Projects:
Bacula Projects Roadmap
- 08 November 2005
+ 07 December 2005
+ (prioritized by user vote)
+
+Summary:
+Item 1: Implement data encryption (as opposed to comm encryption)
+Item 2: Implement Migration that moves Jobs from one Pool to another.
+Item 3: Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted files from
+Item 4: Implement a Bacula GUI/management tool using Python.
+Item 5: Implement Base jobs.
+Item 6: Allow FD to initiate a backup
+Item 7: Improve Bacula's tape and drive usage and cleaning management.
+Item 8: Implement creation and maintenance of copy pools
+Item 9: Implement new {Client}Run{Before|After}Job feature.
+Item 10: Merge multiple backups (Synthetic Backup or Consolidation).
+Item 11: Deletion of Disk-Based Bacula Volumes
+Item 12: Directive/mode to backup only file changes, not entire file
+Item 13: Multiple threads in file daemon for the same job
+Item 14: Implement red/black binary tree routines.
+Item 15: Add support for FileSets in user directories CACHEDIR.TAG
+Item 16: Implement extraction of Win32 BackupWrite data.
+Item 17: Implement a Python interface to the Bacula catalog.
+Item 18: Archival (removal) of User Files to Tape
+Item 19: Add Plug-ins to the FileSet Include statements.
+Item 20: Implement more Python events in Bacula.
+Item 21: Quick release of FD-SD connection after backup.
+Item 22: Permit multiple Media Types in an Autochanger
+Item 23: Allow different autochanger definitions for one autochanger.
+Item 24: Automatic disabling of devices
+Item 25: Implement huge exclude list support using hashing.
+
Below, you will find more information on future projects:
-Item 1: Implement a Migration job type that will move the job
- data from one device to another.
- Origin: Sponsored by Riege Sofware International GmbH. Contact:
+Item 1: Implement data encryption (as opposed to comm encryption)
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Sponsored by Landon and 13 contributors to EFF.
+ Status: Landon Fuller is currently implementing this.
+
+ What: Currently the data that is stored on the Volume is not
+ encrypted. For confidentiality, encryption of data at
+ the File daemon level is essential.
+ Data encryption encrypts the data in the File daemon and
+ decrypts the data in the File daemon during a restore.
+
+ Why: Large sites require this.
+
+Item 2: Implement Migration that moves Jobs from one Pool to another.
+ Origin: Sponsored by Riege Software International GmbH. Contact:
Daniel Holtkamp <holtkamp at riege dot com>
Date: 28 October 2005
Status: Partially coded in 1.37 -- much more to do. Assigned to
freed up for current backups while maintaining older
data on tape drives.
- Notes: Migration could be triggered by:
+ Notes: Riege Software have asked for the following migration
+ triggers:
+ Age of Job
+ Highwater mark (stopped by Lowwater mark?)
+
+ Notes: Migration could be additionally triggered by:
Number of Jobs
Number of Volumes
- Age of Jobs
- Highwater size (keep total size)
- Lowwater mark
-Item 2: Implement extraction of Win32 BackupWrite data.
- Origin: Thorsten Engel <thorsten.engel at matrix-computer dot com>
- Date: 28 October 2005
- Status: Assigned to Thorsten. Implemented in current CVS
+Item 3: Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted files from
+ Incremental/Differential backups
+ Date: 28 November 2005
+ Origin: Martin Simmons (martin at lispworks dot com)
+ Status:
- What: This provides the Bacula File daemon with code that
- can pick apart the stream output that Microsoft writes
- for BackupWrite data, and thus the data can be read
- and restored on non-Win32 machines.
+ What: When restoring a fileset for a specified date (including "most
+ recent"), Bacula should give you exactly the files and directories
+ that existed at the time of the last backup prior to that date.
- Why: BackupWrite data is the portable=no option in Win32
- FileSets, and in previous Baculas, this data could
- only be extracted using a Win32 FD. With this new code,
- the Windows data can be extracted and restored on
- any OS.
+ Currently this only works if the last backup was a Full backup.
+ When the last backup was Incremental/Differential, files and
+ directories that have been renamed or deleted since the last Full
+ backup are not currently restored correctly. Ditto for files with
+ extra/fewer hard links than at the time of the last Full backup.
