Projects:
Bacula Projects Roadmap
- 24 October 2004
+ 07 December 2005
+ (prioritized by user vote)
+
+Summary:
+Item 1: Implement data encryption (as opposed to comm encryption)
+Item 2: Implement Migration that moves Jobs from one Pool to another.
+Item 3: Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted files from
+Item 4: Implement a Bacula GUI/management tool using Python.
+Item 5: Implement Base jobs.
+Item 6: Allow FD to initiate a backup
+Item 7: Improve Bacula's tape and drive usage and cleaning management.
+Item 8: Implement creation and maintenance of copy pools
+Item 9: Implement new {Client}Run{Before|After}Job feature.
+Item 10: Merge multiple backups (Synthetic Backup or Consolidation).
+Item 11: Deletion of Disk-Based Bacula Volumes
+Item 12: Directive/mode to backup only file changes, not entire file
+Item 13: Multiple threads in file daemon for the same job
+Item 14: Implement red/black binary tree routines.
+Item 15: Add support for FileSets in user directories CACHEDIR.TAG
+Item 16: Implement extraction of Win32 BackupWrite data.
+Item 17: Implement a Python interface to the Bacula catalog.
+Item 18: Archival (removal) of User Files to Tape
+Item 19: Add Plug-ins to the FileSet Include statements.
+Item 20: Implement more Python events in Bacula.
+Item 21: Quick release of FD-SD connection after backup.
+Item 22: Permit multiple Media Types in an Autochanger
+Item 23: Allow different autochanger definitions for one autochanger.
+Item 24: Automatic disabling of devices
+Item 25: Implement huge exclude list support using hashing.
+
+
+Below, you will find more information on future projects:
+
+Item 1: Implement data encryption (as opposed to comm encryption)
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Sponsored by Landon and 13 contributors to EFF.
+ Status: Landon Fuller is currently implementing this.
+
+ What: Currently the data that is stored on the Volume is not
+ encrypted. For confidentiality, encryption of data at
+ the File daemon level is essential.
+ Data encryption encrypts the data in the File daemon and
+ decrypts the data in the File daemon during a restore.
+
+ Why: Large sites require this.
+
+Item 2: Implement Migration that moves Jobs from one Pool to another.
+ Origin: Sponsored by Riege Software International GmbH. Contact:
+ Daniel Holtkamp <holtkamp at riege dot com>
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Status: Partially coded in 1.37 -- much more to do. Assigned to
+ Kern.
+
+ What: The ability to copy, move, or archive data that is on a
+ device to another device is very important.
-Item 1: Implement Base jobs.
+ Why: An ISP might want to backup to disk, but after 30 days
+ migrate the data to tape backup and delete it from
+ disk. Bacula should be able to handle this
+ automatically. It needs to know what was put where,
+ and when, and what to migrate -- it is a bit like
+ retention periods. Doing so would allow space to be
+ freed up for current backups while maintaining older
+ data on tape drives.
+ Notes: Riege Software have asked for the following migration
+ triggers:
+ Age of Job
+ Highwater mark (stopped by Lowwater mark?)
+
+ Notes: Migration could be additionally triggered by:
+ Number of Jobs
+ Number of Volumes
+
+Item 3: Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted files from
+ Incremental/Differential backups
+ Date: 28 November 2005
+ Origin: Martin Simmons (martin at lispworks dot com)
+ Status:
+
+ What: When restoring a fileset for a specified date (including "most
+ recent"), Bacula should give you exactly the files and directories
+ that existed at the time of the last backup prior to that date.
+
+ Currently this only works if the last backup was a Full backup.
+ When the last backup was Incremental/Differential, files and
+ directories that have been renamed or deleted since the last Full
+ backup are not currently restored correctly. Ditto for files with
+ extra/fewer hard links than at the time of the last Full backup.
+
+ Why: Incremental/Differential would be much more useful if this worked.
+
+ Notes: Item 14 (Merging of multiple backups into a single one) seems to
+ rely on this working, otherwise the merged backups will not be
+ truly equivalent to a Full backup.
