<h2>The Two Restore Interfaces</h2>
-<p>Both restore interfaces accomplish the same 3 steps in different ways.
-Those steps are to select jobs to restore from, give the user the
-opportunity to select files and directories, then indicate details of
-the host and path to restore to and run the job.
+<p>Both interfaces accomplish the same three steps.
+The steps are to select jobs to restore from, give the user the
+opportunity to select files/directories, then indicate details such as
+the host and path to restore to and trigger the job to run.
<h2>The Standard Restore Interface</h2>
<p>Start the standard restore procedure by pressing the restore button
in the task bar. There are also two options in the joblist context sensitive
-menu to start a restore. They are restore from time or restore from job.
+menu to start a restore. They are Restore From Time or Restore From Job.
-<p>This interface is intended as a high performance restore option.
+<p>This restore method is intended as a high performance option.
It is a server side process. These interfaces assist the user in utilizing the
text based restore capabilities of the standard console. It interprets the text
to display the information in a way that simplifies the restore procedure.
<p>The Opening interface allows the user to choose selection criterion to
inform the server how to determine the set of backup job ids to use in the
-restore. This best possible set is be the most recent full backup, the most
+restore. This best possible set is he most recent full backup, the most
recent differential backup done since the most recent full, and all the
incremental backups done since the most recent full or differential. Then the
server uses this set of jobs to create a file structure that is the
the server by any other interface.
<p>The second interface allows the user to browse this file structure and
-choose the files and directories to restore. This is be done in an explorer
+choose the files and directories to restore. This is done in an explorer
type interface with a directory tree on the left. In the right pane of a
-splitter is be a table showing a list of files and directories that are the
+splitter is a table showing a list of files and directories that are the
contents of the directory selected in the left pane. The user can mark and
unmark either with the buttons on the top or by double clicking on the check
mark icon to toggle whether an item is selected or not. Double clicking an
process. The user can have an unlimited number of selection windows open at a
time for viewing the cataloged jobs, directories, files and versions.
-<p>This restore interface is <b>NOT</b> intended to preform major restores of directory
+<p>This restore interface is <b>NOT</b> intended to perform major restores of directory
structures with large numbers of directories and files. It should work, however
it is a chatty interface. This is due to the number of sql queries made of the server
which is proportional to the number of files and directories selected plus the number of
are available in the catalog to restore.
<p>The interface contains a horizontal splitter. The bottom pane contains
-some controlling widgets for the interface.
-The top pane contains a vertical splitter with 4 widgets for viewing the
-cataloged information. The left widget is for viewing and further sub selecting
+some controls for the interface.
+The top portion contains a vertical splitter with 4 panes for viewing the
+cataloged information. The left pane is for viewing and further sub selecting
of jobs. The second pane is for viewing the directory tree. The third is for
viewing a list of files in a directory that has been selected. Then
-lastly the fourth widget is for viewing a table of versions of a single file
-that has been selected from the file widget.
+lastly the fourth pane is for viewing a table of versions of a single file
+that has been selected from the file table.
<p>The version browser accomplishes the three restore steps differently.
Restore. These indicate to the user the time it may take to complete any tasks
that could take a long time period.
+<h2>Version Browser Performance</h2>
+
+<p>If you have used the version browser with a large database, you may have
+noticed that the performance can begin to be quite slow. A way to improve the
+response time of the database server is to add indexes that will assist a
+couple of the specific queries that are made.
+
+<p>For postgresql add 2 indexes with the following commands in psql:
+<br>CREATE INDEX file_filenameid_jobid ON file USING btree (filenameid,
+jobid);
+<br>CREATE INDEX file_pathid_idx ON file USING btree (pathid);
+
+<p>For mysql add 2 indexes with the following commands in mysql:
+<br>CREATE INDEX file_filenameid_jobid ON File (FilenameId, JobId);
+<br>CREATE INDEX file_pathid_idx ON File (PathId);
+
+<p>There is one way to make the first of those two indexes perform just a
+little better. It is to create a partial index. First, at least one backup
+must be in the database that has at least one directory. Then in psql or mysql
+perform the command:
+<br>SELECT FilenameId FROM Filename WHERE name='';
+<br>Use the results of this command and replace for XXX in the following command:
+<br>CREATE INDEX file_filenameid_jobid2 ON File (JobId) WHERE FilenameId=XXX;
+<br>This index will use less disk space and will perform better. Don't forget to
+remove the index it replaces, file_filenameid_jobid.
+
+<p>If you have sqlite and would be willing to test out the creation of these
+indexes to see if they work, please let me know the commands.
+
</BODY>
</HTML>
projects / bacula / bacula / blobdiff