+
+ Why: Incremental/Differential would be much more useful if this worked.
+ Notes: Item 14 (Merging of multiple backups into a single one) seems to
+ rely on this working, otherwise the merged backups will not be
+ truly equivalent to a Full backup.
-Item 3: Implement a Bacula GUI/management tool using Python
- and Qt.
+ Kern: notes shortened. This can be done without the need for
+ inodes. It is essentially the same as the current Verify job,
+ but one additional database record must be written, which does
+ not need any database change.
+ Kern: see if we can correct restoration of directories if
+ replace=ifnewer is set. Currently, if the directory does not
+ exist, a "dummy" directory is created, then when all the files
+ are updated, the dummy directory is newer so the real values
+ are not updated.
+
+Item 4: Implement a Bacula GUI/management tool using Python.
Origin: Kern
Date: 28 October 2005
Status:
What: Implement a Bacula console, and management tools
- using Python and Qt.
+ using Python and Qt or GTK.
Why: Don't we already have a wxWidgets GUI? Yes, but
it is written in C++ and changes to the user interface
Python, which will give many more users easy (or easier)
access to making additions or modifications.
-Item 4: Implement a Python interface to the Bacula catalog.
- Date: 28 October 2005
- Origin: Kern
- Status:
+ Notes: This is currently being implemented using Python-GTK by
+ Lucas Di Pentima <lucas at lunix dot com dot ar>
- What: Implement an interface for Python scripts to access
- the catalog through Bacula.
-
- Why: This will permit users to customize Bacula through
- Python scripts.
-
-Item 5: Implement more Python events in Bacula.
- Date: 28 October 2005
- Origin:
- Status:
-
- What: Allow Python scripts to be called at more places
- within Bacula and provide additional access to Bacula
- internal variables.
-
- Why: This will permit users to customize Bacula through
- Python scripts.
-
- Notes: Recycle event
- Scratch pool event
- NeedVolume event
-
-
-Item 6: Implement Base jobs.
+Item 5: Implement Base jobs.
Date: 28 October 2005
Origin: Kern
Status:
pulled in where necessary.
Why: This is something none of the competition does, as far as
- we know (except perhpas BackupPC, which is a Perl program that
+ we know (except perhaps BackupPC, which is a Perl program that
saves to disk only). It is big win for the user, it
makes Bacula stand out as offering a unique
optimization that immediately saves time and money.
FD a list of files/attribs, and the FD must search the
list and compare it for each file to be saved.
-Item 7: Add Plug-ins to the FileSet Include statements.
- Date: 28 October 2005
- Origin:
- Status: Partially coded in 1.37 -- much more to do.
-
- What: Allow users to specify wild-card and/or regular
- expressions to be matched in both the Include and
- Exclude directives in a FileSet. At the same time,
- allow users to define plug-ins to be called (based on
- regular expression/wild-card matching).
-
- Why: This would give the users the ultimate ability to control
- how files are backed up/restored. A user could write a
- plug-in knows how to backup his Oracle database without
- stopping/starting it, for example.
-
-Item 8: Implement huge exclude list support using hashing.
- Date: 28 October 2005
- Origin: Kern
- Status:
-
- What: Allow users to specify very large exclude list (currently
- more than about 1000 files is too many).
-
- Why: This would give the users the ability to exclude all
- files that are loaded with the OS (e.g. using rpms
- or debs). If the user can restore the base OS from
- CDs, there is no need to backup all those files. A
- complete restore would be to restore the base OS, then
- do a Bacula restore. By excluding the base OS files, the
- backup set will be *much* smaller.
-
-
-Item 9: Implement data encryption (as opposed to communications
- encryption)
- Date: 28 October 2005
- Origin: Sponsored by Landon and 13 contributors to EFF.
- Status: Landon Fuller is currently implementing this.
-
- What: Currently the data that is stored on the Volume is not
- encrypted. For confidentiality, encryption of data at
- the File daemon level is essential.
- Data encryption encrypts the data in the File daemon and
- decrypts the data in the File daemon during a restore.
-
- Why: Large sites require this.