+
+ Kern: notes shortened. This can be done without the need for
+ inodes. It is essentially the same as the current Verify job,
+ but one additional database record must be written, which does
+ not need any database change.
+
+ Kern: see if we can correct restoration of directories if
+ replace=ifnewer is set. Currently, if the directory does not
+ exist, a "dummy" directory is created, then when all the files
+ are updated, the dummy directory is newer so the real values
+ are not updated.
+
+Item 4: Implement a Bacula GUI/management tool using Python.
+ Origin: Kern
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Status:
+
+ What: Implement a Bacula console, and management tools
+ using Python and Qt or GTK.
+
+ Why: Don't we already have a wxWidgets GUI? Yes, but
+ it is written in C++ and changes to the user interface
+ must be hand tailored using C++ code. By developing
+ the user interface using Qt designer, the interface
+ can be very easily updated and most of the new Python
+ code will be automatically created. The user interface
+ changes become very simple, and only the new features
+ must be implement. In addition, the code will be in
+ Python, which will give many more users easy (or easier)
+ access to making additions or modifications.
+
+ Notes: This is currently being implemented using Python-GTK by
+ Lucas Di Pentima <lucas at lunix dot com dot ar>
+
+Item 5: Implement Base jobs.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
+
What: A base job is sort of like a Full save except that you
will want the FileSet to contain only files that are
unlikely to change in the future (i.e. a snapshot of
pulled in where necessary.
Why: This is something none of the competition does, as far as
- we know (except BackupPC, which is a Perl program that
+ we know (except perhaps BackupPC, which is a Perl program that
saves to disk only). It is big win for the user, it
makes Bacula stand out as offering a unique
optimization that immediately saves time and money.
FD a list of files/attribs, and the FD must search the
list and compare it for each file to be saved.
-Item 2: Add Plug-ins to the FileSet Include statements.
+Item 6: Allow FD to initiate a backup
+ Origin: Frank Volf (frank at deze dot org)
+ Date: 17 November 2005
+ Status:
+
+ What: Provide some means, possibly by a restricted console that
+ allows a FD to initiate a backup, and that uses the connection
+ established by the FD to the Director for the backup so that
+ a Director that is firewalled can do the backup.
+
+ Why: Makes backup of laptops much easier.
+
+Item 7: Improve Bacula's tape and drive usage and cleaning management.
+ Date: 8 November 2005, November 11, 2005
+ Origin: Adam Thornton <athornton at sinenomine dot net>,
+ Arno Lehmann <al at its-lehmann dot de>
+ Status:
+
+ What: Make Bacula manage tape life cycle information, tape reuse
+ times and drive cleaning cycles.
+
+ Why: All three parts of this project are important when operating
+ backups.
+ We need to know which tapes need replacement, and we need to
+ make sure the drives are cleaned when necessary. While many
+ tape libraries and even autoloaders can handle all this
+ automatically, support by Bacula can be helpful for smaller
+ (older) libraries and single drives. Limiting the number of
+ times a tape is used might prevent tape errors when using
+ tapes until the drives can't read it any more. Also, checking
+ drive status during operation can prevent some failures (as I
+ [Arno] had to learn the hard way...)
+
+ Notes: First, Bacula could (and even does, to some limited extent)
+ record tape and drive usage. For tapes, the number of mounts,
+ the amount of data, and the time the tape has actually been
+ running could be recorded. Data fields for Read and Write
+ time and Number of mounts already exist in the catalog (I'm
+ not sure if VolBytes is the sum of all bytes ever written to
+ that volume by Bacula). This information can be important
+ when determining which media to replace. The ability to mark
+ Volumes as "used up" after a given number of write cycles
+ should also be implemented so that a tape is never actually
+ worn out. For the tape drives known to Bacula, similar
+ information is interesting to determine the device status and
+ expected life time: Time it's been Reading and Writing, number
+ of tape Loads / Unloads / Errors. This information is not yet
+ recorded as far as I [Arno] know. A new volume status would
+ be necessary for the new state, like "Used up" or "Worn out".
