthority AUXILIARY + MAY deltaRevocationList ) + + +6. Security Considerations + + The directory administrator is to use the server's access control + facilities to restrict access as desired. + + General LDAP security considerations [Roadmap] apply. + + +7. IANA Considerations + +7.1. Object Identifier Registration + + It is requested that IANA register upon Standards Action an LDAP + Object Identifier for use in this technical specification. + + Subject: Request for LDAP OID Registration + Person & email address to contact for further information: + Kurt Zeilenga + Specification: RFC XXXX + Author/Change Controller: IESG + Comments: + Identifies the LDAP X.509 Certificate schema elements + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 12] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + +7.2. Registration of the descriptor + + It is requested that IANA update upon Standards Action the LDAP + Descriptor registry as indicated below. + + Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration + Descriptor (short name): see table + Object Identifier: see table + Person & email address to contact for further information: + Kurt Zeilenga + Usage: see table + Specification: RFC XXXX + Author/Change Controller: IESG + + algorithmIdentifierMatch R 2.5.13.40 + authorityRevocationList A 2.5.4.38 * + cACertificate A 2.5.4.37 * + cRLDistributionPoint O 2.5.6.19 * + certificateExactMatch R 2.5.13.34 + certificateListExactMatch R 2.5.13.38 + certificateListMatch R 2.5.13.39 + certificateMatch R 2.5.13.35 + certificatePairExactMatch R 2.5.13.36 + certificatePairMatch R 2.5.13.37 + certificateRevocationList A 2.5.4.39 * + certificationAuthority O 2.5.6.16 * + certificationAuthority-V2 O 2.5.6.16.2 * + crossCertificatePair A 2.5.4.40 * + deltaCRL O 2.5.6.23 + deltaRevocationList A 2.5.4.53 * + pkiCA O 2.5.6.22 + pkiUser O 2.5.6.21 + strongAuthenticationUser O 2.5.6.15 * + supportedAlgorithms A 2.5.4.52 * + userCertificate A 2.5.4.36 * + userSecurityInformation O 2.5.6.18 * + + * Updates previous registration + + +8. Acknowledgments + + This document is based upon X.509, a product of the ITU-T. A number + of LDAP schema definitions were based on those found RFC 2252 and RFC + 2256, both products of the IETF ASID WG. + + Additional material was borrowed from prior works by David Chadwick + and/or Steven Legg to refine LDAP X.509 Schema. + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 13] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + +9. Author's Address + + Kurt D. Zeilenga + OpenLDAP Foundation + + Email: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org + + +10. Normative References + + [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate + Requirement Levels", BCP 14 (also RFC 2119), March 1997. + + [RFC2234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax + Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997. + + [RFC3641] Legg, S., "Generic String Encoding Rules for ASN.1 + Types", RFC 3641, October 2003. + + [Roadmap] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Technical Specification + Road Map", draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in + progress. + + [Models] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Directory Information + Models", draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-xx.txt, a work in + progress. + + [Binary] Legg, S., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): + The Binary Encoding Option", + draft-legg-ldap-binary-xx.txt, a work in progress. + + [X.509] International Telecommunication Union - + Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The + Directory: Authentication Framework", X.509(2000). + + [X.521] International Telecommunication Union - + Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The + Directory: Selected Object Classes", X.521(2000). + + [X.680] International Telecommunication Union - + Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Abstract + Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) - Specification of Basic + Notation", X.680(1997) (also ISO/IEC 8824-1:1998). + + [X.690] International Telecommunication Union - + Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "Specification + of ASN.1 encoding rules: Basic Encoding Rules (BER), + Canonical Encoding Rules (CER), and Distinguished + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 14] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + Encoding Rules (DER)", X.690(1997) (also ISO/IEC + 8825-1:1998). + + +11. Informative References + + [RFC3383] Zeilenga, K., "IANA Considerations for LDAP", BCP 64 + (also RFC 3383), September 2002. + + [RFC3642] Legg, S., "Common Elements of GSER Encodings", RFC 3642, + October 2003. + + [BCP64bis] Zeilenga, K., "IANA Considerations for LDAP", + draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-xx.txt, a work in progress. + + +Appendix A. + + This appendix is informative. + + This appendix, once written, will provide ABNF [RFC2234] grammars for + GSER-based LDAP-specific encodings specified in this document. These + grammars where produced using, and rely on, Common Elements for GSER + Encodings [RFC3342]. + + + +Intellectual Property Rights + + The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any + Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to + pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in + this document or the extent to which any license under such rights + might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has + made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information + on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found + in BCP 78 and BCP 79. + + Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any + assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an + attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of + such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification + can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at + http://www.ietf.org/ipr. + + The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any + copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary + rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 15] + +INTERNET-DRAFT LDAP X.509 Schema 17 October 2004 + + + this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at + ietf-ipr@ietf.org. + + + +Full Copyright + + Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject + to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and + except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. + + This document and the information contained herein are provided on an + "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS + OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET + ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, + INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE + INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED + WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-x509-00 [Page 16] + + -- 2.39.5