-
-Item 10: Permit multiple Media Types in an Autochanger
- Origin:
- Status:
-
- What: Modify the Storage daemon so that multiple Media Types
- can be specified in an autochanger. This would be somewhat
- of a simplistic implementation in that each drive would
- still be allowed to have only one Media Type. However,
- the Storage daemon will ensure that only a drive with
- the Media Type that matches what the Director specifies
- is chosen.
-
- Why: This will permit user with several different drive types
- to make full use of their autochangers.
-
-Item 11: Allow two different autochanger definitions that refer
- to the same autochanger.
- Date: 28 October 2005
- Origin: Kern
- Status:
-
- What: Currently, the autochanger script is locked based on
- the autochanger. That is, if multiple drives are being
- simultaneously used, the Storage daemon ensures that only
- one drive at a time can access the mtx-changer script.
- This change would base the locking on the control device,
- rather than the autochanger. It would then permit two autochanger
- definitions for the same autochanger, but with different
- drives. Logically, the autochanger could then be "partitioned"
- for different jobs, clients, or class of jobs, and if the locking
- is based on the control device (e.g. /dev/sg0) the mtx-changer
- script will be locked appropriately.
-
- Why: This will permit users to partition autochangers for specific
- use. It would also permit implementation of multiple Media
- Types with no changes to the Storage daemon.
+Item 6: Allow FD to initiate a backup
+ Origin: Frank Volf (frank at deze dot org)
+ Date: 17 November 2005
+ Status:
-Item 12: Implement red/black binary tree routines.
- Date: 28 October 2005
- Origin: Kern
- Status:
+ What: Provide some means, possibly by a restricted console that
+ allows a FD to initiate a backup, and that uses the connection
+ established by the FD to the Director for the backup so that
+ a Director that is firewalled can do the backup.
- What: Implement a red/black binary tree class. This could
- then replace the current binary insert/search routines
- used in the restore in memory tree. This could significantly
- speed up the creation of the in memory restore tree.
-
- Why: Performance enhancement.
+ Why: Makes backup of laptops much easier.
-Item 13: Let Bacula log tape usage and handle drive cleaning cycles.
- Date: November 11, 2005
- Origin: Arno Lehmann <al at its-lehmann dot de>
+Item 7: Improve Bacula's tape and drive usage and cleaning management.
+ Date: 8 November 2005, November 11, 2005
+ Origin: Adam Thornton <athornton at sinenomine dot net>,
+ Arno Lehmann <al at its-lehmann dot de>
Status:
- What: Make Bacula manage tape life cycle information and drive
- cleaning cycles.
+ What: Make Bacula manage tape life cycle information, tape reuse
+ times and drive cleaning cycles.
- Why: Both parts of this project are important when operating backups.
+ Why: All three parts of this project are important when operating
+ backups.
We need to know which tapes need replacement, and we need to
make sure the drives are cleaned when necessary. While many
tape libraries and even autoloaders can handle all this
automatically, support by Bacula can be helpful for smaller
- (older) libraries and single drives. Also, checking drive
- status during operation can prevent some failures (as I had to
- learn the hard way...)
+ (older) libraries and single drives. Limiting the number of
+ times a tape is used might prevent tape errors when using
+ tapes until the drives can't read it any more. Also, checking
+ drive status during operation can prevent some failures (as I
+ [Arno] had to learn the hard way...)
Notes: First, Bacula could (and even does, to some limited extent)
record tape and drive usage. For tapes, the number of mounts,
the amount of data, and the time the tape has actually been
- running could be recorded. Data fields for Read and Write time
- and Nmber of mounts already exist in the catalog (I'm not sure
- if VolBytes is the sum of all bytes ever written to that volume
- by Bacula). This information can be important when determining
- which media to replace. For the tape drives known to Bacula,
- similar information is interesting to determine the device
- status and expected life time: Time it's been Reading and
- Writing, number of tape Loads / Unloads / Errors. This
- information is not yet recorded as far as I know.
-
- The next step would be implementing drive cleaning setup.
- Bacula already has knowledge about cleaning tapes. Once it has
- some information about cleaning cycles (measured in drive run
- time, number of tapes used, or calender days, for example) it
- can automatically execute tape cleaning (with an autochanger,
- obviously) or ask for operator assistence loading a cleaning
- tape.