+ Volumes with this state could be used for restores, but not
+ for writing. These volumes should be migrated first (assuming
+ migration is implemented) and, once they are no longer needed,
+ could be moved to a Trash pool.
+
+ The next step would be to implement a drive cleaning setup.
+ Bacula already has knowledge about cleaning tapes. Once it
+ has some information about cleaning cycles (measured in drive
+ run time, number of tapes used, or calender days, for example)
+ it can automatically execute tape cleaning (with an
+ autochanger, obviously) or ask for operator assistance loading
+ a cleaning tape.
+
+ The final step would be to implement TAPEALERT checks not only
+ when changing tapes and only sending the information to the
+ administrator, but rather checking after each tape error,
+ checking on a regular basis (for example after each tape
+ file), and also before unloading and after loading a new tape.
+ Then, depending on the drives TAPEALERT state and the known
+ drive cleaning state Bacula could automatically schedule later
+ cleaning, clean immediately, or inform the operator.
+
+ Implementing this would perhaps require another catalog change
+ and perhaps major changes in SD code and the DIR-SD protocol,
+ so I'd only consider this worth implementing if it would
+ actually be used or even needed by many people.
+
+ Implementation of these projects could happen in three distinct
+ sub-projects: Measuring Tape and Drive usage, retiring
+ volumes, and handling drive cleaning and TAPEALERTs.
+
+Item 8: Implement creation and maintenance of copy pools
+ Date: 27 November 2005
+ Origin: David Boyes (dboyes at sinenomine dot net)
+ Status:
+
+ What: I would like Bacula to have the capability to write copies
+ of backed-up data on multiple physical volumes selected
+ from different pools without transferring the data
+ multiple times, and to accept any of the copy volumes
+ as valid for restore.
+
+ Why: In many cases, businesses are required to keep offsite
+ copies of backup volumes, or just wish for simple
+ protection against a human operator dropping a storage
+ volume and damaging it. The ability to generate multiple
+ volumes in the course of a single backup job allows
+ customers to simple check out one copy and send it
+ offsite, marking it as out of changer or otherwise
+ unavailable. Currently, the library and magazine
+ management capability in Bacula does not make this process
+ simple.
+
+ Restores would use the copy of the data on the first
+ available volume, in order of copy pool chain definition.
+
+ This is also a major scalability issue -- as the number of
+ clients increases beyond several thousand, and the volume
+ of data increases, transferring the data multiple times to
+ produce additional copies of the backups will become
+ physically impossible due to transfer speed
+ issues. Generating multiple copies at server side will
+ become the only practical option.
+
+ How: I suspect that this will require adding a multiplexing
+ SD that appears to be a SD to a specific FD, but 1-n FDs
+ to the specific back end SDs managing the primary and copy
+ pools. Storage pools will also need to acquire parameters
+ to define the pools to be used for copies.
+
+ Notes: I would commit some of my developers' time if we can agree
+ on the design and behavior.
+
+Item 9: Implement new {Client}Run{Before|After}Job feature.
+ Date: 26 September 2005
+ Origin: Phil Stracchino <phil.stracchino at speakeasy dot net>
+ Status:
+
+ What: Some time ago, there was a discussion of RunAfterJob and
+ ClientRunAfterJob, and the fact that they do not run after failed
+ jobs. At the time, there was a suggestion to add a
+ RunAfterFailedJob directive (and, presumably, a matching
+ ClientRunAfterFailedJob directive), but to my knowledge these
+ were never implemented.
