The P5 header was not present on "Model B" any board prior to Revision 2.0,
there's no need for a separate device tree.
Also, it looks like "rev2" is incorrectly used to only cover the 512MiB
memory models; there also were 256MiB 2.0 boards.
I don't have all of the boards to check this, I'm following this table:
http://elinux.org/RPi_HardwareHistory#Board_Revision_History
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_old_scheme[] = {
[0x2] = {
- "Model B (no P5)",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b-i2c0.dtb",
+ "Model B",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
true,
},
[0x3] = {
- "Model B (no P5)",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b-i2c0.dtb",
+ "Model B",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
true,
},
[0x4] = {
- "Model B",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
+ "Model B rev2",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb",
true,
},
[0x5] = {
- "Model B",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
+ "Model B rev2",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb",
true,
},
[0x6] = {
- "Model B",
- "bcm2835-rpi-b.dtb",
+ "Model B rev2",
+ "bcm2835-rpi-b-rev2.dtb",
true,
},
[0x7] = {