-
- The next step would be to implement TAPEALERT checks not only
- when changing tapes and only sending he information to the
+ running could be recorded. Data fields for Read and Write
+ time and Number of mounts already exist in the catalog (I'm
+ not sure if VolBytes is the sum of all bytes ever written to
+ that volume by Bacula). This information can be important
+ when determining which media to replace. The ability to mark
+ Volumes as "used up" after a given number of write cycles
+ should also be implemented so that a tape is never actually
+ worn out. For the tape drives known to Bacula, similar
+ information is interesting to determine the device status and
+ expected life time: Time it's been Reading and Writing, number
+ of tape Loads / Unloads / Errors. This information is not yet
+ recorded as far as I [Arno] know. A new volume status would
+ be necessary for the new state, like "Used up" or "Worn out".
+ Volumes with this state could be used for restores, but not
+ for writing. These volumes should be migrated first (assuming
+ migration is implemented) and, once they are no longer needed,
+ could be moved to a Trash pool.
+
+ The next step would be to implement a drive cleaning setup.
+ Bacula already has knowledge about cleaning tapes. Once it
+ has some information about cleaning cycles (measured in drive
+ run time, number of tapes used, or calender days, for example)
+ it can automatically execute tape cleaning (with an
+ autochanger, obviously) or ask for operator assistance loading
+ a cleaning tape.
+
+ The final step would be to implement TAPEALERT checks not only
+ when changing tapes and only sending the information to the
administrator, but rather checking after each tape error,
- checking on a regular basis (for example after each tape file),
- and also before unloading and after loading a new tape. Then,
- depending on the drives TAPEALERT state and the know drive
- cleaning state Bacula could automatically schedule later
+ checking on a regular basis (for example after each tape
+ file), and also before unloading and after loading a new tape.
+ Then, depending on the drives TAPEALERT state and the known
+ drive cleaning state Bacula could automatically schedule later
cleaning, clean immediately, or inform the operator.
Implementing this would perhaps require another catalog change
- and perhaps major changes in SD code and the DIR-SD protocoll,
+ and perhaps major changes in SD code and the DIR-SD protocol,
so I'd only consider this worth implementing if it would
- actually be used or even needed by many people.
+ actually be used or even needed by many people.
+
+ Implementation of these projects could happen in three distinct
+ sub-projects: Measuring Tape and Drive usage, retiring
+ volumes, and handling drive cleaning and TAPEALERTs.
-Item 14: Merging of multiple backups into a single one. (Also called Synthetic
- Backup or Consolidation).
+Item 8: Implement creation and maintenance of copy pools
+ Date: 27 November 2005
+ Origin: David Boyes (dboyes at sinenomine dot net)
+ Status:
+
+ What: I would like Bacula to have the capability to write copies
+ of backed-up data on multiple physical volumes selected
+ from different pools without transferring the data
+ multiple times, and to accept any of the copy volumes
+ as valid for restore.
+
+ Why: In many cases, businesses are required to keep offsite
+ copies of backup volumes, or just wish for simple
+ protection against a human operator dropping a storage
+ volume and damaging it. The ability to generate multiple
+ volumes in the course of a single backup job allows
+ customers to simple check out one copy and send it
+ offsite, marking it as out of changer or otherwise
+ unavailable. Currently, the library and magazine
+ management capability in Bacula does not make this process
+ simple.
+
+ Restores would use the copy of the data on the first
+ available volume, in order of copy pool chain definition.
+
+ This is also a major scalability issue -- as the number of
+ clients increases beyond several thousand, and the volume
+ of data increases, transferring the data multiple times to
+ produce additional copies of the backups will become
+ physically impossible due to transfer speed
+ issues. Generating multiple copies at server side will
+ become the only practical option.
+
+ How: I suspect that this will require adding a multiplexing
+ SD that appears to be a SD to a specific FD, but 1-n FDs
+ to the specific back end SDs managing the primary and copy
+ pools. Storage pools will also need to acquire parameters
+ to define the pools to be used for copies.
+
+ Notes: I would commit some of my developers' time if we can agree
+ on the design and behavior.
+
+Item 9: Implement new {Client}Run{Before|After}Job feature.