+
+ An alternate way of approaching the problem has just occurred to
+ me. Suppose the RunBeforeJob and RunAfterJob directives were
+ expanded in a manner something like this example:
+
+ RunBeforeJob {
+ Command = "/opt/bacula/etc/checkhost %c"
+ RunsOnClient = No
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All # All, Full, Diff, Inc
+ AbortJobOnError = Yes
+ }
+ RunBeforeJob {
+ Command = c:/bacula/systemstate.bat
+ RunsOnClient = yes
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All # All, Full, Diff, Inc
+ AbortJobOnError = No
+ }
+
+ RunAfterJob {
+ Command = c:/bacula/deletestatefile.bat
+ RunsOnClient = Yes
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All # All, Full, Diff, Inc
+ RunsOnSuccess = Yes
+ RunsOnFailure = Yes
+ }
+ RunAfterJob {
+ Command = c:/bacula/somethingelse.bat
+ RunsOnClient = Yes
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All
+ RunsOnSuccess = No
+ RunsOnFailure = Yes
+ }
+ RunAfterJob {
+ Command = "/opt/bacula/etc/checkhost -v %c"
+ RunsOnClient = No
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All
+ RunsOnSuccess = No
+ RunsOnFailure = Yes
+ }
+
+
+ Why: It would be a significant change to the structure of the
+ directives, but allows for a lot more flexibility, including
+ RunAfter commands that will run regardless of whether the job
+ succeeds, or RunBefore tasks that still allow the job to run even
+ if that specific RunBefore fails.
+
+ Notes: By Kern: I would prefer to have a single new Resource called
+ RunScript. More notes from Phil:
+
+ RunBeforeJob = yes|no
+ RunAfterJob = yes|no
+ RunsAtJobLevels = All|Full|Diff|Inc
+
+ The AbortJobOnError, RunsOnSuccess and RunsOnFailure directives
+ could be optional, and possibly RunsWhen as well.
+
+ AbortJobOnError would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to Before
+ (or RunsBefore Job set to Yes), and would default to Yes if
+ omitted. If AbortJobOnError was set to No, failure of the script
+ would still generate a warning.
+
+ RunsOnSuccess would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to After
+ (or RunsBeforeJob set to No), and default to Yes.
+
+ RunsOnFailure would be ignored unless RunsWhen was set to After,
+ and default to No.
+
+ Allow having the before/after status on the script command
+ line so that the same script can be used both before/after.
+ David Boyes.
+
+Item 10: Merge multiple backups (Synthetic Backup or Consolidation).
+ Origin: Marc Cousin and Eric Bollengier
+ Date: 15 November 2005
+ Status: Depends on first implementing project Item 1 (Migration).
+
+ What: A merged backup is a backup made without connecting to the Client.
+ It would be a Merge of existing backups into a single backup.
+ In effect, it is like a restore but to the backup medium.
+
+ For instance, say that last Sunday we made a full backup. Then
+ all week long, we created incremental backups, in order to do
+ them fast. Now comes Sunday again, and we need another full.
+ The merged backup makes it possible to do instead an incremental
+ backup (during the night for instance), and then create a merged
+ backup during the day, by using the full and incrementals from
+ the week. The merged backup will be exactly like a full made
+ Sunday night on the tape, but the production interruption on the
+ Client will be minimal, as the Client will only have to send
+ incrementals.
+
+ In fact, if it's done correctly, you could merge all the
+ Incrementals into single Incremental, or all the Incrementals
+ and the last Differential into a new Differential, or the Full,
+ last differential and all the Incrementals into a new Full
+ backup. And there is no need to involve the Client.
+
+ Why: The benefit is that :
+ - the Client just does an incremental ;
+ - the merged backup on tape is just as a single full backup,
+ and can be restored very fast.
+
+ This is also a way of reducing the backup data since the old
+ data can then be pruned (or not) from the catalog, possibly
+ allowing older volumes to be recycled
+
+Item 11: Deletion of Disk-Based Bacula Volumes
+ Date: Nov 25, 2005
+ Origin: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan at stanfordalumni dot org> (edited
+ by Kern)
+ Status:
+
+ What: Provide a way for Bacula to automatically remove Volumes
+ from the filesystem, or optionally to truncate them.
+ Obviously, the Volume must be pruned prior removal.
+
+ Why: This would allow users more control over their Volumes and
+ prevent disk based volumes from consuming too much space.