+ Date: 26 September 2005
+ Origin: Phil Stracchino <phil.stracchino at speakeasy dot net>
+ Status:
+ What: Some time ago, there was a discussion of RunAfterJob and
+ ClientRunAfterJob, and the fact that they do not run after failed
+ jobs. At the time, there was a suggestion to add a
+ RunAfterFailedJob directive (and, presumably, a matching
+ ClientRunAfterFailedJob directive), but to my knowledge these
+ were never implemented.
+
+ An alternate way of approaching the problem has just occurred to
+ me. Suppose the RunBeforeJob and RunAfterJob directives were
+ expanded in a manner something like this example:
+
+ RunBeforeJob {
+ Command = "/opt/bacula/etc/checkhost %c"
+ RunsOnClient = No
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All # All, Full, Diff, Inc
+ AbortJobOnError = Yes
+ }
+ RunBeforeJob {
+ Command = c:/bacula/systemstate.bat
+ RunsOnClient = yes
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All # All, Full, Diff, Inc
+ AbortJobOnError = No
+ }
+
+ RunAfterJob {
+ Command = c:/bacula/deletestatefile.bat
+ RunsOnClient = Yes
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All # All, Full, Diff, Inc
+ RunsOnSuccess = Yes
+ RunsOnFailure = Yes
+ }
+ RunAfterJob {
+ Command = c:/bacula/somethingelse.bat
+ RunsOnClient = Yes
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All
+ RunsOnSuccess = No
+ RunsOnFailure = Yes
+ }
+ RunAfterJob {
+ Command = "/opt/bacula/etc/checkhost -v %c"
+ RunsOnClient = No
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All
+ RunsOnSuccess = No
+ RunsOnFailure = Yes
+ }
+
+
+ Why: It would be a significant change to the structure of the
+ directives, but allows for a lot more flexibility, including
+ RunAfter commands that will run regardless of whether the job
+ succeeds, or RunBefore tasks that still allow the job to run even
+ if that specific RunBefore fails.
+
+ Notes: By Kern: I would prefer to have a single new Resource called
+ RunScript. More notes from Phil:
+
+ RunBeforeJob = yes|no
+ RunAfterJob = yes|no
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All|Full|Diff|Inc
+
+ The AbortJobOnError, RunsOnSuccess and RunsOnFailure directives
+ could be optional, and possibly RunsWhen as well.
+
+ AbortJobOnError would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to Before
+ (or RunsBefore Job set to Yes), and would default to Yes if
+ omitted. If AbortJobOnError was set to No, failure of the script
+ would still generate a warning.
+
+ RunsOnSuccess would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to After
+ (or RunsBeforeJob set to No), and default to Yes.
+
+ RunsOnFailure would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to After,
+ and default to No.
+
+ Allow having the before/after status on the script command
+ line so that the same script can be used both before/after.
+ David Boyes.
+
+Item 10: Merge multiple backups (Synthetic Backup or Consolidation).
Origin: Marc Cousin and Eric Bollengier
Date: 15 November 2005
Status: Depends on first implementing project Item 1 (Migration).
It would be a Merge of existing backups into a single backup.
In effect, it is like a restore but to the backup medium.
- For instance, say that last sunday we made a full backup. Then
+ For instance, say that last Sunday we made a full backup. Then
all week long, we created incremental backups, in order to do
- them fast. Now comes sunday again, and we need another full.
+ them fast. Now comes Sunday again, and we need another full.
The merged backup makes it possible to do instead an incremental
backup (during the night for instance), and then create a merged
backup during the day, by using the full and incrementals from
the week. The merged backup will be exactly like a full made
- sunday night on the tape, but the production interruption on the
+ Sunday night on the tape, but the production interruption on the
Client will be minimal, as the Client will only have to send
incrementals.
data can then be pruned (or not) from the catalog, possibly
allowing older volumes to be recycled
-Item 15: Automatic disabling of devices
- Date: 2005-11-11
- Origin: Peter Eriksson <peter at ifm.liu dot se>
- Status:
+Item 11: Deletion of Disk-Based Bacula Volumes
+ Date: Nov 25, 2005
+ Origin: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan at stanfordalumni dot org> (edited
+ by Kern)
+ Status:
- What: After a configurable amount of fatal errors with a tape drive
- Bacula should automatically disable further use of a certain
- tape drive. There should also be "disable"/"enable" commands in
- the "bconsole" tool.