+
+ Notes: The following two directives might do the trick:
+
+ Volume Data Retention = <time period>
+ Remove Volume After = <time period>
+
+ The migration project should also remove a Volume that is
+ migrated. This might also work for tape Volumes.
+
+Item 12: Directive/mode to backup only file changes, not entire file
+ Date: 11 November 2005
+ Origin: Joshua Kugler <joshua dot kugler at uaf dot edu>
+ Marek Bajon <mbajon at bimsplus dot com dot pl>
+ Status: RFC
+
+ What: Currently when a file changes, the entire file will be backed up in
+ the next incremental or full backup. To save space on the tapes
+ it would be nice to have a mode whereby only the changes to the
+ file would be backed up when it is changed.
+
+ Why: This would save lots of space when backing up large files such as
+ logs, mbox files, Outlook PST files and the like.
+
+ Notes: This would require the usage of disk-based volumes as comparing
+ files would not be feasible using a tape drive.
- What: Allow users to specify wild-card and/or regular
- expressions to be matched in both the Include and
- Exclude directives in a FileSet. At the same time,
- allow users to define plug-ins to be called (based on
- regular expression/wild-card matching).
+Item 13: Multiple threads in file daemon for the same job
+ Date: 27 November 2005
+ Origin: Ove Risberg (Ove.Risberg at octocode dot com)
+ Status:
- Why: This would give the users the ultimate ability to control
- how files are backed up/restored. A user could write a
- plug-in knows how to backup his Oracle database without
- stopping/starting it, for example.
+ What: I want the file daemon to start multiple threads for a backup
+ job so the fastest possible backup can be made.
+
+ The file daemon could parse the FileSet information and start
+ one thread for each File entry located on a separate
+ filesystem.
+
+ A configuration option in the job section should be used to
+ enable or disable this feature. The configuration option could
+ specify the maximum number of threads in the file daemon.
+
+ If the theads could spool the data to separate spool files
+ the restore process will not be much slower.
+
+ Why: Multiple concurrent backups of a large fileserver with many
+ disks and controllers will be much faster.
+
+ Notes: I am willing to try to implement this but I will probably
+ need some help and advice. (No problem -- Kern)
+
+Item 14: Implement red/black binary tree routines.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
+
+ What: Implement a red/black binary tree class. This could
+ then replace the current binary insert/search routines
+ used in the restore in memory tree. This could significantly
+ speed up the creation of the in memory restore tree.
+
+ Why: Performance enhancement.
+
+Item 15: Add support for FileSets in user directories CACHEDIR.TAG
+ Origin: Norbert Kiesel <nkiesel at tbdnetworks dot com>
+ Date: 21 November 2005
+ Status:
+
+ What: CACHDIR.TAG is a proposal for identifying directories which
+ should be ignored for archiving/backup. It works by ignoring
+ directory trees which have a file named CACHEDIR.TAG with a
+ specific content. See
+ http://www.brynosaurus.com/cachedir/spec.html
+ for details.
-Item 3: Implement a Migration job type that will move the job
- data from one device to another.
-Coding begun in 1.35:
+ From Peter Eriksson:
+ I suggest that if this is implemented (I've also asked for this
+ feature some year ago) that it is made compatible with Legato
+ Networkers ".nsr" files where you can specify a lot of options on
+ how to handle files/directories (including denying further
+ parsing of .nsr files lower down into the directory trees). A
+ PDF version of the .nsr man page can be viewed at:
- What: The ability to copy, move, or archive data that is on a
- device to another device is very important.
+ http://www.ifm.liu.se/~peter/nsr.pdf
- Why: An ISP might want to backup to disk, but after 30 days
- migrate the data to tape backup and delete it from
- disk. Bacula should be able to handle this
- automatically. It needs to know what was put where,
- and when, and what to migrate -- it is a bit like
- retention periods. Doing so would allow space to be
- freed up for current backups while maintaining older
- data on tape drives.