+ What: Provide a way for Bacula to automatically remove Volumes
+ from the filesystem, or optionally to truncate them.
+ Obviously, the Volume must be pruned prior removal.
- Why: On a multi-drive jukebox there is a possibility of tape drives
- going bad during large backups (needing a cleaning tape run,
- tapes getting stuck). It would be advantageous if Bacula would
- automatically disable further use of a problematic tape drive
- after a configurable amount of errors has occured.
+ Why: This would allow users more control over their Volumes and
+ prevent disk based volumes from consuming too much space.
- An example: I have a multi-drive jukebox (6 drives, 380+ slots)
- where tapes occasionally get stuck inside the drive. Bacula will
- notice that the "mtx-changer" command will fail and then fail
- any backup jobs trying to use that drive. However, it will still
- keep on trying to run new jobs using that drive and fail -
- forever, and thus failing lots and lots of jobs... Since we have
- many drives Bacula could have just automatically disabled
- further use of that drive and used one of the other ones
- instead.
+ Notes: The following two directives might do the trick:
+ Volume Data Retention = <time period>
+ Remove Volume After = <time period>
-Item 16: Directive/mode to backup only file changes, not entire file
+ The migration project should also remove a Volume that is
+ migrated. This might also work for tape Volumes.
+
+Item 12: Directive/mode to backup only file changes, not entire file
Date: 11 November 2005
Origin: Joshua Kugler <joshua dot kugler at uaf dot edu>
Marek Bajon <mbajon at bimsplus dot com dot pl>
Notes: This would require the usage of disk-based volumes as comparing
files would not be feasible using a tape drive.
-Item 17: Quick release of FD-SD connection
+Item 13: Multiple threads in file daemon for the same job
+ Date: 27 November 2005
+ Origin: Ove Risberg (Ove.Risberg at octocode dot com)
+ Status:
+
+ What: I want the file daemon to start multiple threads for a backup
+ job so the fastest possible backup can be made.
+
+ The file daemon could parse the FileSet information and start
+ one thread for each File entry located on a separate
+ filesystem.
+
+ A configuration option in the job section should be used to
+ enable or disable this feature. The configuration option could
+ specify the maximum number of threads in the file daemon.
+
+ If the theads could spool the data to separate spool files
+ the restore process will not be much slower.
+
+ Why: Multiple concurrent backups of a large fileserver with many
+ disks and controllers will be much faster.
+
+ Notes: I am willing to try to implement this but I will probably
+ need some help and advice. (No problem -- Kern)
+
+Item 14: Implement red/black binary tree routines.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
+
+ What: Implement a red/black binary tree class. This could
+ then replace the current binary insert/search routines
+ used in the restore in memory tree. This could significantly
+ speed up the creation of the in memory restore tree.
+
+ Why: Performance enhancement.
+
+Item 15: Add support for FileSets in user directories CACHEDIR.TAG
+ Origin: Norbert Kiesel <nkiesel at tbdnetworks dot com>
+ Date: 21 November 2005
+ Status:
+
+ What: CACHDIR.TAG is a proposal for identifying directories which
+ should be ignored for archiving/backup. It works by ignoring
+ directory trees which have a file named CACHEDIR.TAG with a
+ specific content. See
+ http://www.brynosaurus.com/cachedir/spec.html
+ for details.
+
+ From Peter Eriksson:
+ I suggest that if this is implemented (I've also asked for this
+ feature some year ago) that it is made compatible with Legato
+ Networkers ".nsr" files where you can specify a lot of options on
+ how to handle files/directories (including denying further
+ parsing of .nsr files lower down into the directory trees). A
+ PDF version of the .nsr man page can be viewed at:
+
+ http://www.ifm.liu.se/~peter/nsr.pdf
+
+ Why: It's a nice alternative to "exclude" patterns for directories
+ which don't have regular pathnames. Also, it allows users to
+ control backup for themselves. Implementation should be pretty
+ simple. GNU tar >= 1.14 or so supports it, too.
+
+ Notes: I envision this as an optional feature to a fileset
+ specification.
+
+
+Item 16: Implement extraction of Win32 BackupWrite data.
+ Origin: Thorsten Engel <thorsten.engel at matrix-computer dot com>
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Status: Assigned to Thorsten. Implemented in current CVS
+
+ What: This provides the Bacula File daemon with code that
+ can pick apart the stream output that Microsoft writes
+ for BackupWrite data, and thus the data can be read
+ and restored on non-Win32 machines.
+
+ Why: BackupWrite data is the portable=no option in Win32
+ FileSets, and in previous Baculas, this data could
+ only be extracted using a Win32 FD. With this new code,
+ the Windows data can be extracted and restored on
+ any OS.
+
+
+Item 18: Implement a Python interface to the Bacula catalog.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
+
+ What: Implement an interface for Python scripts to access
+ the catalog through Bacula.
+
+ Why: This will permit users to customize Bacula through
+ Python scripts.
+
+Item 18: Archival (removal) of User Files to Tape
+
+ Date: Nov. 24/2005
+
+ Origin: Ray Pengelly [ray at biomed dot queensu dot ca
+ Status:
+
+ What: The ability to archive data to storage based on certain parameters
+ such as age, size, or location. Once the data has been written to
+ storage and logged it is then pruned from the originating
+ filesystem. Note! We are talking about user's files and not
+ Bacula Volumes.
+
+ Why: This would allow fully automatic storage management which becomes
+ useful for large datastores. It would also allow for auto-staging
+ from one media type to another.
+
+ Example 1) Medical imaging needs to store large amounts of data.
+ They decide to keep data on their servers for 6 months and then put
+ it away for long term storage. The server then finds all files
+ older than 6 months writes them to tape. The files are then removed
+ from the server.
+
+ Example 2) All data that hasn't been accessed in 2 months could be
+ moved from high-cost, fibre-channel disk storage to a low-cost
+ large-capacity SATA disk storage pool which doesn't have as quick of
+ access time. Then after another 6 months (or possibly as one
+ storage pool gets full) data is migrated to Tape.
+
+Item 19: Add Plug-ins to the FileSet Include statements.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin:
+ Status: Partially coded in 1.37 -- much more to do.
+
+ What: Allow users to specify wild-card and/or regular
+ expressions to be matched in both the Include and
+ Exclude directives in a FileSet. At the same time,
+ allow users to define plug-ins to be called (based on
+ regular expression/wild-card matching).
+
+ Why: This would give the users the ultimate ability to control
+ how files are backed up/restored. A user could write a
+ plug-in knows how to backup his Oracle database without
+ stopping/starting it, for example.
+
+Item 20: Implement more Python events in Bacula.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin:
+ Status:
+
+ What: Allow Python scripts to be called at more places
+ within Bacula and provide additional access to Bacula
+ internal variables.
+
+ Why: This will permit users to customize Bacula through
+ Python scripts.
+
+ Notes: Recycle event
+ Scratch pool event
+ NeedVolume event
+ MediaFull event
+
+ Also add a way to get a listing of currently running
+ jobs (possibly also scheduled jobs).
+
+
+Item 21: Quick release of FD-SD connection after backup.
Origin: Frank Volf (frank at deze dot org)
- Date: 17 november 2005
+ Date: 17 November 2005
Status:
- What: In the bacula implementation a backup is finished after all data
- and attributes are succesfully written to storage. When using a
+ What: In the Bacula implementation a backup is finished after all data
+ and attributes are successfully written to storage. When using a
tape backup it is very annoying that a backup can take a day,
simply because the current tape (or whatever) is full and the
administrator has not put a new one in. During that time the
session between the storage daemon and the file daemon on the
client.
- Although this is a very good strategey for making "safe backups"
+ Although this is a very good strategy for making "safe backups"
This can be annoying for e.g. laptops, that must remain
- connected until the bacukp is completed.
+ connected until the backup is completed.
Using a new feature called "migration" it will be possible to
spool first to harddisk (using a special 'spool' migration
Storage daemon should release the File daemon as soon as all the
file data and all the attributes have been sent to it (the SD).