-
- Notes: Migration could be triggered by:
- Number of Jobs
- Number of Volumes
- Age of Jobs
- Highwater size (keep total size)
- Lowwater mark
-
-
-Item 4: Embedded Perl Scripting (precursor to 5).
-Some testing done:
-
- What: On a configuration parameter, embed the Perl language in
- Bacula.
-
- Why: The embedded Perl scripting can be called to implement
- Events such as "Volume Name needed", "End of Tape",
- "Tape at x% of rated capacity", "Job started",
- "Job Ended", "Job error", ...
-
- Notes: This needs Events.
-
-
-Item 5: Implement Events that call the scripting language.
-
- What: When a particular user defined Event occurs, call the
- embedded Perl interpreter.
-
- Why: This will provide the ultimate in user customization for
- Bacula. Almost anything imaginable can be done if Events
- are called at the appropriate place.
+ Why: It's a nice alternative to "exclude" patterns for directories
+ which don't have regular pathnames. Also, it allows users to
+ control backup for themselves. Implementation should be pretty
+ simple. GNU tar >= 1.14 or so supports it, too.
- Notes: There is a certain amount of work to be done on how
- the user defines or "registers" events.
+ Notes: I envision this as an optional feature to a fileset
+ specification.
-Item 6: Multiple Storage Devices for a Single Job
-Modifications to SD in progress: 1.35
+Item 16: Implement extraction of Win32 BackupWrite data.
+ Origin: Thorsten Engel <thorsten.engel at matrix-computer dot com>
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Status: Assigned to Thorsten. Implemented in current CVS
- What: Allow any Job to use more than one Storage device.
+ What: This provides the Bacula File daemon with code that
+ can pick apart the stream output that Microsoft writes
+ for BackupWrite data, and thus the data can be read
+ and restored on non-Win32 machines.
- Why: With two devices, for example, the second device could
- have the next backup tape pre-mounted reducing operator
- intervention in the middle of the night.
+ Why: BackupWrite data is the portable=no option in Win32
+ FileSets, and in previous Baculas, this data could
+ only be extracted using a Win32 FD. With this new code,
+ the Windows data can be extracted and restored on
+ any OS.
-Item 7: Backup a Single Job Simultaneously to Multiple Storage Devices
-Modifications to SD in progress: 1.35
+Item 18: Implement a Python interface to the Bacula catalog.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
- What: Make two copies of the backup data at the same time.
+ What: Implement an interface for Python scripts to access
+ the catalog through Bacula.
- Why: Large shops typically do this and then take one set of
- backups off-site. Some design work it needed in how to
- specify the type of backup (backup, archive, ...) for
- each Device.
+ Why: This will permit users to customize Bacula through
+ Python scripts.
+Item 18: Archival (removal) of User Files to Tape
+ Date: Nov. 24/2005
-Item 8: Break the one-to-one Relationship between a Job and a
- Specific Storage Device (or Devices if #10 is implemented).
+ Origin: Ray Pengelly [ray at biomed dot queensu dot ca
+ Status:
- What: Allow a Job to simply specify one or more MediaType, and
- the Storage daemon will select a device for it. In
- fact, the user should be able to specify one or more
- MediaType, Storage daemon, and/or device to be used.
+ What: The ability to archive data to storage based on certain parameters
+ such as age, size, or location. Once the data has been written to
+ storage and logged it is then pruned from the originating
+ filesystem. Note! We are talking about user's files and not
+ Bacula Volumes.
- Why: To allow more flexibility in large shops that have multiple
- drives and/or multiple drives of different types.
+ Why: This would allow fully automatic storage management which becomes
+ useful for large datastores. It would also allow for auto-staging
+ from one media type to another.
+ Example 1) Medical imaging needs to store large amounts of data.
+ They decide to keep data on their servers for 6 months and then put
+ it away for long term storage. The server then finds all files
+ older than 6 months writes them to tape. The files are then removed
+ from the server.
-Item 9: Implement data encryption (as opposed to communications
- encryption)
-Assigned: to Meno Abels (both data and communications encryption).
-
- What: Currently the data that is stored on the Volume is not
- encrypted. For confidentiality, encryption of data at
- the File daemon level is essential. Note, communications
- encryption encrypts the data when leaving the File daemon,
- then decrypts the data on entry to the Storage daemon.
- Data encryption encrypts the data in the File daemon and
- decrypts the data in the File daemon during a restore.
-
- Why: Large sites require this.
-
- Notes: The only algorithm that is needed is AES.
- http://csrc.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit/aes/
+ Example 2) All data that hasn't been accessed in 2 months could be
+ moved from high-cost, fibre-channel disk storage to a low-cost
+ large-capacity SATA disk storage pool which doesn't have as quick of
+ access time. Then after another 6 months (or possibly as one
+ storage pool gets full) data is migrated to Tape.
+Item 19: Add Plug-ins to the FileSet Include statements.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin:
+ Status: Partially coded in 1.37 -- much more to do.
+ What: Allow users to specify wild-card and/or regular
+ expressions to be matched in both the Include and
+ Exclude directives in a FileSet. At the same time,
+ allow users to define plug-ins to be called (based on
+ regular expression/wild-card matching).
-Completed items from last year's list:
-Item 1: Multiple simultaneous Jobs. (done)
-Item 3: Write the bscan program -- also write a bcopy program (done).
-Item 5: Implement Label templates (done).
-Item 6: Write a regression script (done)
-Item 9: Add SSL to daemon communications (For now, implement with
- stunnel)
-Item 10: Define definitive tape format (done)
-Item 3: GUI for interactive restore. Partially Implemented in 1.34
- Note, there is now a complete Webmin plugin, a partial
- GNOME console, and an excellent wx-console GUI.
-Item 4: GUI for interactive backup
-Item 2: Job Data Spooling.
- Done: Regular expression matching.
-Item 10: New daemon communication protocol (this has been dropped).
+ Why: This would give the users the ultimate ability to control
+ how files are backed up/restored. A user could write a
+ plug-in knows how to backup his Oracle database without
+ stopping/starting it, for example.
+Item 20: Implement more Python events in Bacula.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin:
+ Status:
+
+ What: Allow Python scripts to be called at more places
+ within Bacula and provide additional access to Bacula
+ internal variables.
+
+ Why: This will permit users to customize Bacula through
+ Python scripts.
+
+ Notes: Recycle event
+ Scratch pool event
+ NeedVolume event
+ MediaFull event
+
+ Also add a way to get a listing of currently running
+ jobs (possibly also scheduled jobs).
+
+
+Item 21: Quick release of FD-SD connection after backup.
+ Origin: Frank Volf (frank at deze dot org)
+ Date: 17 November 2005
+ Status:
+
+ What: In the Bacula implementation a backup is finished after all data
+ and attributes are successfully written to storage. When using a
+ tape backup it is very annoying that a backup can take a day,
+ simply because the current tape (or whatever) is full and the
+ administrator has not put a new one in. During that time the
+ system cannot be taken off-line, because there is still an open
+ session between the storage daemon and the file daemon on the
+ client.
+
+ Although this is a very good strategy for making "safe backups"
+ This can be annoying for e.g. laptops, that must remain
+ connected until the backup is completed.
+
+ Using a new feature called "migration" it will be possible to
+ spool first to harddisk (using a special 'spool' migration
+ scheme) and then migrate the backup to tape.
+
+ There is still the problem of getting the attributes committed.
+ If it takes a very long time to do, with the current code, the
+ job has not terminated, and the File daemon is not freed up. The
+ Storage daemon should release the File daemon as soon as all the
+ file data and all the attributes have been sent to it (the SD).
+ Currently the SD waits until everything is on tape and all the
+ attributes are transmitted to the Director before signaling
+ completion to the FD. I don't think I would have any problem
+ changing this. The reason is that even if the FD reports back to
+ the Dir that all is OK, the job will not terminate until the SD
+ has done the same thing -- so in a way keeping the SD-FD link
+ open to the very end is not really very productive ...