Currently the SD waits until everything is on tape and all the
- attributes are transmitted to the Director before signalling
+ attributes are transmitted to the Director before signaling
completion to the FD. I don't think I would have any problem
changing this. The reason is that even if the FD reports back to
the Dir that all is OK, the job will not terminate until the SD
Why: Makes backup of laptops much easier.
+Item 22: Permit multiple Media Types in an Autochanger
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status: Now implemented
+
+ What: Modify the Storage daemon so that multiple Media Types
+ can be specified in an autochanger. This would be somewhat
+ of a simplistic implementation in that each drive would
+ still be allowed to have only one Media Type. However,
+ the Storage daemon will ensure that only a drive with
+ the Media Type that matches what the Director specifies
+ is chosen.
+
+ Why: This will permit user with several different drive types
+ to make full use of their autochangers.
+
+Item 23: Allow different autochanger definitions for one autochanger.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
+
+ What: Currently, the autochanger script is locked based on
+ the autochanger. That is, if multiple drives are being
+ simultaneously used, the Storage daemon ensures that only
+ one drive at a time can access the mtx-changer script.
+ This change would base the locking on the control device,
+ rather than the autochanger. It would then permit two autochanger
+ definitions for the same autochanger, but with different
+ drives. Logically, the autochanger could then be "partitioned"
+ for different jobs, clients, or class of jobs, and if the locking
+ is based on the control device (e.g. /dev/sg0) the mtx-changer
+ script will be locked appropriately.
+
+ Why: This will permit users to partition autochangers for specific
+ use. It would also permit implementation of multiple Media
+ Types with no changes to the Storage daemon.
+
+Item 24: Automatic disabling of devices
+ Date: 2005-11-11
+ Origin: Peter Eriksson <peter at ifm.liu dot se>
+ Status:
+
+ What: After a configurable amount of fatal errors with a tape drive
+ Bacula should automatically disable further use of a certain
+ tape drive. There should also be "disable"/"enable" commands in
+ the "bconsole" tool.
+
+ Why: On a multi-drive jukebox there is a possibility of tape drives
+ going bad during large backups (needing a cleaning tape run,
+ tapes getting stuck). It would be advantageous if Bacula would
+ automatically disable further use of a problematic tape drive
+ after a configurable amount of errors has occurred.
+
+ An example: I have a multi-drive jukebox (6 drives, 380+ slots)
+ where tapes occasionally get stuck inside the drive. Bacula will
+ notice that the "mtx-changer" command will fail and then fail
+ any backup jobs trying to use that drive. However, it will still
+ keep on trying to run new jobs using that drive and fail -
+ forever, and thus failing lots and lots of jobs... Since we have
+ many drives Bacula could have just automatically disabled
+ further use of that drive and used one of the other ones
+ instead.
-============= Empty RFC form ===========
+Item 25: Implement huge exclude list support using hashing.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
+
+ What: Allow users to specify very large exclude list (currently
+ more than about 1000 files is too many).
+
+ Why: This would give the users the ability to exclude all
+ files that are loaded with the OS (e.g. using rpms
+ or debs). If the user can restore the base OS from
+ CDs, there is no need to backup all those files. A
+ complete restore would be to restore the base OS, then
+ do a Bacula restore. By excluding the base OS files, the
+ backup set will be *much* smaller.
+
+===============================================
+Not in Dec 2005 Vote:
+Item n: Allow skipping execution of Jobs
+ Date: 29 November 2005
+ Origin: Florian Schnabel <florian.schnabel at docufy dot de>
+ Status:
+
+ What: An easy option to skip a certain job on a certain date.
+ Why: You could then easily skip tape backups on holidays. Especially
+ if you got no autochanger and can only fit one backup on a tape
+ that would be really handy, other jobs could proceed normally
+ and you won't get errors that way.
+
+============= Empty Feature Request form ===========
Item n: One line summary ...
Date: Date submitted
Origin: Name and email of originator.
Why: Why it is important ...
Notes: Additional notes or features (omit if not used)
-============== End RFC form ==============
-
-
-Items completed for release 1.38.0 -- see kernsdone
+============== End Feature Request form ==============
projects / bacula / bacula / blobdiff