+
+ Why: Makes backup of laptops much easier.
+
+Item 22: Permit multiple Media Types in an Autochanger
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status: Now implemented
+
+ What: Modify the Storage daemon so that multiple Media Types
+ can be specified in an autochanger. This would be somewhat
+ of a simplistic implementation in that each drive would
+ still be allowed to have only one Media Type. However,
+ the Storage daemon will ensure that only a drive with
+ the Media Type that matches what the Director specifies
+ is chosen.
+
+ Why: This will permit user with several different drive types
+ to make full use of their autochangers.
+
+Item 23: Allow different autochanger definitions for one autochanger.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
+
+ What: Currently, the autochanger script is locked based on
+ the autochanger. That is, if multiple drives are being
+ simultaneously used, the Storage daemon ensures that only
+ one drive at a time can access the mtx-changer script.
+ This change would base the locking on the control device,
+ rather than the autochanger. It would then permit two autochanger
+ definitions for the same autochanger, but with different
+ drives. Logically, the autochanger could then be "partitioned"
+ for different jobs, clients, or class of jobs, and if the locking
+ is based on the control device (e.g. /dev/sg0) the mtx-changer
+ script will be locked appropriately.
+
+ Why: This will permit users to partition autochangers for specific
+ use. It would also permit implementation of multiple Media
+ Types with no changes to the Storage daemon.
+
+Item 24: Automatic disabling of devices
+ Date: 2005-11-11
+ Origin: Peter Eriksson <peter at ifm.liu dot se>
+ Status:
+
+ What: After a configurable amount of fatal errors with a tape drive
+ Bacula should automatically disable further use of a certain
+ tape drive. There should also be "disable"/"enable" commands in
+ the "bconsole" tool.
+
+ Why: On a multi-drive jukebox there is a possibility of tape drives
+ going bad during large backups (needing a cleaning tape run,
+ tapes getting stuck). It would be advantageous if Bacula would
+ automatically disable further use of a problematic tape drive
+ after a configurable amount of errors has occurred.
+
+ An example: I have a multi-drive jukebox (6 drives, 380+ slots)
+ where tapes occasionally get stuck inside the drive. Bacula will
+ notice that the "mtx-changer" command will fail and then fail
+ any backup jobs trying to use that drive. However, it will still
+ keep on trying to run new jobs using that drive and fail -
+ forever, and thus failing lots and lots of jobs... Since we have
+ many drives Bacula could have just automatically disabled
+ further use of that drive and used one of the other ones
+ instead.
+
+Item 25: Implement huge exclude list support using hashing.
+ Date: 28 October 2005
+ Origin: Kern
+ Status:
+
+ What: Allow users to specify very large exclude list (currently
+ more than about 1000 files is too many).
+
+ Why: This would give the users the ability to exclude all
+ files that are loaded with the OS (e.g. using rpms
+ or debs). If the user can restore the base OS from
+ CDs, there is no need to backup all those files. A
+ complete restore would be to restore the base OS, then
+ do a Bacula restore. By excluding the base OS files, the
+ backup set will be *much* smaller.
+
+===============================================
+Not in Dec 2005 Vote:
+Item n: Allow skipping execution of Jobs
+ Date: 29 November 2005
+ Origin: Florian Schnabel <florian.schnabel at docufy dot de>
+ Status:
+
+ What: An easy option to skip a certain job on a certain date.
+ Why: You could then easily skip tape backups on holidays. Especially
+ if you got no autochanger and can only fit one backup on a tape
+ that would be really handy, other jobs could proceed normally
+ and you won't get errors that way.
+
+============= Empty Feature Request form ===========
+Item n: One line summary ...
+ Date: Date submitted
+ Origin: Name and email of originator.
+ Status:
+
+ What: More detailed explanation ...
+
+ Why: Why it is important ...
+
+ Notes: Additional notes or features (omit if not used)
+============== End Feature Request form ==============
projects / bacula / bacula / blobdiff